From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:34:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127223401.GL9151@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232651764-10799-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:16:03PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before
> returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of
> the other fields in the file_lock.
>
> When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to
> nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back
> after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses
> nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock.
>
> Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the
> fields from the conflicting lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
I'll leave this one to gfs2 people to apply unless I'm told otherwise.
--b.
> ---
> fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> index eba87ff..ca46f11 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
> if (rv == -ENOENT)
> rv = 0;
> else if (rv > 0) {
> + locks_init_lock(fl);
> fl->fl_type = (op->info.ex) ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK;
> + fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
> fl->fl_pid = op->info.pid;
> fl->fl_start = op->info.start;
> fl->fl_end = op->info.end;
> --
> 1.5.5.6
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
teigland@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:34:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127223401.GL9151@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232651764-10799-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:16:03PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before
> returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of
> the other fields in the file_lock.
>
> When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to
> nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back
> after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses
> nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock.
>
> Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the
> fields from the conflicting lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
I'll leave this one to gfs2 people to apply unless I'm told otherwise.
--b.
> ---
> fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> index eba87ff..ca46f11 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
> if (rv == -ENOENT)
> rv = 0;
> else if (rv > 0) {
> + locks_init_lock(fl);
> fl->fl_type = (op->info.ex) ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK;
> + fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
> fl->fl_pid = op->info.pid;
> fl->fl_start = op->info.start;
> fl->fl_end = op->info.end;
> --
> 1.5.5.6
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
teigland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:34:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127223401.GL9151@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232651764-10799-2-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:16:03PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> dlm_posix_get fills out the relevant fields in the file_lock before
> returning when there is a lock conflict, but doesn't clean out any of
> the other fields in the file_lock.
>
> When nfsd does a NFSv4 lockt call, it sets the fl_lmops to
> nfsd_posix_mng_ops before calling the lower fs. When the lock comes back
> after testing a lock on GFS2, it still has that field set. This confuses
> nfsd into thinking that the file_lock is a nfsd4 lock.
>
> Fix this by making DLM reinitialize the file_lock before copying the
> fields from the conflicting lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
I'll leave this one to gfs2 people to apply unless I'm told otherwise.
--b.
> ---
> fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> index eba87ff..ca46f11 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ int dlm_posix_get(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
> if (rv == -ENOENT)
> rv = 0;
> else if (rv > 0) {
> + locks_init_lock(fl);
> fl->fl_type = (op->info.ex) ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK;
> + fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
> fl->fl_pid = op->info.pid;
> fl->fl_start = op->info.start;
> fl->fl_end = op->info.end;
> --
> 1.5.5.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 19:16 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-27 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-01-27 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 23:30 ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2009-01-27 23:30 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-27 22:33 ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 22:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-27 22:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 19:57 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 19:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-21 16:34 [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call on GFS2 (regression) Jeff Layton
2009-01-21 16:34 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock Jeff Layton
2009-01-21 23:42 ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 2:26 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:05 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:05 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:03 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 19:03 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 19:03 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127223401.GL9151@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.