From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded (i386 build errors: cpusets & kexec)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:01:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129100157.965bd396.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129120935.GB9221@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:09:35 -0500 Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > > So does that.
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/printk.c~kexec-add-dmesg-log-symbols-to-proc-vmcoreinfo-lists-fix-fix
> > > +++ a/kernel/printk.c
> > > @@ -137,11 +137,13 @@ static char *log_buf = __log_buf;
> > > static int log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> > > static unsigned logged_chars; /* Number of chars produced since last read+clear operation */
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > > void log_buf_kexec_setup(void)
> > > {
> > > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf);
> > > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_end);
> > > }
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
> > > {
> > > _
> >
> > Weird, I thought I checked that just now. In any case this email
> > was already in my inbox. In any case, I can now produce the problem,
> > and this patch resolves it.
> >
>
> Sorry, i didn't think to check on conditions when CONFIG_KEXEC wasn't set. I
> assumed we had a stub for all the VMCOREINFO defines. Why don't we fix it in
> that manner? I mean we have serveral arch specific additions to vmcoreinfo, all
> of which apparently must be ifdefd for this to work. Why not just fix it in
> conditional definition?
I didn't do that because then we'd have an empty function log_buf_kexec_setup()
floating about in every vmlinux.
Hardly a big issue, but a bit regrettable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-28 10:19 mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded akpm
2009-01-28 16:56 ` mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded (i386 build errors: cpusets & kexec) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 2:28 ` Simon Horman
2009-01-29 12:09 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-29 14:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-01-29 19:28 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-29 18:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-29 19:27 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-29 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 21:15 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-29 3:43 ` mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-29 17:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 4:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-29 16:25 ` mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded - docking station issues Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-31 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-31 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-31 8:40 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-31 8:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090129100157.965bd396.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.