All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel-AhlLAIvw+VEjIGhXcJzhZg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] eventfd semaphore-like behavior
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:34:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204163434.1395a928.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041621360.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Davide Libenzi <davidel-AhlLAIvw+VEjIGhXcJzhZg@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:59:07 +1300
> > Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > >> > > > What should be userspace's fallback strategy if that support is not
> > > >> > > > present?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > #ifdef EFD_SEMAPHORE, maybe?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > That's compile-time.  People who ship binaries will probably want
> > > >> > to find a runtime thing for back-compatibility.
> > > >>
> > > >> I dunno. How do they actually do when we add new flags, like the O_ ones?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Dunno.  Probably try the syscall and see if it returned -EINVAL.  Does
> > > > that work in this case?
> > > 
> > > As youll have seen by now, Ulrich and I noted that it works.
> > 
> > I think you means "should work" ;)
> > 
> > We're talking about this, yes?
> > 
> > SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int, count, int, flags)
> > {
> > 	int fd;
> > 	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> > 
> > 	/* Check the EFD_* constants for consistency.  */
> > 	BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
> > 	BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_NONBLOCK != O_NONBLOCK);
> > 
> > 	if (flags & ~(EFD_CLOEXEC | EFD_NONBLOCK))
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > That looks like it should work to me.
> 
> I lost you guys. On old kernels you'd get -EINVAL when using the new flag. 
> Wasn't it clear? Or is there some side-band traffic in this conversation 
> that I missed? :)
> 

Well yes, that.  What I was trying to establish here is that we have
thought about (and preferably tested) userspace's back-compatibility
arrangements.

We have now done that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, mtk.manpages@googlemail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] eventfd semaphore-like behavior
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:34:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204163434.1395a928.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041621360.6214@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:59:07 +1300
> > Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > >> > > > What should be userspace's fallback strategy if that support is not
> > > >> > > > present?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > #ifdef EFD_SEMAPHORE, maybe?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > That's compile-time.  People who ship binaries will probably want
> > > >> > to find a runtime thing for back-compatibility.
> > > >>
> > > >> I dunno. How do they actually do when we add new flags, like the O_ ones?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Dunno.  Probably try the syscall and see if it returned -EINVAL.  Does
> > > > that work in this case?
> > > 
> > > As youll have seen by now, Ulrich and I noted that it works.
> > 
> > I think you means "should work" ;)
> > 
> > We're talking about this, yes?
> > 
> > SYSCALL_DEFINE2(eventfd2, unsigned int, count, int, flags)
> > {
> > 	int fd;
> > 	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> > 
> > 	/* Check the EFD_* constants for consistency.  */
> > 	BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
> > 	BUILD_BUG_ON(EFD_NONBLOCK != O_NONBLOCK);
> > 
> > 	if (flags & ~(EFD_CLOEXEC | EFD_NONBLOCK))
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > That looks like it should work to me.
> 
> I lost you guys. On old kernels you'd get -EINVAL when using the new flag. 
> Wasn't it clear? Or is there some side-band traffic in this conversation 
> that I missed? :)
> 

Well yes, that.  What I was trying to establish here is that we have
thought about (and preferably tested) userspace's back-compatibility
arrangements.

We have now done that.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-04 22:58 [patch/rfc] eventfd semaphore-like behavior Davide Libenzi
     [not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041349180.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:05   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 23:05     ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]     ` <20090204150507.665b5b7c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:18       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-02-04 23:18         ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]         ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041509060.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:24           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 23:24             ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]             ` <20090204152434.c8f65d52.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:27               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-02-04 23:27                 ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041526590.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:48                   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-04 23:48                     ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-04 23:55                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 23:55                     ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                     ` <20090204155514.6abbdc8f.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:59                       ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-04 23:59                         ` Michael Kerrisk
     [not found]                         ` <cfd18e0f0902041559l4c40d9b6k704068337a00df7a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05  0:02                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-02-05  0:02                             ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                             ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041600170.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-30  5:21                               ` Michael Kerrisk
2010-08-30  5:21                                 ` Michael Kerrisk
     [not found]                                 ` <AANLkTim_seWr0LZJyC+dPBy-N+_NkzTx21vte7qrwunC-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-08-30  5:24                                   ` Michael Kerrisk
2010-08-30  5:24                                     ` Michael Kerrisk
2010-08-30 14:22                                 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-02-05  0:18                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05  0:18                             ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                             ` <20090204161816.b93a4588.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05  0:25                               ` Davide Libenzi
2009-02-05  0:25                                 ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                                 ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902041621360.6214-GPJ85BhbkB8RepQJljzAVbITYcZ0+W3JAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05  0:34                                   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-05  0:34                                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05  0:26                             ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-04 23:45       ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-02-04 23:45         ` Ulrich Drepper
     [not found]         ` <a36005b50902041545qb9ce459y710bb3b9b8949b17-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 23:49           ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-04 23:49             ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-09  7:45 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-09 17:39   ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] <499E527B.2030702@fastmq.com>
2009-02-20  7:00 ` Martin Sustrik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090204163434.1395a928.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davidel-AhlLAIvw+VEjIGhXcJzhZg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.