All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Cc: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	mbligh@google.com, thockin@google.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:34:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205143453.GG28443@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090205043548.GA18933@google.com>


* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com> wrote:

> The batch_count controls the preemptibility of hung_task. While it might 
> not make sense to expose the value to user-space, we may want to use a 
> different value for the PREEMPT config (not sure what the specific values 
> should be):
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)
> static const int check_count_batching = 256;
> #else
> static const int check_count_batching = 2048;
> #endif

That really is not worth it - and such #ifdefs always look ugly and split 
testing as well.

I've applied your patch to tip:core/softlockup, thanks Mandeep!

	Ingo

------------->
>From 9952001914a7230ab88212a1e2d0e80208bdb907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:35:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Impact: extend the scope of hung-task checks

Changed the default value of hung_task_check_count to PID_MAX_LIMIT.
hung_task_batch_count added to put an upper bound on the critical
section. Every hung_task_batch_count checks, the rcu lock is never
held for a too long time.

Keeping the critical section small minimizes time preemption is disabled
and keeps rcu grace periods small.

To prevent following a stale pointer, get_task_struct is called on g and t.
To verify that g and t have not been unhashed while outside the critical
section, the task states are checked.

The design was proposed by Frédéric Weisbecker.

Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Suggested-by: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/hung_task.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index ba8ccd4..d32d293 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -17,9 +17,18 @@
 #include <linux/sysctl.h>
 
 /*
- * Have a reasonable limit on the number of tasks checked:
+ * The number of tasks checked:
  */
-unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = 1024;
+unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = PID_MAX_LIMIT;
+
+/*
+ * Limit number of tasks checked in a batch.
+ *
+ * This value controls the preemptibility of khungtaskd since preemption
+ * is disabled during the critical section. It also controls the size of
+ * the RCU grace period. So it needs to be upper-bound.
+ */
+static const int hung_task_batching = 1024;
 
 /*
  * Zero means infinite timeout - no checking done:
@@ -109,6 +118,24 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now,
 		panic("hung_task: blocked tasks");
 }
 
+ /*
+  * To avoid extending the RCU grace period for an unbounded amount of time,
+  * periodically exit the critical section and enter a new one.
+  *
+  * For preemptible RCU it is sufficient to call rcu_read_unlock in order
+  * exit the grace period. For classic RCU, a reschedule is required.
+  */
+static void rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct *g, struct task_struct *t)
+{
+	get_task_struct(g);
+	get_task_struct(t);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	cond_resched();
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	put_task_struct(t);
+	put_task_struct(g);
+}
+
 /*
  * Check whether a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE does not get woken up for
  * a really long time (120 seconds). If that happens, print out
@@ -116,6 +143,7 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now,
  */
 static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 {
+	int batch_count = hung_task_batching;
 	int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
 	unsigned long now = get_timestamp();
 	struct task_struct *g, *t;
@@ -131,6 +159,13 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 	do_each_thread(g, t) {
 		if (!--max_count)
 			goto unlock;
+		if (!--batch_count) {
+			batch_count = hung_task_batching;
+			rcu_lock_break(g, t);
+			/* Exit if t or g was unhashed during refresh. */
+			if (t->state == TASK_DEAD || g->state == TASK_DEAD)
+				goto unlock;
+		}
 		/* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
 		if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 			check_hung_task(t, now, timeout);

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-25 20:50 [RFC][PATCH 2/2] add a counter for writers spinning on a rwlock Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-26 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 15:25   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-26 15:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 16:04       ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-26 17:36         ` Mandeep Baines
2009-01-26 17:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-27  0:30             ` [PATCH v4] softlockup: remove hung_task_check_count Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-27  9:27               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 13:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 18:48                 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-28  8:25                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29  1:42                     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:41                       ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:46                       ` [PATCH 1/2] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to rcu_read_lock Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:49                       ` [PATCH 2/2] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-31 19:22                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-03  0:05                           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-03 12:23                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 20:56                               ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-04 19:43                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05  4:35                                   ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 14:34                                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-05 17:48                                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05 18:07                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 18:30                                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05 18:58                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 18:40                                         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 17:56                                       ` [PATCH] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to rcu_read_lock Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 18:13                                         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090205143453.GG28443@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=msb@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thockin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.