All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Cc: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	mbligh@google.com, thockin@google.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to rcu_read_lock
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:13:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205181329.GA5661@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090205175608.GA10819@google.com>


* Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
> > 
> > I've applied your patch to tip:core/softlockup, thanks Mandeep!
> > 
> 
> Oops, I put the conversion to rcu_read_lock in a seperate patch. I
> understand now the convention is to use a patch series only when the
> patches can be applied independently.

What you did is in fact the preferred approach: keep independent stuff 
independent and make patches as gradual and split-up as possible. (as long 
as the interim state is a working kernel too)

> ---
> Since the tasklist is protected by rcu list operations, it is safe
> to convert the read_lock()s to rcu_read_lock().
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
> ---
>  kernel/hung_task.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied to tip:core/softlockup, thanks!

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-25 20:50 [RFC][PATCH 2/2] add a counter for writers spinning on a rwlock Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-26 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 15:25   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-26 15:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 16:04       ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-26 17:36         ` Mandeep Baines
2009-01-26 17:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-27  0:30             ` [PATCH v4] softlockup: remove hung_task_check_count Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-27  9:27               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 13:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 18:48                 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-28  8:25                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29  1:42                     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:41                       ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:46                       ` [PATCH 1/2] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to rcu_read_lock Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-30 20:49                       ` [PATCH 2/2] softlockup: check all tasks in hung_task Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-31 19:22                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-03  0:05                           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-03 12:23                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 20:56                               ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-04 19:43                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05  4:35                                   ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 14:34                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:48                                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05 18:07                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 18:30                                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-05 18:58                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 18:40                                         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 17:56                                       ` [PATCH] softlockup: convert read_lock in hung_task to rcu_read_lock Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-05 18:13                                         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090205181329.GA5661@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=msb@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thockin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.