* 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
@ 2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Stable Kernel Team
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and
2.6.28, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.27
and 2.6.28, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-02-24 154 27 23
2009-02-15 152 30 26
2009-02-04 149 33 30
2009-01-20 144 30 27
2009-01-11 139 33 30
2008-12-21 120 19 17
2008-12-13 111 14 13
2008-12-07 106 20 17
2008-12-04 106 29 21
2008-11-22 93 25 15
2008-11-16 89 32 18
2008-11-09 73 40 27
2008-11-02 55 41 29
2008-10-25 26 25 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Subject : scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2009-02-15 11:44 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123469852817058&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
Subject : >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
Submitter : David Pflug <dtpflug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-17 19:28 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123489904218306&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12690
Subject : DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work
Submitter : Antonin Kolisek <akolisek@linuxx.hyperlinx.cz>
Date : 2009-02-11 09:40 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645
Subject : DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10
Submitter : Patrick Walton <pcwalton@cs.ucla.edu>
Date : 2009-02-06 18:35 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0af40a4b1050c050e62eb1dc30b82d5ab22bf221
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12634
Subject : video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3
Submitter : Bob Raitz <pappy_mcfae@yahoo.com>
Date : 2009-02-04 21:10 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12619
Subject : Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed
Submitter : jan sonnek <ha2nny@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-02-01 19:59 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123351836213969&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12500
Subject : r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2009-01-13 21:19 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188160811322&w=4
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
Subject : KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Submitter : Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>
Date : 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Subject : GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues
Submitter : Doug Bazarnic <doug@bazarnic.net>
Date : 2009-01-09 21:26 (46 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123153653120204&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Subject : 2.6.28: BUG in r8169
Submitter : Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-12-31 18:37 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123074869611409&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
Subject : Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls
Submitter : Michael Roth <mroth@nessie.de>
Date : 2008-12-25 15:14 (61 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123021931714282&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12407
Subject : Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate
Submitter : Frank Groeneveld <frankgroeneveld@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-12-28 20:34 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123049651906081&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12405
Subject : oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date : 2008-12-26 17:36 (60 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123031303400676&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
Subject : Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e
Submitter : Kernel <kernel@bazarnic.net>
Date : 2008-12-22 9:37 (64 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122993873320150&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12401
Subject : 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-01-05 8:39 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=22c13f9d8179f4c9caecfcb60a95214562b9addc
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123114479110314&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674@yahoo.com>
Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
Subject : oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)
Submitter : Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Date : 2008-12-12 18:49 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122910784006472&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907511319288&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12160
Subject : networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-11-28 21:15 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122790701615723&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12061
Subject : snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown
Submitter : Jens Weibler <bugzilla-kernel@jensthebrain.de>
Date : 2008-11-18 12:07 (98 days old)
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
Subject : WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e
Submitter : Philipp Matthias Hahn <pmhahn@titan.lahn.de>
Date : 2009-01-29 6:31 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123321232825316&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@tdiedrich.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123330459229248&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123411195117835&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12612
Subject : hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav
Submitter : Matthias Reichl <hias@horus.com>
Date : 2009-01-28 16:41 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123316111415677&w=4
Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123371501613019&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
Subject : 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad
Submitter : Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-12-27 9:06 (59 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123036893817280&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan Opmeer <arjan@opmeer.net>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123092147703236&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11808
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12061] snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Weibler, Takashi Iwai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12061
Subject : snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown
Submitter : Jens Weibler <bugzilla-kernel-6hJTtV8wudIr9FUcG+3rRQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-11-18 12:07 (98 days old)
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Miklos Szeredi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <miklos-sUDqSbJrdHQHWmgEVkV9KA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12209] oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andreas Mohr
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
Subject : oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)
Submitter : Andreas Mohr <andi-5+Cda9B46AM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-12 18:49 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122910784006472&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907511319288&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12160] networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marcin Slusarz, netdev
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12160
Subject : networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-11-28 21:15 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122790701615723&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alberto Gonzalez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alberto Gonzalez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674@yahoo.com>
Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 10:53 ` Alberto Gonzalez
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Gonzalez @ 2009-02-24 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Kernel Testers List
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it
> still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry :
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
> Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
Still present, yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
@ 2009-02-24 10:53 ` Alberto Gonzalez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Gonzalez @ 2009-02-24 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Kernel Testers List
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it
> still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry :
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
> Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674@yahoo.com>
> Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
Still present, yes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
2009-02-24 10:53 ` Alberto Gonzalez
(?)
@ 2009-02-24 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <200902242223.39069.nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 105+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2009-02-24 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: luis6674
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 21:53:44 Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> > regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it
> > still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry :
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> > Subject : ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
> > Submitter : Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674@yahoo.com>
> > Date : 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
>
> Still present, yes.
Any chance you could bisect it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Robert Richter, Tim Blechmann
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Robert Richter, Tim Blechmann
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 11:32 ` Robert Richter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-03-03 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen,
Tim Blechmann
Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
-Robert
On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
>
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-03-03 11:32 ` Robert Richter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Robert Richter @ 2009-03-03 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen,
Tim Blechmann
Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
-Robert
On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
> Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
>
>
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090303113218.GE10085-yX1UDyMwZ8xWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-03-03 11:32 ` Robert Richter
@ 2009-03-03 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen,
Tim Blechmann
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
>
> 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
URL, please?
Rafael
> On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> > Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> > Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> > Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-03-03 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Richter
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen,
Tim Blechmann
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
>
> 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
URL, please?
Rafael
> On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> > Subject : 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> > Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
> > Date : 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> > Handled-By : Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200903032055.23969.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-03-03 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-03-03 20:45 ` Ingo Molnar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-03 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> >
> > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
>
> URL, please?
The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
Ingo
------------>
From 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:34:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on Core2
Impact: fix stuck NMIs and non-working oprofile on certain CPUs
Resetting the counter width of the performance counters on Intel's
Core2 CPUs, breaks the delivery of NMIs, when running in x86_64 mode.
This should fix bug #12395:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Signed-off-by: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
LKML-Reference: <20090303100412.GC10085-yX1UDyMwZ8xWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index e9f80c7..10131fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -78,8 +78,18 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
if (cpu_has_arch_perfmon) {
union cpuid10_eax eax;
eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
- if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
- counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+
+ /*
+ * For Core2 (family 6, model 15), don't reset the
+ * counter width:
+ */
+ if (!(eax.split.version_id == 0 &&
+ current_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
+ current_cpu_data.x86_model == 15)) {
+
+ if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
+ counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+ }
}
/* clear all counters */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-03-03 20:45 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-03 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> >
> > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
>
> URL, please?
The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
Ingo
------------>
>From 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:34:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on Core2
Impact: fix stuck NMIs and non-working oprofile on certain CPUs
Resetting the counter width of the performance counters on Intel's
Core2 CPUs, breaks the delivery of NMIs, when running in x86_64 mode.
This should fix bug #12395:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Signed-off-by: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090303100412.GC10085@erda.amd.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index e9f80c7..10131fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -78,8 +78,18 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
if (cpu_has_arch_perfmon) {
union cpuid10_eax eax;
eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
- if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
- counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+
+ /*
+ * For Core2 (family 6, model 15), don't reset the
+ * counter width:
+ */
+ if (!(eax.split.version_id == 0 &&
+ current_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
+ current_cpu_data.x86_model == 15)) {
+
+ if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
+ counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+ }
}
/* clear all counters */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20090303204504.GA20038-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-03-03 20:45 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-03 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-03 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > >
> > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> >
> > URL, please?
>
> The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
Thanks a lot!
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-03-03 20:45 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-04 17:58 ` Ingo Molnar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
* Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > >
> > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> >
> > URL, please?
>
> The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-03-04 17:58 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-04 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > >
> > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> >
> > URL, please?
>
> The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090304175828.GA1172-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
2009-03-04 17:58 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-07 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > > >
> > > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> > >
> > > URL, please?
> >
> > The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
>
> The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
@ 2009-03-07 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-03-07 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Robert Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andi Kleen, Tim Blechmann
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > > >
> > > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> > >
> > > URL, please?
> >
> > The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
>
> The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-02-24 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek,
Stable Team
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.
"Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
have it as well.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
@ 2009-02-24 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-02-24 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek,
Stable Team
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
> Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.
"Cc: stable@kernel.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
have it as well.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902241101580.3523-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
2009-02-24 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2009-02-25 22:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-25 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek,
Stable Team
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> > Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> > Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> > Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
>
> Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.
>
> "Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
> have it as well.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
@ 2009-02-25 22:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-25 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Michal Suchanek,
Stable Team
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> > Subject : debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> > Submitter : Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
> > Date : 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> > Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
>
> Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.
>
> "Cc: stable@kernel.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
> have it as well.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12407] Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frank Groeneveld, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12407
Subject : Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate
Submitter : Frank Groeneveld <frankgroeneveld-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-28 20:34 (58 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123049651906081&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12404] Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kernel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
Subject : Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e
Submitter : Kernel <kernel-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-22 9:37 (64 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122993873320150&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12401] 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Len Brown, Matthew Garrett,
Thomas Renninger, Tino Keitel, Zhang Rui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12401
Subject : 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-05 8:39 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=22c13f9d8179f4c9caecfcb60a95214562b9addc
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123114479110314&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12405] oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Hellwig, Jens Axboe
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12405
Subject : oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm
Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-26 17:36 (60 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123031303400676&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12406] 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander E. Patrakov, Arjan Opmeer,
Denys Vlasenko, Dmitry Torokhov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
Subject : 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad
Submitter : Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-27 9:06 (59 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123036893817280&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan Opmeer <arjan-OssVvNj1wBysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123092147703236&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12408] Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael Roth, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
Subject : Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls
Submitter : Michael Roth <mroth-+8Z3Oe2AQjqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-25 15:14 (61 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123021931714282&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frederik Deweerdt, Tetsuo Handa
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frederik Deweerdt, Tetsuo Handa
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 3:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2009-02-24 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0
Cc: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
> Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
> Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
> Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
>
I couldn't reproduce this problem in native and KVM environments.
This problem seems to be VMware specific and priority is low.
Alok Kataria queued this problem.
Thus, this problem has not yet solved but mainline kernels don't need to wait
for this problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
@ 2009-02-24 3:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2009-02-24 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw; +Cc: kernel-testers, frederik.deweerdt, linux-kernel
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
> Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
> Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
> Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
> Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
>
I couldn't reproduce this problem in native and KVM environments.
This problem seems to be VMware specific and priority is low.
Alok Kataria queued this problem.
Thus, this problem has not yet solved but mainline kernels don't need to wait
for this problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200902240354.n1O3sous011760-etx+eQDEXHD7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
2009-02-24 3:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
@ 2009-02-25 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-25 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
> > Subject : NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
> > Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
> > Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
> >
> I couldn't reproduce this problem in native and KVM environments.
> This problem seems to be VMware specific and priority is low.
> Alok Kataria queued this problem.
> Thus, this problem has not yet solved but mainline kernels don't need to wait
> for this problem.
Thanks, I've dropped it from my list.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12421] GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Doug Bazarnic
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Subject : GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues
Submitter : Doug Bazarnic <doug-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-09 21:26 (46 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123153653120204&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12411] 2.6.28: BUG in r8169
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Vul, Francois Romieu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Subject : 2.6.28: BUG in r8169
Submitter : Andrey Vul <andrey.vul-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-12-31 18:37 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123074869611409&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12559] Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, fangxiaozhi, kpalberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12500] r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12500
Subject : r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-13 21:19 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188160811322&w=4
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Kevin Shanahan, Kevin Shanahan,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
Subject : KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Submitter : Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah-biM/RbsGxha6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Kevin Shanahan, Kevin Shanahan,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
Subject : KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Submitter : Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>
Date : 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 0:59 ` Kevin Shanahan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Shanahan @ 2009-02-24 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Yes, the problem should still be listed.
The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
Regards,
Kevin.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
> Subject : KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
> Submitter : Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah-biM/RbsGxha6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
@ 2009-02-24 0:59 ` Kevin Shanahan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Shanahan @ 2009-02-24 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Yes, the problem should still be listed.
The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
Regards,
Kevin.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
> Subject : KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
> Submitter : Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>
> Date : 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1235437183.4988.2.camel-9TBizaOOD0ujuAshGpSIhRCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
2009-02-24 0:59 ` Kevin Shanahan
@ 2009-02-24 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-24 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Shanahan
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
@ 2009-02-24 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-24 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Shanahan
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
2009-02-24 0:59 ` Kevin Shanahan
@ 2009-02-24 12:09 ` Avi Kivity
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-02-24 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Shanahan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
>
Did tracing turn anything up?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
@ 2009-02-24 12:09 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2009-02-24 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Shanahan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
>
Did tracing turn anything up?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <49A3E38F.7080306-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
2009-02-24 12:09 ` Avi Kivity
@ 2009-02-24 22:11 ` Kevin Shanahan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Shanahan @ 2009-02-24 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let me know (either way).
> >>
> >
> > Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
> >
>
> Did tracing turn anything up?
I provided some more traces using Ingo's "tip" branch, but I don't think
anyone has looked at them yet.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465#c11
I can provide more traces if e.g. a different set of functions is
required, but I'm not going to be able to analyse them properly myself.
I should have a bit more time for testing next week and I plan to try
setting up the guest with the different virtual network adapters models
to see if that helps.
Cheers,
Kevin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
@ 2009-02-24 22:11 ` Kevin Shanahan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Shanahan @ 2009-02-24 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let me know (either way).
> >>
> >
> > Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
> >
>
> Did tracing turn anything up?
I provided some more traces using Ingo's "tip" branch, but I don't think
anyone has looked at them yet.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465#c11
I can provide more traces if e.g. a different set of functions is
required, but I'm not going to be able to analyse them properly myself.
I should have a bit more time for testing next week and I plan to try
setting up the guest with the different virtual network adapters models
to see if that helps.
Cheers,
Kevin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12619] Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jan sonnek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12619
Subject : Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed
Submitter : jan sonnek <ha2nny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-01 19:59 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123351836213969&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12612] hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, FUJITA Tomonori, Matthias Reichl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12612
Subject : hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav
Submitter : Matthias Reichl <hias-vtPv7MOkFPkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-28 16:41 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123316111415677&w=4
Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123371501613019&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12614] WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik,
Philipp Matthias Hahn, Tobias Diedrich, Yinghai Lu, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
Subject : WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e
Submitter : Philipp Matthias Hahn <pmhahn-u4khhh1J0LzF41mA0N3lWw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-01-29 6:31 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123321232825316&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123330459229248&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123411195117835&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12634] video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Raitz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12634
Subject : video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3
Submitter : Bob Raitz <pappy_mcfae-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-04 21:10 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12690] DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Antonin Kolisek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12690
Subject : DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work
Submitter : Antonin Kolisek <akolisek-T3ps84XAcx36AaHJ4hbVU+3CNBr840j2@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-11 09:40 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12759] scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Ingo Molnar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Subject : scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-15 11:44 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123469852817058&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12757] >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Pflug
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
Subject : >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
Submitter : David Pflug <dtpflug-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-17 19:28 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123489904218306&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* [Bug #12645] DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Patrick Walton,
Philipp Kohlbecher
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645
Subject : DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10
Submitter : Patrick Walton <pcwalton-764C0pRuGfqVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-02-06 18:35 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0af40a4b1050c050e62eb1dc30b82d5ab22bf221
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 1:29 ` Greg KH
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2009-02-24 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Natalie Protasevich,
Stable Kernel Team, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds, kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
solve the issue.
This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
said to have broken this device :)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
@ 2009-02-24 1:29 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2009-02-24 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Natalie Protasevich, Stable Kernel Team,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, kpalberg
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
solve the issue.
This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
said to have broken this device :)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20090224012959.GA25443-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
2009-02-24 1:29 ` Greg KH
@ 2009-02-24 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-24 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Natalie Protasevich,
Stable Kernel Team, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds, kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> > Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> > Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
>
> I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
> device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
> solve the issue.
>
> This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
> said to have broken this device :)
OK, the bug is now closed as invalid.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
@ 2009-02-24 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-24 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Natalie Protasevich, Stable Kernel Team,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, kpalberg
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> > Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> > Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
>
> I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
> device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
> solve the issue.
>
> This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
> said to have broken this device :)
OK, the bug is now closed as invalid.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28
2009-02-23 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-24 15:10 ` Alan Stern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 105+ messages in thread
From: Alan Stern @ 2009-02-24 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> Subject : Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> Submitter : kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
This bug has been marked Invalid and Closed.
Alan Stern
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 105+ messages in thread