All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] mm: hold page lock over page_mkwrite
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:02:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090225170240.GL22785@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A5789E.4040600@oracle.com>

(Chris, your point about lock ordering is good. Zach raised the
same one. Thanks for the good catch there guys).

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:58:06AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
> > Is ocfs2 immune to the races that get covered by this patch?
> 
> I haven't the slightest idea.

Well, they would be covered with the new scheme anyway:

 
> > Hmm, actually possibly we can enter page_mkwrite with the page unlocked,
> > but exit with the page locked? Slightly more complex, but should save
> > complexity elsewhere. Yes I think this might be the best way to go.
> 
> That sounds like it would work on first glance, yeah.  Mark will yell at
> us if we've gotten it wrong ;).

OK, thanks. I'll go with that approach and see what happens.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] mm: hold page lock over page_mkwrite
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:02:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090225170240.GL22785@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A5789E.4040600@oracle.com>

(Chris, your point about lock ordering is good. Zach raised the
same one. Thanks for the good catch there guys).

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:58:06AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
> > Is ocfs2 immune to the races that get covered by this patch?
> 
> I haven't the slightest idea.

Well, they would be covered with the new scheme anyway:

 
> > Hmm, actually possibly we can enter page_mkwrite with the page unlocked,
> > but exit with the page locked? Slightly more complex, but should save
> > complexity elsewhere. Yes I think this might be the best way to go.
> 
> That sounds like it would work on first glance, yeah.  Mark will yell at
> us if we've gotten it wrong ;).

OK, thanks. I'll go with that approach and see what happens.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-25 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25  9:36 [patch][rfc] mm: hold page lock over page_mkwrite Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 16:42 ` Zach Brown
2009-02-25 16:55   ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 16:58     ` Zach Brown
2009-02-25 16:58       ` Zach Brown
2009-02-25 17:02       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-02-25 17:02         ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 22:35         ` Mark Fasheh
2009-02-25 16:48 ` Chris Mason
2009-02-26  9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 11:09   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-01  8:17 ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-01 13:50   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02  8:19     ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-02  8:37       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02  8:37         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02 15:26         ` jim owens
2009-03-02 15:26           ` jim owens
2009-03-03  4:33           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-03  4:33             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-03 17:25             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-03 17:25               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-04  4:37               ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-04  4:37                 ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-04  9:23               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-04 18:13                 ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090225170240.GL22785@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.