* [OT] Prefered Endianess for ixp4xx Processors
@ 2009-02-26 4:37 Hans Henry von Tresckow
2009-02-26 19:56 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Henry von Tresckow @ 2009-02-26 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: oe-devel
Hi,
Sorry if this is way off topic, but I was wondering if there are any
advantages running an ixp4xx in either BE or LE mode
--
Henry von Tresckow (hvontres)
Fran Lebowitz - "You're only has good as your last haircut."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT] Prefered Endianess for ixp4xx Processors
2009-02-26 4:37 [OT] Prefered Endianess for ixp4xx Processors Hans Henry von Tresckow
@ 2009-02-26 19:56 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2009-02-26 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On (25/02/09 20:37), Hans Henry von Tresckow wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry if this is way off topic, but I was wondering if there are any
> advantages running an ixp4xx in either BE or LE mode
Depends on your needs. If you are looking for network processors then
the incoming data could be big endian format so if you use in BE mode
you avoid swapping.
In LE machine you can access least signicant bits with same address and on
BE machine you have immediate access to sign bit. etc etc.
-Khem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-26 20:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-26 4:37 [OT] Prefered Endianess for ixp4xx Processors Hans Henry von Tresckow
2009-02-26 19:56 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.