From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/24] libfc: fixed a read IO data integrity issue when a IO data frame lost
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090227185507.25509.87242.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227185430.25509.34309.stgit@fritz>
From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
The fc_fcp_complete_locked detected data underrun in this case and set
the FC_DATA_UNDRUN but that was ignored by fc_io_compl for all cases
including read underrun.
Added code to not to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for read IO and instead
suggested scsi-ml to retry cmd to recover from lost data frame.
Not sure if it is okay to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for other case, so let
code as is for other cases but removed or-ing with zero valued fsp->cdb_status
for those cases.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
index f440aac..ecc7261 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
@@ -1810,12 +1810,12 @@ static void fc_io_compl(struct fc_fcp_pkt *fsp)
sc_cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
break;
case FC_DATA_UNDRUN:
- if (fsp->cdb_status == 0) {
+ if ((fsp->cdb_status == 0) && !(fsp->req_flags & FC_SRB_READ)) {
/*
* scsi status is good but transport level
- * underrun. for read it should be an error??
+ * underrun.
*/
- sc_cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16) | fsp->cdb_status;
+ sc_cmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
} else {
/*
* scsi got underrun, this is an error
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 18:54 [PATCH 00/24] libfc and fcoe fixes for 2.6.29-rc Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 01/24] libfc: Pass lport in exch_mgr_reset Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 02/24] libfc: when rport goes away (re-plogi), clean up exchanges to/from rport Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 03/24] libfc: handle RRQ exch timeout Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 04/24] libfc: fixed a soft lockup issue in fc_exch_recv_abts Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 05/24] libfc, fcoe: fixed locking issues with lport->lp_mutex around lport->link_status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 06/24] libfc: rport retry on LS_RJT from certain ELS Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 08/24] libfc: exch mgr is freed while lport still retrying sequences Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 09/24] libfc: Don't violate transport template for rogue port creation Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 10/24] libfc: correct RPORT_TO_PRIV usage Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 11/24] libfc: rename rp to rdata in fc_disc_new_target() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 12/24] libfc: check for err when recv and state is incorrect Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 13/24] libfc: Cleanup libfc_function_template comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 14/24] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 15/24] libfc, fcoe: Cleanup function formatting and minor typos Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 16/24] libfc, fcoe: Remove unnecessary cast by removing inline wrapper Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 17/24] fcoe: Use setup_timer() and mod_timer() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 18/24] fcoe: Correct fcoe_transports initialization vs. registration Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 19/24] libfc: do not change the fh_rx_id of a recevied frame Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 20/24] fcoe: ETH_P_8021Q is already in if_ether and fcoe is not using it anyway Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 21/24] fcoe: fix kfree(skb) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 22/24] fcoe: Out of order tx frames was causing several check condition SCSI status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 23/24] fcoe: fix handling of pending queue, prevent out of order frames (v3) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 24/24] fcoe: Change fcoe receive thread nice value from 19 (lowest priority) to -20 Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090227185507.25509.87242.stgit@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.