All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: containers
	<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan
	<adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:14:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228021412.GD19872@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227203431.D1E697CB@kernel>

Dave Hansen [dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org] wrote:
| 
| We have set up sane defaults for how filesystems should
| be checkpointed.  However, as usual in the VFS, there
| are specialized places that will always need an ability
| to override these defaults.
| 
| This adds a new 'file_operations' function for
| checkpointing a file.  I did this under the assumption
| that we should have a dirt-simple way to make something
| (un)checkpointable that fits in with current code.
| 
| As you can see in the /dev/null patch in a second, all
| that we have to do to make something like /dev/null
| supported is add a single "generic" f_op entry.
| 
| Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
| ---
| 
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c     |   77 ++++++++++++++++----------
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/include/linux/checkpoint.h |    6 ++
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/include/linux/fs.h         |    4 +
|  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
| 
| diff -puN checkpoint/ckpt_file.c~f_op-for-checkpointability checkpoint/ckpt_file.c
| --- linux-2.6.git/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c~f_op-for-checkpointability	2009-02-27 12:07:39.000000000 -0800
| +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c	2009-02-27 12:07:39.000000000 -0800
| @@ -104,56 +104,79 @@ int cr_explain_file(struct file *file, c
|  	return 0;
|  }
| 
| -int cr_file_supported(struct file *file)
| +typedef int (do_checkpoint_t)(struct file *, struct cr_ctx *,
| +			      struct cr_hdr_fd *);
| +
| +int generic_file_checkpoint(struct file *file, struct cr_ctx *ctx,
| +			 struct cr_hdr_fd *hh)
| +{
| +	/*
| +	 * A NULL hh means to make a trial run not
| +	 * actually writing data.  Just determine
| +	 * if the file is checkpointable.
| +	 */
| +	if (!hh)
| +		return 0;
| +
| +	hh->f_flags = file->f_flags;
| +	hh->f_mode = file->f_mode;
| +	hh->f_pos = file->f_pos;
| +	hh->f_version = file->f_version;
| +	/* FIX: need also file->uid, file->gid, file->f_owner, etc */
| +
| +	return 0;
| +}
| +
| +do_checkpoint_t *cr_file_get_func(struct file *file)
|  {

Do we really need this helper ? IOW do callers need this function pointer
itself ? Or can we have a more generic helper that callers can use both
check if checkpoint is possible (pass NULL in ctx and hh) and to actually
checkpoint. Something like:

	int cr_file_checkpoint(file, ctx, hh)
	{
		int rc = -1;

		if (!cr_fs_checkpointable(fstype))
			return rc;
		
		if (!cr_file_checkpointable(file))
			return rc;

		if (special_file(file))
			return rc;

		op = file->f_op->checkpoint;
		if (!op)
			op = generic_file_checkpoint;

		return (*op)(file, ctx, hh);
	}



|  	struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
|  	struct file_system_type *fs_type = inode->i_sb->s_type;
| 
| -	if (fs_is_cr_able(fs_type))
| -		return 0;
| +	if (file->f_op->checkpoint)
| +		return file->f_op->checkpoint;
| +
| +	if (!fs_is_cr_able(fs_type))
| +		return NULL;
| 
|  	if (special_file(inode->i_mode))
| -		return 0;
| +		return NULL;
| 
| -	return 1;
| +	return generic_file_checkpoint;
| +}
| +
| +int cr_file_supported(struct file *file)
| +{
| +	do_checkpoint_t *func = cr_file_get_func(file);
| +
| +	if (func)
| +		return !func(file, NULL, NULL);
| +
| +	return 0;
|  }
| 
|  /* cr_write_fd_data - dump the state of a given file pointer */
|  static int cr_write_fd_data(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct file *file, int parent)
|  {
| +	do_checkpoint_t *ckpt_func;
|  	struct cr_hdr h;
|  	struct cr_hdr_fd *hh = cr_hbuf_get(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
| -	struct dentry *dent = file->f_dentry;
| -	struct inode *inode = dent->d_inode;
| -	enum fd_type fd_type;
|  	int ret;
| 
|  	h.type = CR_HDR_FD_DATA;
|  	h.len = sizeof(*hh);
|  	h.parent = parent;
| 
| -	hh->f_flags = file->f_flags;
| -	hh->f_mode = file->f_mode;
| -	hh->f_pos = file->f_pos;
| -	hh->f_version = file->f_version;
| -	/* FIX: need also file->uid, file->gid, file->f_owner, etc */
| -
| -	switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
| -	case S_IFREG:
| -		fd_type = CR_FD_FILE;
| -		break;
| -	case S_IFDIR:
| -		fd_type = CR_FD_DIR;
| -		break;
| -	default:
| -		cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
| -		return -EBADF;
| -	}
| +	ckpt_func = cr_file_get_func(file);
| +	ret = -EBADF;
| +	if (!ckpt_func)
| +		goto out;
| 
| -	/* FIX: check if the file/dir/link is unlinked */
| -	hh->fd_type = fd_type;
| +	ret = ckpt_func(file, ctx, hh);
| +	if (ret)
| +		goto out;

So we can combine these two steps into just one ?

	ret = -EBADF;
	hh->fd_type = fd_type;
	if (cr_file_checkpoint(file, ctx, hh))
		goto out;

| 
|  	ret = cr_write_obj(ctx, &h, hh);
| +out:
|  	cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
|  	if (ret < 0)
|  		return ret;

Sukadev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:14:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228021412.GD19872@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227203431.D1E697CB@kernel>

Dave Hansen [dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
| 
| We have set up sane defaults for how filesystems should
| be checkpointed.  However, as usual in the VFS, there
| are specialized places that will always need an ability
| to override these defaults.
| 
| This adds a new 'file_operations' function for
| checkpointing a file.  I did this under the assumption
| that we should have a dirt-simple way to make something
| (un)checkpointable that fits in with current code.
| 
| As you can see in the /dev/null patch in a second, all
| that we have to do to make something like /dev/null
| supported is add a single "generic" f_op entry.
| 
| Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
| ---
| 
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c     |   77 ++++++++++++++++----------
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/include/linux/checkpoint.h |    6 ++
|  linux-2.6.git-dave/include/linux/fs.h         |    4 +
|  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
| 
| diff -puN checkpoint/ckpt_file.c~f_op-for-checkpointability checkpoint/ckpt_file.c
| --- linux-2.6.git/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c~f_op-for-checkpointability	2009-02-27 12:07:39.000000000 -0800
| +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c	2009-02-27 12:07:39.000000000 -0800
| @@ -104,56 +104,79 @@ int cr_explain_file(struct file *file, c
|  	return 0;
|  }
| 
| -int cr_file_supported(struct file *file)
| +typedef int (do_checkpoint_t)(struct file *, struct cr_ctx *,
| +			      struct cr_hdr_fd *);
| +
| +int generic_file_checkpoint(struct file *file, struct cr_ctx *ctx,
| +			 struct cr_hdr_fd *hh)
| +{
| +	/*
| +	 * A NULL hh means to make a trial run not
| +	 * actually writing data.  Just determine
| +	 * if the file is checkpointable.
| +	 */
| +	if (!hh)
| +		return 0;
| +
| +	hh->f_flags = file->f_flags;
| +	hh->f_mode = file->f_mode;
| +	hh->f_pos = file->f_pos;
| +	hh->f_version = file->f_version;
| +	/* FIX: need also file->uid, file->gid, file->f_owner, etc */
| +
| +	return 0;
| +}
| +
| +do_checkpoint_t *cr_file_get_func(struct file *file)
|  {

Do we really need this helper ? IOW do callers need this function pointer
itself ? Or can we have a more generic helper that callers can use both
check if checkpoint is possible (pass NULL in ctx and hh) and to actually
checkpoint. Something like:

	int cr_file_checkpoint(file, ctx, hh)
	{
		int rc = -1;

		if (!cr_fs_checkpointable(fstype))
			return rc;
		
		if (!cr_file_checkpointable(file))
			return rc;

		if (special_file(file))
			return rc;

		op = file->f_op->checkpoint;
		if (!op)
			op = generic_file_checkpoint;

		return (*op)(file, ctx, hh);
	}



|  	struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
|  	struct file_system_type *fs_type = inode->i_sb->s_type;
| 
| -	if (fs_is_cr_able(fs_type))
| -		return 0;
| +	if (file->f_op->checkpoint)
| +		return file->f_op->checkpoint;
| +
| +	if (!fs_is_cr_able(fs_type))
| +		return NULL;
| 
|  	if (special_file(inode->i_mode))
| -		return 0;
| +		return NULL;
| 
| -	return 1;
| +	return generic_file_checkpoint;
| +}
| +
| +int cr_file_supported(struct file *file)
| +{
| +	do_checkpoint_t *func = cr_file_get_func(file);
| +
| +	if (func)
| +		return !func(file, NULL, NULL);
| +
| +	return 0;
|  }
| 
|  /* cr_write_fd_data - dump the state of a given file pointer */
|  static int cr_write_fd_data(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct file *file, int parent)
|  {
| +	do_checkpoint_t *ckpt_func;
|  	struct cr_hdr h;
|  	struct cr_hdr_fd *hh = cr_hbuf_get(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
| -	struct dentry *dent = file->f_dentry;
| -	struct inode *inode = dent->d_inode;
| -	enum fd_type fd_type;
|  	int ret;
| 
|  	h.type = CR_HDR_FD_DATA;
|  	h.len = sizeof(*hh);
|  	h.parent = parent;
| 
| -	hh->f_flags = file->f_flags;
| -	hh->f_mode = file->f_mode;
| -	hh->f_pos = file->f_pos;
| -	hh->f_version = file->f_version;
| -	/* FIX: need also file->uid, file->gid, file->f_owner, etc */
| -
| -	switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
| -	case S_IFREG:
| -		fd_type = CR_FD_FILE;
| -		break;
| -	case S_IFDIR:
| -		fd_type = CR_FD_DIR;
| -		break;
| -	default:
| -		cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
| -		return -EBADF;
| -	}
| +	ckpt_func = cr_file_get_func(file);
| +	ret = -EBADF;
| +	if (!ckpt_func)
| +		goto out;
| 
| -	/* FIX: check if the file/dir/link is unlinked */
| -	hh->fd_type = fd_type;
| +	ret = ckpt_func(file, ctx, hh);
| +	if (ret)
| +		goto out;

So we can combine these two steps into just one ?

	ret = -EBADF;
	hh->fd_type = fd_type;
	if (cr_file_checkpoint(file, ctx, hh))
		goto out;

| 
|  	ret = cr_write_obj(ctx, &h, hh);
| +out:
|  	cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
|  	if (ret < 0)
|  		return ret;

Sukadev

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-28  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 20:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/8] kill '_data' in cr_hdr_fd_data name Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8] breakout fdinfo sprintf() into its own function Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:56   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-27 21:23     ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]     ` <19f34abd0902271256r49a06336rcba56234c06645a7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-27 21:23       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:56   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8] create fs flags to mark c/r supported fs's Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:16   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 21:16     ` Alexey Dobriyan
     [not found]     ` <20090227211620.GA3326-2ev+ksY9ol182hYKe6nXyg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-27 21:20       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:20     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8] file c/r: expose functions to query fs support Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 21:24     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:32       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:32       ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]     ` <20090227211408.GB19872-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-27 21:24       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28  1:33   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28  1:33   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8] add f_op for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:14   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2009-02-28  2:14     ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
     [not found]     ` <20090228021412.GD19872-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-28  2:51       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:51     ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28 20:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-28 20:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-28 21:37     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 15:19       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-01 15:19       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:05     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-03 13:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]         ` <20090303131528.GB10931-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-20 21:13           ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-20 21:13         ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-20 21:30           ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-20 21:30           ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-03 13:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20090228205329.GB4254-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-28 21:37       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:05       ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mark /dev/null and zero as checkpointable Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8] add c/r info to fdinfo Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8] check files for checkpointability Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 20:34   ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-28  2:57   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-28  2:57   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-01 17:00     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-04 23:41     ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]     ` <20090228025743.GA22451-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-01 17:00       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-04 23:41       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 19:43   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-01 19:43   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 13:37   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 13:37   ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]     ` <20090302133754.GA8033-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-02 15:56       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 15:59       ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 15:56     ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 15:59     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-03-02 16:27       ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:22         ` Nathan Lynch
     [not found]           ` <20090302112247.76bb3662-4v5LP+xe+1byhTdZtsIeww@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-02 17:30             ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:30           ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 17:44             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:58               ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]               ` <20090302174433.GA12708-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-02 17:58                 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:13                 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:13                   ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 18:35                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 18:35                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-05  8:20                   ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-05  8:20                   ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-02 17:44             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 17:22         ` Nathan Lynch
     [not found]       ` <20090302095917.6cfeda55-4v5LP+xe+1byhTdZtsIeww@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-02 16:27         ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-02 16:28         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-02 16:28       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090228021412.GD19872@us.ibm.com \
    --to=sukadev-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.