Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] lm90: Support the MAX6648/6692 chips

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:47:46 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:04:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:01:06 -0800
> > "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -776,7 +776,12 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client, int kind,
> > >  			 && (reg_config1 & 0x3f) = 0x00
> > >  			 && reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
> > >  				kind = max6646;
> > > -			}
> > > +			} else
> > > +			/* The MAX6648/6692 chips have a working man/chip id
> > > +			 * and the same register set as the 6657.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (chip_id = 0x59 && address = 0x4C)
> > > +				kind = max6657;
> > >  		}
> > 
> > gack, the indenting and layout there is totally busted.
> 
> This specific layout is consistently used through the whole function,
> and checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it. While unconventional, it
> has its advantages, in particular it avoids extra indentation that
> would make some lines too long. At any rate it doesn't make sense to
> change this last chunk without changing all the rest if this layout is
> deemed unacceptable.

lol, be serious.

> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c~lm90-support-the-max6648-6692-chips-fix
> > +++ a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> > @@ -776,12 +776,14 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client
> >  			 && (reg_config1 & 0x3f) = 0x00
> >  			 && reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
> >  				kind = max6646;
> > -			} else
> > -			/* The MAX6648/6692 chips have a working man/chip id
> > -			 * and the same register set as the 6657.
> > -			 */
> > -			if (chip_id = 0x59 && address = 0x4C)
> > +			} else if (chip_id = 0x59 && address = 0x4C) {
> > +				/*
> > +				 * The MAX6648/6692 chips have a working
> > +				 * man/chip id and the same register set as the
> > +				 * 6657.
> > +				 */
> >  				kind = max6657;
> > +			}
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (kind <= 0) { /* identification failed */
> 
> I thus nack this change of yours.

Something like this...

diff -puN drivers/hwmon/lm90.c~drivers-hwmon-lm90c-fix-coding-style drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c~drivers-hwmon-lm90c-fix-coding-style
+++ a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -694,22 +694,22 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client
 						LM90_REG_R_CONVRATE)) < 0)
 			return -ENODEV;
 		
-		if ((address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D)
-		 && man_id = 0x01) { /* National Semiconductor */
+		if ((address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D) && man_id = 0x01) {
+			/* National Semiconductor */
 			int reg_config2;
 
 			if ((reg_config2 = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(new_client,
 						LM90_REG_R_CONFIG2)) < 0)
 				return -ENODEV;
 
-			if ((reg_config1 & 0x2A) = 0x00
-			 && (reg_config2 & 0xF8) = 0x00
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x09) {
-				if (address = 0x4C
-				 && (chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x20) { /* LM90 */
+			if ((reg_config1 & 0x2A) = 0x00 &&
+			    (reg_config2 & 0xF8) = 0x00 &&
+			    reg_convrate <= 0x09) {
+				if (address = 0x4C &&
+				    (chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x20) { /* LM90 */
 					kind = lm90;
-				} else
-				if ((chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x30) { /* LM89/LM99 */
+				} else if ((chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x30) {
+					/* LM89/LM99 */
 					kind = lm99;
 					dev_info(&adapter->dev,
 						 "Assuming LM99 chip at "
@@ -720,27 +720,24 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client
 						 "loading the lm90 driver\n",
 						 i2c_adapter_id(adapter),
 						 address);
-				} else
-				if (address = 0x4C
-				 && (chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x10) { /* LM86 */
+				} else if (address = 0x4C &&
+					(chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x10) { /* LM86 */
 					kind = lm86;
 				}
 			}
-		} else
-		if ((address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D)
-		 && man_id = 0x41) { /* Analog Devices */
-			if ((chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x40 /* ADM1032 */
-			 && (reg_config1 & 0x3F) = 0x00
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x0A) {
+		} else if ((address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D) &&
+				man_id = 0x41) {
+			/* Analog Devices */
+			if ((chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x40  && /* ADM1032 */
+			    (reg_config1 & 0x3F) = 0x00 &&
+			    reg_convrate <= 0x0A) {
 				kind = adm1032;
-			} else
-			if (chip_id = 0x51 /* ADT7461 */
-			 && (reg_config1 & 0x1B) = 0x00
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x0A) {
+			} else if (chip_id = 0x51 && /* ADT7461 */
+				 (reg_config1 & 0x1B) = 0x00 &&
+				 reg_convrate <= 0x0A) {
 				kind = adt7461;
 			}
-		} else
-		if (man_id = 0x4D) { /* Maxim */
+		} else if (man_id = 0x4D) { /* Maxim */
 			/*
 			 * The MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659 do NOT have a
 			 * chip_id register. Reading from that address will
@@ -750,31 +747,32 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client
 			 * will be those of the previous read, so in our case
 			 * those of the man_id register.
 			 */
-			if (chip_id = man_id
-			 && (address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D)
-			 && (reg_config1 & 0x1F) = (man_id & 0x0F)
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x09) {
+			if (chip_id = man_id &&
+			    (address = 0x4C || address = 0x4D) &&
+			    (reg_config1 & 0x1F) = (man_id & 0x0F) &&
+			    reg_convrate <= 0x09) {
 			 	kind = max6657;
-			} else
-			/* The chip_id register of the MAX6680 and MAX6681
-			 * holds the revision of the chip.
-			 * the lowest bit of the config1 register is unused
-			 * and should return zero when read, so should the
-			 * second to last bit of config1 (software reset)
-			 */
-			if (chip_id = 0x01
-			 && (reg_config1 & 0x03) = 0x00
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
+			} else if (chip_id = 0x01 &&
+					(reg_config1 & 0x03) = 0x00 &&
+				 	reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
+				/*
+				 * The chip_id register of the MAX6680 and
+				 * MAX6681 holds the revision of the chip.
+				 * the lowest bit of the config1 register is
+				 * unused and should return zero when read, so
+				 * should the second to last bit of config1
+				 * (software reset)
+				 */
 			 	kind = max6680;
-			} else
-			/* The chip_id register of the MAX6646/6647/6649
-			 * holds the revision of the chip.
-			 * The lowest 6 bits of the config1 register are
-			 * unused and should return zero when read.
-			 */
-			if (chip_id = 0x59
-			 && (reg_config1 & 0x3f) = 0x00
-			 && reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
+			} else if (chip_id = 0x59 &&
+					(reg_config1 & 0x3f) = 0x00 &&
+					 reg_convrate <= 0x07) {
+				/*
+				 * The chip_id register of the MAX6646/6647/6649
+				 * holds the revision of the chip.
+				 * The lowest 6 bits of the config1 register are
+				 * unused and should return zero when read.
+				 */
 				kind = max6646;
 			} else if (chip_id = 0x59 && address = 0x4C) {
 				/*
_


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors