All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:32:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>

> >>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
> > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
> > latter)
>
> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).

Paul

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:32:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>

> >>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
> > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
> > latter)
>
> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-05 18:54 [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Anthony Liguori
2009-03-05 20:10 ` Ryan Harper
2009-03-05 20:33   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-06  6:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-06 10:19   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-08 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-08 15:22   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-08 15:31     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-08 16:12       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-08 17:16         ` Andreas Färber
2009-03-08 18:10           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-09  8:48         ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-03-09  8:48           ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-03-10 14:24           ` [Bulk] " Doug Schaefer
2009-03-10 14:24             ` Doug Schaefer
2009-03-10 14:34           ` Paul Brook
2009-03-10 14:46             ` Dietmar Maurer
2009-03-11  8:50               ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-03-09 10:06         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-03-09 12:32     ` Paul Brook [this message]
2009-03-09 12:32       ` Paul Brook
2009-03-09 12:38       ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 12:38         ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 13:40       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-09 13:40         ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.