* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12860] New: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or listen()
[not found] <bug-12860-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2009-03-12 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-03-12 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: bugme-daemon, cristiklein
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12860
>
> Summary: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or
> listen()
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.18
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: cristiklein@gmail.com
>
>
> Problem Description:
>
> Calling setsockopt() with SO_RCVBUF or SO_SNDBUF after connect() or listen()
> makes sockets have a horrible performance. Moreover, getsockopt() returns
> values as if the previous setsockopt() was successful.
>
> Solution:
>
> 1) Document this somewhere in the man-pages (e.g. socket(7))
> 2) Make setsockopt() fail after connect() or listen()
>
> If you need an example code, I'll be happy to provide it.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-03-12 20:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-12860-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-03-12 20:13 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12860] New: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or listen() Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.