All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:26:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319085628.GA6167@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090318215812.15496a86@infradead.org>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the input layer does a "synchronize_rcu()" after a list_add_tail_rcu(), which
> is costing me 1 second of boot time.....
> And based on my understanding of the RCU concept, you only need to synchronize on delete,
> not on addition... so I think the synchronize is entirely redundant here...
> 

The more appropriate question is - why is synchronize_rcu() taking
1 second ? Any idea what the other CPUs are doing at the time
of calling synchronize_rcu() ? What driver is this ? How early
in the boot is this happening ? 

Thanks
Dipankar

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19  4:58 Question about usage of RCU in the input layer Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-19  7:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-03-19 14:02   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-19  8:56 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2009-03-19 14:18   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20  2:07     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20  3:20       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20  4:45         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20  5:28           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20  6:01             ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-03-20  6:01               ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-03-20  6:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20  6:35                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20 13:50           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20 14:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20 18:13               ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21  1:27                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21  4:58                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21 18:58                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 19:51                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21 20:26                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21 20:26                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21 21:07                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 21:07                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  3:40                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  3:40                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  4:38                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  4:38                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  4:51                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  4:51                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  5:18                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  5:53                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22 16:53                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 19:46                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22 20:52                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 22:44                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22 23:03                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 23:16                                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-23  1:27                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-03  1:27                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 21:13                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20 22:21               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21  5:46         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-03-21  9:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21  9:13             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21 18:58             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 18:58               ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090319085628.GA6167@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.