[PATCH 12/14] readahead: sequential mmap readahead

[Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: readahead-mmap-sequential-readahead.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1796 bytes --]

Auto-detect sequential mmap reads and do readahead for them.

The sequential mmap readahead will be triggered when
- sync readahead: it's a major fault and (prev_offset == offset-1);
- async readahead: minor fault on PG_readahead page with valid readahead state.

The benefits of doing readahead instead of read-around:
- less I/O wait thanks to async readahead
- double real I/O size and no more cache hits

The single stream case is improved a little.
For 100,000 sequential mmap reads:

                                    user       system    cpu        total
(1-1)  plain -mm, 128KB readaround: 3.224      2.554     48.40%     11.838
(1-2)  plain -mm, 256KB readaround: 3.170      2.392     46.20%     11.976
(2)  patched -mm, 128KB readahead:  3.117      2.448     47.33%     11.607

The patched (2) has smallest total time, since it has no cache hit overheads
and less I/O block time(thanks to async readahead). Here the I/O size
makes no much difference, since there's only one single stream.

Note that (1-1)'s real I/O size is 64KB and (1-2)'s real I/O size is 128KB,
since the half of the read-around pages will be readahead cache hits.

This is going to make _real_ differences for _concurrent_ IO streams.

Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 mm/filemap.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- mm.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ mm/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1540,7 +1540,8 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struc
 	if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
 		return;
 
-	if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
+	if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma) ||
+			offset - 1 == (ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)) {
 		page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset, 1);
 		return;
 	}

--