All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate
@ 2009-04-14 18:17 Jiri Pirko
  2009-04-15  0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
  2009-04-15 10:13 ` [tip:core/rcu] " tip-bot for Jiri Pirko
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2009-04-14 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: dipankar, paulmck, mingo

Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of list_entry + rcu_dereference
combination.

Jirka

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h           |    8 +++++---
 ipc/sem.c                       |    4 ++--
 security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c |    4 ++--
 security/smack/smackfs.c        |    8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4c38bc..886df41 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct sched_param {
 #include <linux/proportions.h>
 #include <linux/seccomp.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
 
 #include <linux/time.h>
@@ -2010,7 +2011,8 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
 }
 #endif
 
-#define next_task(p)	list_entry(rcu_dereference((p)->tasks.next), struct task_struct, tasks)
+#define next_task(p) \
+	list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)
 
 #define for_each_process(p) \
 	for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
@@ -2049,8 +2051,8 @@ int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
 
 static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
-			  struct task_struct, thread_group);
+	return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
+			      struct task_struct, thread_group);
 }
 
 static inline int thread_group_empty(struct task_struct *p)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 16a2189..87c2b64 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1290,8 +1290,8 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		int i;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		un = list_entry(rcu_dereference(ulp->list_proc.next),
-					struct sem_undo, list_proc);
+		un = list_entry_rcu(ulp->list_proc.next,
+				    struct sem_undo, list_proc);
 		if (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc)
 			semid = -1;
 		 else
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index ffbe259..510186f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	 * against concurrent list-extension
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	qe = list_entry(rcu_dereference(qe->later.next),
-			struct ima_queue_entry, later);
+	qe = list_entry_rcu(qe->later.next,
+			    struct ima_queue_entry, later);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	(*pos)++;
 
diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index e03a7e1..11d2cb1 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
-			 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+	m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
+			   struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 
 	/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
 	if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m->smk_mask.s_addr) {
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
 			return;
 		}
-		m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
-				 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+		m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
+					struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 		if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
 			return;
-- 
1.6.0.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate
  2009-04-14 18:17 [PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate Jiri Pirko
@ 2009-04-15  0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
  2009-04-15 10:13 ` [tip:core/rcu] " tip-bot for Jiri Pirko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2009-04-15  0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Pirko; +Cc: linux-kernel, dipankar, mingo

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of list_entry + rcu_dereference
> combination.
> 
> Jirka

Looks good!

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h           |    8 +++++---
>  ipc/sem.c                       |    4 ++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c |    4 ++--
>  security/smack/smackfs.c        |    8 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index b4c38bc..886df41 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct sched_param {
>  #include <linux/proportions.h>
>  #include <linux/seccomp.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
> 
>  #include <linux/time.h>
> @@ -2010,7 +2011,8 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> -#define next_task(p)	list_entry(rcu_dereference((p)->tasks.next), struct task_struct, tasks)
> +#define next_task(p) \
> +	list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)
> 
>  #define for_each_process(p) \
>  	for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
> @@ -2049,8 +2051,8 @@ int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
> 
>  static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -	return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
> -			  struct task_struct, thread_group);
> +	return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
> +			      struct task_struct, thread_group);
>  }
> 
>  static inline int thread_group_empty(struct task_struct *p)
> diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
> index 16a2189..87c2b64 100644
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -1290,8 +1290,8 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  		int i;
> 
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		un = list_entry(rcu_dereference(ulp->list_proc.next),
> -					struct sem_undo, list_proc);
> +		un = list_entry_rcu(ulp->list_proc.next,
> +				    struct sem_undo, list_proc);
>  		if (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc)
>  			semid = -1;
>  		 else
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> index ffbe259..510186f 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  	 * against concurrent list-extension
>  	 */
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	qe = list_entry(rcu_dereference(qe->later.next),
> -			struct ima_queue_entry, later);
> +	qe = list_entry_rcu(qe->later.next,
> +			    struct ima_queue_entry, later);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	(*pos)++;
> 
> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> index e03a7e1..11d2cb1 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> @@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -	m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
> -			 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
> +	m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
> +			   struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
> 
>  	/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
>  	if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m->smk_mask.s_addr) {
> @@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
>  			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
>  			return;
>  		}
> -		m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
> -				 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
> +		m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
> +					struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
>  		if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
>  			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
>  			return;
> -- 
> 1.6.0.6
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip:core/rcu] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate
  2009-04-14 18:17 [PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate Jiri Pirko
  2009-04-15  0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2009-04-15 10:13 ` tip-bot for Jiri Pirko
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Jiri Pirko @ 2009-04-15 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, paulmck, hpa, mingo, tglx, mingo, jpirko

Commit-ID:  05725f7eb4b8acb147c5fc7b91397b1f6bcab00d
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/05725f7eb4b8acb147c5fc7b91397b1f6bcab00d
Author:     Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:17:16 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:05:25 +0200

rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate

Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of an open-coded
list_entry + rcu_dereference combination.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20090414181715.GA3634@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>


---
 include/linux/sched.h           |    8 +++++---
 ipc/sem.c                       |    4 ++--
 security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c |    4 ++--
 security/smack/smackfs.c        |    8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4c38bc..886df41 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct sched_param {
 #include <linux/proportions.h>
 #include <linux/seccomp.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
 
 #include <linux/time.h>
@@ -2010,7 +2011,8 @@ static inline unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p,
 }
 #endif
 
-#define next_task(p)	list_entry(rcu_dereference((p)->tasks.next), struct task_struct, tasks)
+#define next_task(p) \
+	list_entry_rcu((p)->tasks.next, struct task_struct, tasks)
 
 #define for_each_process(p) \
 	for (p = &init_task ; (p = next_task(p)) != &init_task ; )
@@ -2049,8 +2051,8 @@ int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
 
 static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
-			  struct task_struct, thread_group);
+	return list_entry_rcu(p->thread_group.next,
+			      struct task_struct, thread_group);
 }
 
 static inline int thread_group_empty(struct task_struct *p)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 16a2189..87c2b64 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1290,8 +1290,8 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		int i;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		un = list_entry(rcu_dereference(ulp->list_proc.next),
-					struct sem_undo, list_proc);
+		un = list_entry_rcu(ulp->list_proc.next,
+				    struct sem_undo, list_proc);
 		if (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc)
 			semid = -1;
 		 else
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index ffbe259..510186f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	 * against concurrent list-extension
 	 */
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	qe = list_entry(rcu_dereference(qe->later.next),
-			struct ima_queue_entry, later);
+	qe = list_entry_rcu(qe->later.next,
+			    struct ima_queue_entry, later);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	(*pos)++;
 
diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index e03a7e1..11d2cb1 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
-			 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+	m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
+			   struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 
 	/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
 	if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m->smk_mask.s_addr) {
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ static void smk_netlbladdr_insert(struct smk_netlbladdr *new)
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
 			return;
 		}
-		m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
-				 struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+		m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
+					struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
 		if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
 			list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
 			return;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-15 10:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-14 18:17 [PATCH] rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate Jiri Pirko
2009-04-15  0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-15 10:13 ` [tip:core/rcu] " tip-bot for Jiri Pirko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.