All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Young <dyoung@pobox.com>
To: radiotap@radiotap.org, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal]TX flags
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416153724.GX25412@ojctech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69e28c910904141733m72ce521ap8f1865bec991fff7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:33:05AM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote:
> I propose the following suggested Radiotap features to be standardised:
> 
> * A new, 16-bit wide "TX flags" field (field number 15), containing
> the following flags:
>    - TX failed due to excessive retries,
>    - CTS-to-self protection,
>    - RTS/CTS-handshake,
>    - Frame shall not be ACKed ("No-ACK"), and
>    - Sequence number shall not be recalculated ("No-Seq").

Thanks.

FWIW, these assignments are compatible with NetBSD.  They appear to be
compatible with FreeBSD, too.

> If no one objects to this proposal in 7 days, I will resubmit it as a
> formal RFA, to allow eventual adoption.

Great!

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Young <dyoung-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless
	<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal]TX flags
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:37:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416153724.GX25412@ojctech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69e28c910904141733m72ce521ap8f1865bec991fff7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:33:05AM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote:
> I propose the following suggested Radiotap features to be standardised:
> 
> * A new, 16-bit wide "TX flags" field (field number 15), containing
> the following flags:
>    - TX failed due to excessive retries,
>    - CTS-to-self protection,
>    - RTS/CTS-handshake,
>    - Frame shall not be ACKed ("No-ACK"), and
>    - Sequence number shall not be recalculated ("No-Seq").

Thanks.

FWIW, these assignments are compatible with NetBSD.  They appear to be
compatible with FreeBSD, too.

> If no one objects to this proposal in 7 days, I will resubmit it as a
> formal RFA, to allow eventual adoption.

Great!

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung-eZodSLrBbDpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-16 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-15  0:33 [Proposal]TX flags Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-15  0:33 ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-16 15:37 ` David Young [this message]
2009-04-16 15:37   ` David Young
2009-04-16 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 17:28   ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 18:47   ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-16 18:47     ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-16 18:59     ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 18:59       ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 19:10       ` Michael Buesch
2009-04-16 19:10         ` Michael Buesch
2009-04-16 20:48         ` David Young
2009-04-16 20:48           ` David Young
2009-04-17  1:24           ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-17  1:24             ` Gábor Stefanik
2009-04-17  9:50             ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-17  9:50               ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 20:33       ` David Young
2009-04-16 20:33         ` David Young
2009-04-16 20:48         ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-16 20:48           ` Johannes Berg
2010-03-22 19:32 ` Michael Stahn
2010-03-23  0:42   ` Bruno Randolf
2010-03-23 15:50     ` Michael Stahn
2010-03-24 11:15       ` Bruno Randolf
2010-03-24 19:43         ` Pavel Roskin
2010-03-24 20:26           ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-03-25  1:22             ` Michael Stahn
2010-03-25 20:32               ` Gábor Stefanik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090416153724.GX25412@ojctech.com \
    --to=dyoung@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=radiotap@radiotap.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.