All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keywest: Convert to new-style i2c driver
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:56:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421095604.GC3100@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421114853.7a9d82c1@hyperion.delvare>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]

> Not removing it now has a high risk of developers continuing to ignore
> the deprecation warnings and adding new legacy drivers, which I then
> must convert to the new model. This never ends.
> 
> I know my behavior may seem a bit rude, but apparently this is the only
> way to get things to actually happen. I've been waiting for over a year
> already!
> 
> I don't think the risk is that high, at least not for sound drivers.
> The conversions are fairly easy and if something really went wrong,
> fixing it is a matter of minutes.
> 
> Please note that the removal of the legacy model isn't my goal per se.
> The fact is that the legacy model needs to be removed for further
> developments of i2c-core to happen, in particular the support of i2C
> bus multiplexers. There are patches waiting for inclusion since early
> February, which I can't take as long as the legacy i2c model is in.
> This is why I am pushing.

Full ACK!

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 146 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keywest: Convert to new-style i2c driver
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:56:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090421095604.GC3100@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421114853.7a9d82c1@hyperion.delvare>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]

> Not removing it now has a high risk of developers continuing to ignore
> the deprecation warnings and adding new legacy drivers, which I then
> must convert to the new model. This never ends.
> 
> I know my behavior may seem a bit rude, but apparently this is the only
> way to get things to actually happen. I've been waiting for over a year
> already!
> 
> I don't think the risk is that high, at least not for sound drivers.
> The conversions are fairly easy and if something really went wrong,
> fixing it is a matter of minutes.
> 
> Please note that the removal of the legacy model isn't my goal per se.
> The fact is that the legacy model needs to be removed for further
> developments of i2c-core to happen, in particular the support of i2C
> bus multiplexers. There are patches waiting for inclusion since early
> February, which I can't take as long as the legacy i2c model is in.
> This is why I am pushing.

Full ACK!

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-21  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 20:56 [PATCH] keywest: Convert to new-style i2c driver Jean Delvare
2009-04-20 20:56 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-20 22:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-21  6:33   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  9:33     ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-21  9:36       ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  9:48     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-21  9:56       ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2009-04-21  9:56         ` Wolfram Sang
2009-04-22  9:34       ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-22 12:04         ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-22 12:56           ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-22 14:24             ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-23  9:54             ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-21  6:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  6:31   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  9:23   ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-21  9:23     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-21  9:30     ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  9:30       ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-21  9:44     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-21  9:44       ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090421095604.GC3100@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.