From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163627.24945.23606.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[PATCH 01/08] Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup
Against: numactl-2.0.3-rc2
Kornilios says these [Hunks #1 and 3] are already fixed,
so I pulled them into a separate patch.
Hunk #2 that modifies numa_alloc_local() just reorganizes the code
to match the structure of numa_alloc_onnode() with, I think, no change
in behavior. This is probably not "already fixed".
I suppose I could/should change those '(char *)-1's to MAP_FAILED, too...
libnuma.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 08:47:14.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 09:01:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -919,8 +919,10 @@ void *numa_alloc_onnode(size_t size, int
mem = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
0, 0);
if (mem == (char *)-1)
- return NULL;
- dombind(mem, size, bind_policy, bmp);
+ mem = NULL;
+ else
+ dombind(mem, size, bind_policy, bmp);
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
return mem;
}
@@ -930,8 +932,9 @@ void *numa_alloc_local(size_t size)
mem = mmap(0, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
0, 0);
if (mem == (char *)-1)
- return NULL;
- dombind(mem, size, MPOL_PREFERRED, NULL);
+ mem = NULL;
+ else
+ dombind(mem, size, MPOL_PREFERRED, NULL);
return mem;
}
@@ -1496,7 +1499,7 @@ int numa_run_on_node(int node)
int numa_preferred(void)
{
- int policy;
+ int policy, node = 0;
struct bitmask *bmp;
bmp = numa_allocate_nodemask();
@@ -1505,12 +1508,15 @@ int numa_preferred(void)
int i;
int max = numa_num_possible_nodes();
for (i = 0; i < max ; i++)
- if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, i))
- return i;
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, i)) {
+ node = i;
+ break;
+ }
}
/* could read the current CPU from /proc/self/status. Probably
not worth it. */
- return 0; /* or random one? */
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+ return node;
}
void numa_set_preferred(int node)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428163627.24945.23606.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.