From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more bitmask leak fixes
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163638.24945.53155.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[PATCH 03/08] - reorganize code to plug apparent bitmask leaks
Against: numactl-2.0.3-rc2
The remainder of the fixex for apparent leaks. These required a bit
more reorg to address.
libnuma.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 09:44:52.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 16:49:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -1031,17 +1031,19 @@ numa_get_membind_v1(void)
{
int oldpolicy;
struct bitmask *bmp;
- nodemask_t *nmp;
+ nodemask_t nmp;
bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1();
getpol(&oldpolicy, bmp);
if (oldpolicy == MPOL_BIND) {
- nmp = (nodemask_t *)bmp->maskp;
- return *nmp;
+ copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &nmp);
+ } else {
+ /* copy the body of the map to numa_all_nodes */
+ copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &numa_all_nodes);
+ nmp = numa_all_nodes;
}
- /* copy the body of the map to numa_all_nodes */
- copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &numa_all_nodes);
- return numa_all_nodes;
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+ return nmp;
}
__asm__(".symver numa_get_membind_v1,numa_get_membind@libnuma_1.1");
@@ -1411,14 +1413,16 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v1(void)
int i, k;
int max = numa_max_node_int();
struct bitmask *bmp, *cpus, *nodecpus;
- nodemask_t *nmp;
+ nodemask_t nmp;
- bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1(); /* the size of a nodemask_t */
cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
- nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
- if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0)
- return numa_no_nodes;
+ if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0){
+ nmp = numa_no_nodes;
+ goto free_cpus;
+ }
+ nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
+ bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1(); /* the size of a nodemask_t */
for (i = 0; i <= max; i++) {
if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(i, nodecpus) < 0) {
/* It's possible for the node to not exist */
@@ -1429,8 +1433,12 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v1(void)
numa_bitmask_setbit(bmp, i);
}
}
- nmp = (nodemask_t *)bmp->maskp;
- return *nmp;
+ copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &nmp);
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+ numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
+free_cpus:
+ numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
+ return nmp;
}
__asm__(".symver numa_get_run_node_mask_v1,numa_get_run_node_mask@libnuma_1.1");
@@ -1442,13 +1450,15 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v2(void)
int max = numa_max_node_int();
struct bitmask *bmp, *cpus, *nodecpus;
+
bmp = numa_allocate_cpumask();
cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
- nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-
- if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0)
- return numa_no_nodes_ptr;
+ if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0){
+ copy_bitmask_to_bitmask(numa_no_nodes_ptr, bmp);
+ goto free_cpus;
+ }
+ nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
for (i = 0; i <= max; i++) {
if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(i, nodecpus) < 0) {
/* It's possible for the node to not exist */
@@ -1459,6 +1469,9 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v2(void)
numa_bitmask_setbit(bmp, i);
}
}
+ numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
+free_cpus:
+ numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
return bmp;
}
__asm__(".symver numa_get_run_node_mask_v2,numa_get_run_node_mask@@libnuma_1.2");
@@ -1481,22 +1494,28 @@ int numa_move_pages(int pid, unsigned lo
int numa_run_on_node(int node)
{
int numa_num_nodes = numa_num_possible_nodes();
+ int ret = -1;
struct bitmask *cpus;
+ if (node >= numa_num_nodes){
+ errno = EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
- if (node == -1) {
+
+ if (node == -1)
numa_bitmask_setall(cpus);
- } else if (node < numa_num_nodes) {
- if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, cpus) < 0) {
- numa_warn(W_noderunmask,
- "Cannot read node cpumask from sysfs");
- return -1;
- }
- } else {
- errno = EINVAL;
- return -1;
+ else if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, cpus) < 0){
+ numa_warn(W_noderunmask, "Cannot read node cpumask from sysfs");
+ goto free;
}
- return numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus);
+
+ ret = numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus);
+free:
+ numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
+out:
+ return ret;
}
int numa_preferred(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428163638.24945.53155.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.