From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de>,
Heinz-Josef Claes <hjclaes@web.de>,
Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:06:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090429000617.GA14794@brong.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240952295.15136.73.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:58:15PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Assuming a 4 kbyte block size that would mean for a 1 Tbyte
> > filesystem:
> >
> > 1Tbyte / 4096 / 8 = 32 Mbyte of memory (this should of course
> > be saved to disk from time to time and be restored on startup).
> >
>
> Sorry, a 1TB drive is teeny, I don't think a bitmap is practical across
> the whole FS.
32Mbyte of memory is teeny too. You can pick up a server with 32Gb for
about $5k these days. Using 10% of that gives you room for 100Tb of
storage, which is getting to be a reasonable size. More than that and
you would be thinking of bigger machines anyway to have enough memory
for a decent cache.
(32Gb seems to be the nice price point, because 4Gb dimms are cheap as
chips, and 8Gb are way expensive. We're buying 32Gb machines at the
moment)
Bron ( ok, so I don't work with giant enterprise systems. I can see
that there are cases where this might suck, but memory seems
to be growing as fast as disk in the low end )
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 3:33 Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-27 13:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 5:22 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 10:02 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 13:49 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-04-28 13:58 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 14:04 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:21 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:10 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:29 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 13:58 ` jim owens
2009-04-28 16:10 ` Anthony Roberts
2009-04-28 15:59 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 16:04 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-28 17:29 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-04-28 17:34 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:38 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:43 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:45 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:16 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:36 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:52 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:58 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 21:12 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:26 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 22:14 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 23:18 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 12:03 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 13:11 ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-29 13:14 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 13:58 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 14:31 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 15:26 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 15:45 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04 8:49 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 11:43 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04 12:03 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 12:43 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 12:20 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-05 12:50 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 15:35 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-29 0:06 ` Bron Gondwana [this message]
2009-05-06 15:16 ` Sander
2009-04-28 17:32 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:41 ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-28 20:14 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 14:29 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 14:39 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-04 14:45 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 15:15 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:03 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 16:16 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-04 16:24 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 18:06 ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2009-05-04 19:16 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-05 8:02 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:26 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 19:11 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-04 21:29 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-05-05 7:18 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-24 7:27 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:23 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:37 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:43 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:15 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:19 ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-04-28 20:24 ` Thomas Glanzmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090429000617.GA14794@brong.net \
--to=brong@fastmail.fm \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=hjclaes@web.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.