From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.orgMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:19:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904291519.29683.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090420104529.GB6670@elte.hu>
On Monday 20 April 2009 12:45:29 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote:
> > > FYI,
> > > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-)
> > Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60.
> > I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function
> > at all.
> >
> > > and so i put the DSDT here:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139
> > >
> > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon...
> > Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please.
> > This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes
> > as it seem to implement some corner case.
>
> Sure, find it attached below.
>
> Ingo
>
> DSDT @ 0x7f6e65e7
> 0000: 44 53 44 54 65 c7 00 00 01 49 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f
...
Ingo, did you do a BIOS update in between?
The DSDT and SSDTs you added do not contain a _PPC function.
These ACPI tables definitely do not suffer from an initial _PPC
evaluation.
Thomas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:19:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904291519.29683.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090420104529.GB6670@elte.hu>
On Monday 20 April 2009 12:45:29 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote:
> > > FYI,
> > > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-)
> > Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60.
> > I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function
> > at all.
> >
> > > and so i put the DSDT here:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139
> > >
> > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon...
> > Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please.
> > This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes
> > as it seem to implement some corner case.
>
> Sure, find it attached below.
>
> Ingo
>
> DSDT @ 0x7f6e65e7
> 0000: 44 53 44 54 65 c7 00 00 01 49 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f
...
Ingo, did you do a BIOS update in between?
The DSDT and SSDTs you added do not contain a _PPC function.
These ACPI tables definitely do not suffer from an initial _PPC
evaluation.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-15 22:53 [PATCH] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16 0:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16 10:01 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-16 10:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 17:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16 18:49 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-16 22:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-20 5:13 ` Len Brown
2009-04-20 9:13 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-20 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 13:19 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2009-04-29 13:19 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 21:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-30 9:07 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-30 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 22:18 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-28 19:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-28 19:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-28 20:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-29 21:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-29 22:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-30 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 9:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-30 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 11:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-05-15 19:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-06-02 23:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-06-07 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-15 0:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-16 22:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-16 22:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-18 9:02 ` Len Brown
2010-02-18 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-19 6:12 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904291519.29683.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.orgMatthew \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.