From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
chinang.ma@intel.com
Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:25:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511162511.GG8112@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:55PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with
> SLUB on the same machine.
Is it 100% reproducable with SLQB? Our errors were fairly hard to tickle
on demand.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
chinang.ma@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:25:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511162511.GG8112@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:55PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with
> SLUB on the same machine.
Is it 100% reproducable with SLQB? Our errors were fairly hard to tickle
on demand.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 6:14 linux-next: Tree for May 11 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-11 11:46 ` Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization Sachin Sant
2009-05-11 11:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 12:04 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-11 12:04 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-11 12:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 12:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 16:19 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-11 16:19 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-11 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-05-11 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 16:59 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-12 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 5:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 5:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 5:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 5:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 6:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 6:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 6:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 6:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-12 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-12 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-14 8:30 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-14 8:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 8:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 9:54 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-14 9:54 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-14 9:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 9:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 10:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 10:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-14 11:46 ` Sachin Sant
2009-05-14 11:46 ` Sachin Sant
2009-06-05 12:04 ` [Powerpc/SLQB] Next June 06 " Sachin Sant
2009-06-07 8:06 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-08 12:12 ` Sachin Sant
2009-06-09 14:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 14:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 5:44 ` Sachin Sant
2009-06-12 5:44 ` Sachin Sant
2009-06-12 7:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 7:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 8:08 ` Sachin Sant
2009-06-12 8:21 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 8:21 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 8:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 8:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 8:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 8:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-12 8:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-11 16:32 ` [PATCH -next] kvm: fix build error: add missing semi-colon Randy Dunlap
2009-05-12 8:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-11 16:36 ` [PATCH -next] soc_camera: depends on I2C Randy Dunlap
2009-05-11 17:53 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-05-11 16:37 ` [PATCH -next] v4l2: handle unregister for non-I2C builds Randy Dunlap
2009-05-22 5:48 ` Paul Mundt
2009-05-22 7:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-22 15:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-05-26 17:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090511162511.GG8112@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=chinang.ma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.