All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: "João Ramos" <joao.ramos@inov.pt>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:41:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905121841.32576.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A082621.7030008@inov.pt>

On Monday 11 May 2009 15:20:33 João Ramos wrote:
> 
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Well, yes.  Though I hoped that you would at least give a try to fixing
> >>> IDE core to program PIO0 initially for all host drivers that implement
> >>> ->set_pio_mode method...
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Sorry, I didn't noticed your hint... Sure, I can give it a try ;-)
> >> Maybe with a little help, but I can try. You mean, when the host driver 
> >> is registered (ide_host_register, or ide_host_add that later calls 
> >> ide_host_register), maybe in the 'ide_init_port' method (sorry, I need 
> >> some guidance here...) check if the 'set_pio_mode' method is 
> >> implemented, and after initializing each port (d->init_hwif(hwif)) 
> >> default it to PIO Mode 0, calling set_pio_mode method.
> >>     
> >
> > ide_init_port() seems OK but I think that ide_port_init_devices()
> > [it is called after ide_init_port()] would be a bit safer and more
> > flexible (some host drivers may also require special ->init_dev
> > setup first) and the check for ->set_pio_mode method presence can
> > be done just before actually using the method, i.e.
> >
> > 	const struct ide_port_ops *port_ops = hwif->port_ops;
> >
> > 	if (port_ops && port_ops->set_pio_mode)
> > 		port_ops->set_pio_mode(...)
> >
> >   
> 
> Ok, so the patch for this is attached in this e-mail.
> 
> Please confirm and make your comments.

--- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
@@ -1031,6 +1031,13 @@ static void ide_port_init_devices(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
 
 		if (port_ops && port_ops->init_dev)
 			port_ops->init_dev(drive);
+
+		/*
+		 * if driver uses PIO mode, default to PIO Mode 0 before we
+		 * figure out the most suited mode for the attached device
+		 */
+		if (port_ops && port_ops->set_pio_mode)
+			port_ops->set_pio_mode(drive, 0);
 	}
 }
 
Looks good but please move this into a separate ide_port_for_each_dev()
loop (some host drivers require full initial setup of both devices on
the port before ->set_pio_mode can be called).

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-12 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <49CCD7C4.8000207@inov.pt>
     [not found] ` <49CFDD8F.1030306@bluewatersys.com>
     [not found]   ` <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909014E2E09@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
     [not found]     ` <49D0CAE4.9090306@inov.pt>
2009-03-30 15:34       ` EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-04 11:24         ` João Ramos
2009-05-05 12:04           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-06 14:17             ` João Ramos
2009-05-06 17:05               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-07  9:36                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 11:01                   ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 13:53                   ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 15:33                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:04                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 12:16                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:40                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 13:30                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 14:09                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 17:28                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:02                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 18:16                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:55                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 20:24                                 ` joao.ramos
2009-05-08 21:01                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 22:07                                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 11:10                                       ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:49                                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 17:23                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-13 11:01                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 15:20                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-22 17:52                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-13 14:18                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-14 19:44                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-15 17:01                                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 16:16                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-18 13:49                                                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:06                                                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 13:20                                                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:56                                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 14:05                                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 15:50                                                               ` João Ramos
2009-06-06 15:26                                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-06-22 10:01                                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-14 16:30                                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 16:36                                               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 18:58                                                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 13:20                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:41                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-05-12 16:57                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 16:01                           ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:30                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-12 16:45                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 16:52                   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:09                     ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 22:31                       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:51                         ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 23:01                           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 23:12                             ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 23:32                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 23:58                                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-08 11:23                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 12:47                     ` João Ramos
     [not found]       ` <49D12669.4030207@bluewatersys.com>
2009-03-31 10:36         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905121841.32576.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=joao.ramos@inov.pt \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.