All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Cc: "João Ramos" <joao.ramos@inov.pt>,
	"Sergei Shtylyov" <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 11:12:33 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A036AE1.5080706@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE19090172C9E1@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:51 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>>>> You can (and should) use platform_driver_probe and still have
>>>> the module be loadable. For the gpio settings, I think that
>>>> probably the best approach is to use gpio_request for each of
>>>> the gpio pins so that gpio_lib knows that they are in use and
>>>> sysfs/debugfs will correctly show they are assigned to ide,
>>>> and then call ep93xx_ide_on_gpio, so you will have something
>>>> like in your init code:
>>> Hmmm...
>>>
>>> How about doing all the request/free's in the ep93xx_ide_on_gpio()
>>> function?  That way the platform code can initially call it and set
>>> all the pins into gpio mode (freeing them).  Then later when the
>>> IDE driver is loaded it can call the function to try and put the
>>> pins into IDE mode (requesting them).  If any of the pins are
>>> unavailable the ep93xx_ide_on_gpio() function can return the
>>> necessary error code preventing the IDE driver from loading.  When
>>> the driver is unloaded it just needs to call the core to free
>>> the gpio's.
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> int ep93xx_ide_on_gpio(int enable)
>>> {
>>> 	u32 reg;
>>> 	int err;
>>> 	int i;
>>>
>>> 	reg = __raw_read(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG);
>>>
>>> 	if (enable) {
>>> 		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>>> 			err = gpio_request(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_E(i), "ep93xx_ide");
>>> 			if (err)
>>> 				goto fail_gpio_e;
>>> 			err = gpio_request(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F(i), "ep93xx_ide");
>>> 			if (err)
>>> 				goto fail_gpio_f;
>>> 			err = gpio_request(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_G(i), "ep93xx_ide");
>>> 			if (err)
>>> 				goto fail_gpio_g;
>>> 		}
>>> 		reg &= ~(EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_EONIDE |
>>> 			EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_GONIDE |
>>> 			EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_HONIDE);
>>> 	} else {
>>> 		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>>> 			gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_E(i));
>>> 			gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F(i));
>>> 			gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_G(i));
>>> 		}
>>> 		reg |= (EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_EONIDE |
>>> 			EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_GONIDE |
>>> 			EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG_HONIDE);
>>> 	}
>>> 	
>>> 	__raw_writel(0xaa, EP93XX_SYSCON_SWLOCK);
>>> 	__raw_writel(reg, EP93XX_SYSCON_DEVICE_CONFIG);	
>> Is this going to be modified later to use the ep93xx_syscon_ functions
>> once they are merged?
> 
> Yes, hopefully that occurs sometime soon.  Still no responses on it.
> 
>>> 	return 0;
>>>
>>> fail_gpio_g:
>>> 	free_gpio(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F(i);
>>> fail_gpio_f:
>>> 	free_gpio(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_E(i);
>>> fail_gpio_e:
>>> 	for ( ; i >= 0; --i) {
>>> 		free_gpio(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_E(i);
>>> 		free_gpio(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_F(i);
>>> 		free_gpio(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_G(i);
>>> 	}
>>> 	return err;
>>> }
>> Yeah, that makes sense. Keeps the driver nice and clean that way too.
>> The ep93xx_ide_on_gpio function for core.c should be posted as a
>> separate patch though.
>>
> 
> I agree.  Actually that patch needs to go in now so that the port E/F/G
> pins will work for normal GPIO.  The syscon register defaults at reset with
> the bits cleared so the boot state has them set for IDE mode.  That drove
> me nuts for quite a while...
> 
> If wanted I will put together the necessary patch for this.

That would be good. I think that we should default all of the pins to
gpio mode on boot, and then drivers should call into core.c to put pins
in alternative function mode where necessary.

> This function will hopefully get a bit cleaner later.  I've been messing
> with an addition to the GPIOLIB API to add support for "ports".  When/if
> that goes in all the for() loops go away and you just need to do a
> gpio_port_request(...) to grab the pins and gpio_port_free(...) to put
> them back.

It would be nice if gpiolib had some understanding of alternative
function modes for gpios. However I'm not sure that it can be done in a
generic way that will suit all architectures/chips.

> Ahh.. If only the days were longer....

Agreed :-).

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

       Ryan Mallon                              Unit 5, Amuri Park
       Phone: +64 3 3779127                     404 Barbadoes St
       Fax:   +64 3 3779135                     PO Box 13 889
       Email: ryan@bluewatersys.com             Christchurch, 8013
       Web:   http://www.bluewatersys.com       New Zealand
       Freecall Australia  1800 148 751         USA 1800 261 2934

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <49CCD7C4.8000207@inov.pt>
     [not found] ` <49CFDD8F.1030306@bluewatersys.com>
     [not found]   ` <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909014E2E09@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
     [not found]     ` <49D0CAE4.9090306@inov.pt>
2009-03-30 15:34       ` EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-04 11:24         ` João Ramos
2009-05-05 12:04           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-06 14:17             ` João Ramos
2009-05-06 17:05               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-07  9:36                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 11:01                   ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 13:53                   ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 15:33                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:04                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 12:16                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:40                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 13:30                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 14:09                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 17:28                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:02                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 18:16                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:55                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 20:24                                 ` joao.ramos
2009-05-08 21:01                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 22:07                                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 11:10                                       ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:49                                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 17:23                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-13 11:01                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 15:20                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-22 17:52                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-13 14:18                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-14 19:44                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-15 17:01                                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 16:16                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-18 13:49                                                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:06                                                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 13:20                                                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:56                                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 14:05                                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 15:50                                                               ` João Ramos
2009-06-06 15:26                                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-06-22 10:01                                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-14 16:30                                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 16:36                                               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 18:58                                                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 13:20                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:41                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-12 16:57                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 16:01                           ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:30                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-12 16:45                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 16:52                   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:09                     ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 22:31                       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:51                         ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 23:01                           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 23:12                             ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2009-05-07 23:32                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 23:58                                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-08 11:23                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 12:47                     ` João Ramos
     [not found]       ` <49D12669.4030207@bluewatersys.com>
2009-03-31 10:36         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A036AE1.5080706@bluewatersys.com \
    --to=ryan@bluewatersys.com \
    --cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=joao.ramos@inov.pt \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.