From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Peter W Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: do we really want to export more pdflush details in sysctls
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:01:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090513130128.GA10382@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
commit fafd688e4c0c34da0f3de909881117d374e4c7af titled
"mm: add /proc controls for pdflush threads" adds two more sysctl
variables exposing details about pdflush threads. At the same time
Jens Axboe is working on the per-bdi writeback patchset which will
hopefull soon get rid of the pdflush threads in their current form.
Is it really a good idea to expose more details now or should we revert
this patch before 2.6.30 is out?
Cheers,
Christoph
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Peter W Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: do we really want to export more pdflush details in sysctls
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:01:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090513130128.GA10382@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
commit fafd688e4c0c34da0f3de909881117d374e4c7af titled
"mm: add /proc controls for pdflush threads" adds two more sysctl
variables exposing details about pdflush threads. At the same time
Jens Axboe is working on the per-bdi writeback patchset which will
hopefull soon get rid of the pdflush threads in their current form.
Is it really a good idea to expose more details now or should we revert
this patch before 2.6.30 is out?
Cheers,
Christoph
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-13 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 13:01 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-05-13 13:01 ` do we really want to export more pdflush details in sysctls Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-13 13:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-13 13:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-13 14:30 ` Peter W. Morreale
2009-05-13 14:30 ` Peter W. Morreale
2009-05-15 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-15 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090513130128.GA10382@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pmorreale@novell.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.