All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
To: Brian Austin - Standard Universal <brian@standarduniversal.com.au>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anyone achieved BSD natd(8) compatibility with Linux netfilter or  	Solaris ipf - ie. single-address-on-same-interface bidirectional mapping to 	DMZ private subnet ?
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:07:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905182007.52087.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0FC74A.4080503@standarduniversal.com.au>

Thanks for the response. 

I finally figured out how to do this on Solaris :

  $  echo 'map hme0 192.168.2.0/24 -> 0/32' 

does the job for primary interface hme0 , configured by DHCP,
with static logical interface hme0:1 configured as 192.168.2.1
and dhcpsvc.conf containing "INTERFACES=hme0:1' and 
dhcptab set up to serve the 192.168.2/24 network, setting
the default-router option to 192.168.2.1 , and with 
   "ifconfig hme0 dhcp
    ifconfig hme0 addif 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 
192.168.2.255 up arp
    ifconfig hme0 router
    ifconfig hme0:1 router
    svcadm enable svc:/network/dhcp-server
    svcadm enable svc:network/ipfilter
  '
somewhere in startup scripts .

The Solaris box is my only non-laptop box so problem solved (for me) -
but I'd still like to know:

Please, could anyone answer :
 o is there / what is the equivalent netfilter rule for Linux ?
 o why do the firestarter rules  require two physical ethernet
    interfaces in order to enable "internet connection sharing" ?
 o Is it possible to do internet connection sharing with NAT on Linux
   with only one physical etjhernet interface ? 
  All the documentation I can find assumes two interfaces.
  I want to know how to be able to create  a similar configuration
 on Linux, ie:
  - single primary physical ethernet interface (eth0) configured with 
DHCP
  - a "private" ip also configured on eth0:
   $ ip addr add dev eth0 192.168.2.1/24 ...
  - DHCP set up to serve 192.168.2/24 net ( I can do this OK !)
  - create NAT rules to replace source address of packets with
   dest addr not on subnet 192.168.2/24 with DHCP address
   of eth0, maintainence of state for such packets, and mapping
   the destination address of packets received from non-192.168.2/24
   network to the 192.168.2/24 address of the originating host for
   the 'ESTABLISHED' packet session. 
   Is this possible with a single ethernet interface on Linux or not? 
   
Thanks & Regards,
Jason


On Sunday May 17 2009 04:14:02 Brian Austin - Standard Universal 
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems very simple, google for source nat, destination nat and
> masquerade
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/internet-connection-sharing-
masquerading-on-linux
>
> portforwarding is also rather simple.
>
> regards
>
> Brian
>
> Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > This is my first post to this list, so please excuse me if I miss
> > something or if this is an inappropriate posting for this list.
> >
> > Question :
> >
> > I am trying to replace an ancient MacOSX box, whose natd(8) does a
> > really great job of
> > "Connection Sharing" - becoming a router for the "External Internet"
> > to my local LAN
> > subnet whose addresses it has provided with DHCP ( 192.168.2.2 - 4 
) .
> >
> > So natd(8) maps the IP source address in packets originating from the
> > local 192.168.2.{2,3.4} subnet
> > that appear from the en0 interface, to the external internet address
> > given to the single interface en0 by
> > my DSL modem , and sends such packets out on en0 with the 
destination
> > address and port mapped back
> > to natd's address and port on the external internet .   natd(8)
> > maintains a table of all such packets sent
> > out to the external internet, such that when a response for such a
> > packet it received, the destination
> > IP address is mapped back to the original packet originator, and is
> > then sent back out on en0 to the
> > local DMZ subnet host that originated it,  as in this diagram :
> >
> >    MacOS Host:
> >    single IP interface  en0:
> >         ipv4 address 192.168.2.1
> >         ipv4 address 66.68.31.192 (assigned from DSL router)
> >    natd:
> >         listens on      66.68.31.192:natd
> >   bootpd:
> >         listens on      192.168.2.1:bootps
> >
> >     DMZ   hosts:  192.168.2.2, 192.168.2.3,   192.168.2.4
> >
> >   All these hosts are connected to the same hub, whose uplink cable is
> > connected to the DSL Router.
> >
> >   natd(8) reads a raw socket to receive every packet that is received
> > on interface  en0.
> >   When a packet is received from a 192.168.2.x source address  with 
a
> > destination address
> >    that is not  in subnet 192.168.2/24 , it replaces the 192.168.2/24
> > address with 66.68.31.192,
> >    and the destination address and port with 66.68.31.192:natd , and
> > sends the packet back out on en0;
> >    the DSL router sends such packets on to the external internet, and
> > the external internet host sends
> >    responses back to 66.68.31.192:natd;  natd can then use  the 
packet
> >  identifiers it generated
> >   for the request packets to the response packet (it could  even use a
> > separate port to receive
> >   response packets  for each separate DMZ  host, so the mapping
> > becomes trivial).
> >
> > My  question is : how can this be achieved with Linux netfilter or
> > Solaris IP Filter / ipnat(4) ?
> > I have either a Solaris host or Linux host I can use for this job. The
> > old MacOSX ppc32 host is
> > too slow, and does not support more than two other hosts on the 
DMZ .
> >
> > What I don't understand from the netfilter / ipfilter documentation 
is
> > precisely how a response
> > from the external internet , whit a destination IP + port on the
> > gateway , is translated into a response
> > for a DMZ host in the same way as netd does.
> >
> > I have looked  at the open-source firestarter project, which can
> > construct NAT rules to do this for a gateway
> >  host with two physical interfaces, but all my hosts have only one
> > physical ethernet interface.
> >
> > Could anyone please explain how response packets can be routed 
back to
> > the DMZ host with Linux netfilter or Solaris ipfilter rules ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Jason.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-19  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-16  0:10 Anyone achieved BSD natd(8) compatibility with Linux netfilter or Solaris ipf - ie. single-address-on-same-interface bidirectional mapping to DMZ private subnet ? Jason Vas Dias
2009-05-17  8:14 ` Brian Austin - Standard Universal
2009-05-19  0:07   ` Jason Vas Dias [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-19  0:09 Jason Vas Dias

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905182007.52087.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
    --to=jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
    --cc=brian@standarduniversal.com.au \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.