From: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
To: Brian Austin - Standard Universal <brian@standarduniversal.com.au>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anyone achieved BSD natd(8) compatibility with Linux netfilter or Solaris ipf - ie. single-address-on-same-interface bidirectional mapping to DMZ private subnet ?
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:09:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905182009.15851.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> (raw)
Thanks for the response.
I finally figured out how to do this on Solaris :
$ echo 'map hme0 192.168.2.0/24 -> 0/32' | ipnat -f -
does the job for primary interface hme0 , configured by DHCP,
with static logical interface hme0:1 configured as 192.168.2.1
and dhcpsvc.conf containing "INTERFACES=hme0:1' and
dhcptab set up to serve the 192.168.2/24 network, setting
the default-router option to 192.168.2.1 , and with
"ifconfig hme0 dhcp
ifconfig hme0 addif 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
192.168.2.255 up arp
ifconfig hme0 router
ifconfig hme0:1 router
svcadm enable svc:/network/dhcp-server
svcadm enable svc:network/ipfilter
'
somewhere in startup scripts .
The Solaris box is my only non-laptop box so problem solved (for me) -
but I'd still like to know:
Please, could anyone answer :
o is there / what is the equivalent netfilter rule for Linux ?
o why do the firestarter rules require two physical ethernet
interfaces in order to enable "internet connection sharing" ?
o Is it possible to do internet connection sharing with NAT on Linux
with only one physical etjhernet interface ?
All the documentation I can find assumes two interfaces.
I want to know how to be able to create a similar configuration
on Linux, ie:
- single primary physical ethernet interface (eth0) configured with
DHCP
- a "private" ip also configured on eth0:
$ ip addr add dev eth0 192.168.2.1/24 ...
- DHCP set up to serve 192.168.2/24 net ( I can do this OK !)
- create NAT rules to replace source address of packets with
dest addr not on subnet 192.168.2/24 with DHCP address
of eth0, maintainence of state for such packets, and mapping
the destination address of packets received from non-192.168.2/24
network to the 192.168.2/24 address of the originating host for
the 'ESTABLISHED' packet session.
Is this possible with a single ethernet interface on Linux or not?
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
On Sunday May 17 2009 04:14:02 Brian Austin - Standard Universal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems very simple, google for source nat, destination nat and
> masquerade
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/internet-connection-sharing-
masquerading-on-linux
>
> portforwarding is also rather simple.
>
> regards
>
> Brian
>
> Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > This is my first post to this list, so please excuse me if I miss
> > something or if this is an inappropriate posting for this list.
> >
> > Question :
> >
> > I am trying to replace an ancient MacOSX box, whose natd(8) does a
> > really great job of
> > "Connection Sharing" - becoming a router for the "External Internet"
> > to my local LAN
> > subnet whose addresses it has provided with DHCP ( 192.168.2.2 - 4
) .
> >
> > So natd(8) maps the IP source address in packets originating from the
> > local 192.168.2.{2,3.4} subnet
> > that appear from the en0 interface, to the external internet address
> > given to the single interface en0 by
> > my DSL modem , and sends such packets out on en0 with the
destination
> > address and port mapped back
> > to natd's address and port on the external internet . natd(8)
> > maintains a table of all such packets sent
> > out to the external internet, such that when a response for such a
> > packet it received, the destination
> > IP address is mapped back to the original packet originator, and is
> > then sent back out on en0 to the
> > local DMZ subnet host that originated it, as in this diagram :
> >
> > MacOS Host:
> > single IP interface en0:
> > ipv4 address 192.168.2.1
> > ipv4 address 66.68.31.192 (assigned from DSL router)
> > natd:
> > listens on 66.68.31.192:natd
> > bootpd:
> > listens on 192.168.2.1:bootps
> >
> > DMZ hosts: 192.168.2.2, 192.168.2.3, 192.168.2.4
> >
> > All these hosts are connected to the same hub, whose uplink cable is
> > connected to the DSL Router.
> >
> > natd(8) reads a raw socket to receive every packet that is received
> > on interface en0.
> > When a packet is received from a 192.168.2.x source address with
a
> > destination address
> > that is not in subnet 192.168.2/24 , it replaces the 192.168.2/24
> > address with 66.68.31.192,
> > and the destination address and port with 66.68.31.192:natd , and
> > sends the packet back out on en0;
> > the DSL router sends such packets on to the external internet, and
> > the external internet host sends
> > responses back to 66.68.31.192:natd; natd can then use the
packet
> > identifiers it generated
> > for the request packets to the response packet (it could even use a
> > separate port to receive
> > response packets for each separate DMZ host, so the mapping
> > becomes trivial).
> >
> > My question is : how can this be achieved with Linux netfilter or
> > Solaris IP Filter / ipnat(4) ?
> > I have either a Solaris host or Linux host I can use for this job. The
> > old MacOSX ppc32 host is
> > too slow, and does not support more than two other hosts on the
DMZ .
> >
> > What I don't understand from the netfilter / ipfilter documentation
is
> > precisely how a response
> > from the external internet , whit a destination IP + port on the
> > gateway , is translated into a response
> > for a DMZ host in the same way as netd does.
> >
> > I have looked at the open-source firestarter project, which can
> > construct NAT rules to do this for a gateway
> > host with two physical interfaces, but all my hosts have only one
> > physical ethernet interface.
> >
> > Could anyone please explain how response packets can be routed
back to
> > the DMZ host with Linux netfilter or Solaris ipfilter rules ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Jason.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
info.html
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 0:09 Jason Vas Dias [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-16 0:10 Anyone achieved BSD natd(8) compatibility with Linux netfilter or Solaris ipf - ie. single-address-on-same-interface bidirectional mapping to DMZ private subnet ? Jason Vas Dias
2009-05-17 8:14 ` Brian Austin - Standard Universal
2009-05-19 0:07 ` Jason Vas Dias
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905182009.15851.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
--to=jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
--cc=brian@standarduniversal.com.au \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.