From: Karsten Keil <keil@b1-systems.de>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] Add XHFC support for embedded Speech-Design board to hfcmulti
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:12:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905201112.22062.keil@b1-systems.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242789181.3147.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Marcel,
Hi Dave,
On Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 05:13:01 Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> > I have been applying some gigaset patches into the net-next-2.6
> > and I would therefore suggest that you push ISDN changes bound
> > for the next kernel release via the networking tree as well.
> >
> > In fact I'm very surprised that you're not at least CC:'ing
> > netdev@vger.kernel.org with these patches. Not only would they get
> > review for networking specific issues they would also get your patches
> > tracked automatically at:
My idea was to not send it on too much lists, but I think you are right,
netdev@vger.kernel.org should be used here and since it should go via the net
tree it should be the default.
> >
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
> >
> > Can you at least state how you intend to manage the ISDN changes you
> > queue up? Are you going to submit them independantly and straight to
> > Linus or are you going to play along and get them in via my
> > net-next-2.6 tree in order to avoid all of the merge hassles?
>
> since mISDN uses AF_ISDN and sockets, I personally would prefer if they
> go via net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 trees. This makes it a lot simpler in
> case of merge conflicts during the merge windows.
>
Yes, you are right, I queued it for linux-next because I was remembering that
somebody did suggest this in the past, but this was not really a good idea.
I will setup a new merge tree based on net-2.6-next (or better net-2.6) ?
Karsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 13:27 [PATCH 00/19] mISDN update for linux-next Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 01/19] Add XHFC support for embedded Speech-Design board to hfcmulti Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 19:11 ` David Miller
2009-05-20 3:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-05-20 9:12 ` Karsten Keil [this message]
2009-05-20 19:38 ` David Miller
2009-05-20 7:56 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 9:19 ` Karsten Keil
2009-05-20 11:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-20 12:18 ` Karsten Keil
2009-05-20 16:59 ` Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 02/19] Fix bug in XHFC registering Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 03/19] Add PCI ID for Junghanns 8S card Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 04/19] Add watchdog functionality to hfcmulti driver Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 06/19] Fix hfcmulti's PCI IRQ bug during init Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 05/19] DSP now uses ring buffer for echo canceler Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 07/19] Echo canceler now gets delay information from hardware Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 09/19] Reduce stack size in dsp_cmx_send() Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 08/19] Fixed missing spin lock on pipeline process Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 10/19] Added layer-1-hold feature Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 11/19] Fix DTMF locking bug issue Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 12/19] Hardware acceleration is now possible in conjunction with audio recording Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 13/19] Fix TEI and SAPI handling Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 14/19] Add "sapi" information to debug messages Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 15/19] Added PCI ID for new Junghanns.net Single E1 cards Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 16/19] Add allocation of recvbuf[1500] at run time to reduce stack size Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 17/19] Fix skb leak in error cases Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 18/19] Cleanup debug messages Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 13:58 ` [PATCH 19/19] isdn: get_free_devid() failure ignored Karsten Keil
2009-05-19 22:22 ` [PATCH 00/19] mISDN update for linux-next Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 1:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905201112.22062.keil@b1-systems.de \
--to=keil@b1-systems.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.