From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH STABLE 2/2] net: Fix -net socket parameter checks
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:38:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090521163850.GD24584@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1580B9.5090907@web.de>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>> My commit ea053add700d8abe203cd79a9ffb082aee4eabc0 broke -net socket by
> >>> overwriting an intermediate buffer in the added check_param. Fix this
> >>> by switching check_param to automatic buffer allocation and release, ie.
> >>> callers no longer have to worry about providing a scratch buffer.
> >> That commit was buggy, too, and is awaiting to be fixed in unstable by
> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/43041.
> >>
> >> But more importantly, it makes no sense in stable because its "heart",
> >> param checking for -net is only in unstable (and that's perfectly fine).
> > My interest was in the previous one, since it fixes a bug reported by a Fedora
> > user. I picked this one, only because it fixes the fix ;-)
> > But I can happily leave it out, if you think it is better.
>
> This patch 2 has never been a fix of patch 1 in your series. I agree
> that 1/2 is worth considering for stable, but that one never required
> any addon fix.
I got the wrong impression from your changelog then.
Thanks for taking a look
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-21 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-21 0:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH STABLE 0/2] Backport -net socket fixes Glauber Costa
2009-05-21 0:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH STABLE 1/2] net: Fix -net socket, listen (Jan Kiszka) Glauber Costa
2009-05-21 0:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH STABLE 2/2] net: Fix -net socket parameter checks Glauber Costa
2009-05-21 6:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-05-21 12:12 ` Glauber Costa
2009-05-21 16:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-05-21 16:38 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-05-21 16:45 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090521163850.GD24584@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.