* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels. [not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/> @ 2009-05-28 7:02 ` Andrew Morton 2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville 2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-05-28 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt Cc: bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:53:46 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317 > > Summary: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels. > Product: Alternate Trees > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.29+ > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: high > Priority: P1 > Component: rt > AssignedTo: alt-trees_rt@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: dandart@googlemail.com > Regression: No > > > Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels? > In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably > to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT > patch. > Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make > them happily coexist? > Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it. Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not work with -rt kernels. Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels. 2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton @ 2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville 2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn 2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2009-05-28 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart, ivdoorn On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not > work with -rt kernels. > > Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this? Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it. Ivo? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels. 2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville @ 2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ivo Van Doorn @ 2009-05-28 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John W. Linville Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-wireless, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:40 AM, John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:02:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not >> work with -rt kernels. >> >> Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this? > > Honestly, I don't recall hearing about it. Ivo? No, I can't recall any -rt specific issues either, and so far no regular open bug is critical enough to make rt2x00 depend on CONFIG_BROKEN. Ivo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels. 2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton 2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville @ 2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-05-28 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-wireless, Steven Rostedt, bugzilla-daemon, bugme-daemon, dandart On Thu, 28 May 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Is there a problem with using rt2x00 kernel modules with realtime kernels? > > In the info page it says that they need the symbol "BROKEN" which is probably > > to tell us that we can't use it. I can't compile it into kernels with an RT > > patch. > > Why? What's wrong with this mix of module and tree? Is there any way to make > > them happily coexist? > > > > Good question, but bugzilla isn't a good place to ask it. > > Presumably there's some bustage in the rt2x00 driver which makes it not > work with -rt kernels. > > Did the -rt guys tell the wireless guys about this? There was some build failure which got fixed in meantime, but I forgot to remove the broken flag. Will do with the next release. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-28 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-13317-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-05-28 7:02 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 13317] New: No rt2x00 modules in RT kernels Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 8:40 ` John W. Linville
2009-05-28 9:03 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2009-05-28 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.