From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, mickflemm@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 00:33:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905300033.12204.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243294366.29222.10.camel@johannes.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 873 bytes --]
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 01:32:46 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > + err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> > + if (err) {
> > + sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Missing rfkill_free, and why -EPERM?
Thanks for this remark. I fixed the code and will post an updated patch soon.
Any other comments on the patch? If not, any chance to get it merged into
wireless-testing branch?
> Could you try to work against v11
> of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to get
current rfkill support into mainline as fast as possible. Improvements and
adaptations to reworked rfkill framework can follow.
Regards,
Toby
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, mickflemm@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 00:33:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905300033.12204.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243294366.29222.10.camel@johannes.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 873 bytes --]
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 01:32:46 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:24 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> > + err = rfkill_register(sc->rf_kill.rfkill);
> > + if (err) {
> > + sc->rf_kill.rfkill = NULL;
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Missing rfkill_free, and why -EPERM?
Thanks for this remark. I fixed the code and will post an updated patch soon.
Any other comments on the patch? If not, any chance to get it merged into
wireless-testing branch?
> Could you try to work against v11
> of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to get
current rfkill support into mainline as fast as possible. Improvements and
adaptations to reworked rfkill framework can follow.
Regards,
Toby
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1242850139-25438-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com>
2009-05-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath5k: led, cleanup and prepare macros Jiri Slaby
2009-05-20 20:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath5k: add support for radio LED Tobias Doerffel
2009-05-20 20:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-05-20 20:29 ` Bob Copeland
2009-05-20 20:33 ` Tobias Doerffel
2009-05-20 20:41 ` [ath5k-devel] " Bob Copeland
2009-05-22 12:35 ` Bob Copeland
2009-05-25 23:24 ` [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support Tobias Doerffel
2009-05-25 23:24 ` Tobias Doerffel
2009-05-25 23:32 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-25 23:32 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-29 22:33 ` Tobias Doerffel [this message]
2009-05-29 22:33 ` Tobias Doerffel
2009-05-29 23:14 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-29 23:14 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-30 15:26 ` [ath5k-devel] " Alan Jenkins
2009-05-30 15:26 ` Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905300033.12204.tobias.doerffel@gmail.com \
--to=tobias.doerffel@gmail.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.