From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:34:28 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906022334.29428.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243930050.9146.53.camel@blaa>
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:37:30 pm Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 23:46 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > This effectively reverts 99ffc696d10b28580fe93441d627cf290ac4484c
> > "virtio: wean net driver off NETDEV_TX_BUSY".
> >
> > The complexity of queuing an skb (setting a tasklet to re-xmit) is
> > questionable,
>
> It certainly adds some subtle complexities to start_xmit()
>
> > especially once we get rid of the other reason for the
> > tasklet in the next patch.
> >
> > If the skb won't fit in the tx queue, just return NETDEV_TX_BUSY. It
> > might be frowned upon, but it's common and not going away any time
> > soon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 49
> > ++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 11
> > insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >
> > @@ -526,27 +517,14 @@ again:
> > /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> > free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> >
> > - /* If we has a buffer left over from last time, send it now. */
> > - if (unlikely(vi->last_xmit_skb) &&
> > - xmit_skb(vi, vi->last_xmit_skb) != 0)
> > - goto stop_queue;
> > + /* Put new one in send queue and do transmit */
> > + __skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
> > + if (likely(xmit_skb(vi, skb) == 0)) {
> > + vi->svq->vq_ops->kick(vi->svq);
> > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > + }
>
> Hmm, is it okay to leave the skb on the send queue if we return
> NETDEV_TX_BUSY?
Certainly not. That's a bug. Incremental fix is:
diff -u b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -524,8 +524,9 @@
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
- /* Ring too full for this packet. */
+ /* Ring too full for this packet, remove it from queue again. */
pr_debug("%s: virtio not prepared to send\n", dev->name);
+ __skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
netif_stop_queue(dev);
/* Activate callback for using skbs: if this returns false it
Thanks!
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-29 14:16 [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 8:07 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 14:04 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-06-02 14:04 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 8:07 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 9:05 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 9:05 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 13:55 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 23:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 23:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-03 3:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-08 5:22 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-08 5:22 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-13 12:30 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-13 12:30 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-14 6:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-14 6:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-18 7:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-18 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 3:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 3:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 4:36 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 4:36 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 13:50 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 13:50 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-19 14:10 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-19 14:10 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22 2:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-22 2:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-22 5:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22 13:41 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22 13:41 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-22 18:25 ` Matt Carlson
2009-06-22 18:25 ` Matt Carlson
2009-06-23 2:54 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-23 2:54 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-22 5:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-06-18 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-18 7:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-03 3:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 13:55 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 14:16 Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906022334.29428.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.