All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: patrick.ohly@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, divy@chelsio.com,
	rolandd@cisco.com, xemul@openvz.org, dcbw@redhat.com,
	libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: skb_orphan on dev_hard_start_xmit
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:38:29 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906022338.30618.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090602.002553.143476036.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:55:53 pm David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:47:22 +0200
>
> > On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 23:44 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> This patch adds skb_orphan to the start of dev_hard_start_xmit(): it
> >> can be premature in the NETDEV_TX_BUSY case, but that's uncommon.
> >
> > Would it be possible to make the new skb_orphan() at the start of
> > dev_hard_start_xmit() conditionally so that it is not executed for
> > packets that are to be time stamped?
> >
> > As discussed before
> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/121378/), the skb->sk
> > socket pointer is required for sending back the send time stamp from
> > inside the device driver. Calling skb_orphan() unconditionally as in
> > this patch would break the hardware time stamping of outgoing packets.
>
> Indeed, we need to check that case, at a minimum.
>
> And there are other potentially other problems.  For example, I
> wonder how this interacts with the new TX MMAP af_packet support
> in net-next-2.6 :-/

I think I'll do this in the driver for now, and let's revisit doing it 
generically later?

Thanks,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 14:14 [PATCH 1/4] net: skb_orphan on dev_hard_start_xmit Rusty Russell
2009-05-29 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-29 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-01 12:27   ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-03 21:02     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-03 21:02     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-04  3:54       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-04  4:00         ` David Miller
2009-06-04  4:00         ` David Miller
2009-06-04  4:54           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-04  4:56             ` David Miller
2009-06-04  9:18               ` [PATCH] net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx Eric Dumazet
2009-06-04  9:26                 ` David Miller
2009-06-10  8:17                 ` David Miller
2009-06-10  8:30                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-06-11  9:56                     ` David Miller
2009-06-04  4:56             ` [PATCH 1/4] net: skb_orphan on dev_hard_start_xmit David Miller
2009-06-04  3:54       ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-01 19:47 ` Patrick Ohly
2009-06-01 19:47 ` Patrick Ohly
2009-06-02  7:25   ` David Miller
2009-06-02  7:25   ` David Miller
2009-06-02 14:08     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-06-03  0:14       ` David Miller
2009-07-03  7:55         ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  3:02           ` David Miller
2009-07-04  3:08             ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  3:08             ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  3:13               ` David Miller
2009-07-04  3:13               ` David Miller
2009-07-04  7:42                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  7:42                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  9:09                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-04  9:09                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-05  3:26                     ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-05  3:34                       ` Herbert Xu
2009-07-05  3:34                       ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-18  1:47                         ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:47                         ` David Miller
2009-08-19  3:19                           ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-19  3:19                           ` Herbert Xu
2009-08-19  3:34                             ` David Miller
2009-08-19  3:34                             ` David Miller
2009-07-03  7:55         ` Herbert Xu
2009-06-02 14:08     ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-29 14:14 Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906022338.30618.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=divy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    --cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.