From: Mattia Dongili <malattia-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Alan Jenkins
<alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:49:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608224915.GA4583@kamineko.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244457418.18863.8.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:31 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > The re-written rfkill core ensures rfkill devices are initialized to
> > the system default state. The core calls set_block after registration
> > so the driver shouldn't need to.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
>
> Good catch, thanks.
Just to confirm, is this patch going to sit in the wireless-testing tree
and you will submit it for inclusion together with the rfkill work
right?
> > ---
> >
> > This patch applies on top of the rfkill rewrite in the wireless-testing tree.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > index aec0b27..c1b21a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > @@ -1114,7 +1114,6 @@ static int sony_nc_setup_rfkill(struct acpi_device *device,
> > return err;
> > }
> > sony_rfkill_devices[nc_type] = rfk;
> > - sony_nc_rfkill_set((void *)nc_type, false);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >
> >
thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:49:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608224915.GA4583@kamineko.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244457418.18863.8.camel@johannes.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1167 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:31 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > The re-written rfkill core ensures rfkill devices are initialized to
> > the system default state. The core calls set_block after registration
> > so the driver shouldn't need to.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>
> Good catch, thanks.
Just to confirm, is this patch going to sit in the wireless-testing tree
and you will submit it for inclusion together with the rfkill work
right?
> > ---
> >
> > This patch applies on top of the rfkill rewrite in the wireless-testing tree.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > index aec0b27..c1b21a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
> > @@ -1114,7 +1114,6 @@ static int sony_nc_setup_rfkill(struct acpi_device *device,
> > return err;
> > }
> > sony_rfkill_devices[nc_type] = rfk;
> > - sony_nc_rfkill_set((void *)nc_type, false);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >
> >
thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 10:31 [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load Alan Jenkins
2009-06-08 10:31 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-08 10:36 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244457418.18863.8.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 22:49 ` Mattia Dongili [this message]
2009-06-08 22:49 ` Mattia Dongili
[not found] ` <20090608224915.GA4583-pM3i+3kAS8Rg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-09 8:31 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-09 8:31 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-09 9:21 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-06-09 9:30 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090608224915.GA4583@kamineko.org \
--to=malattia-k2ghghhvrty@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.