From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffer()
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:20:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609122057.GF3476@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608175452.GA4995@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:54:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 07:27:21PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
> > Sometimes, upon interrupt, fread returns with no data, and
> > the (incoming exec) migration fails.
> >
> > Fix by retrying on such a case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > savevm.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c
> > index 248aea3..df2486d 100644
> > --- a/savevm.c
> > +++ b/savevm.c
> > @@ -215,7 +215,14 @@ static int popen_put_buffer(void *opaque, const uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int s
> > static int popen_get_buffer(void *opaque, uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int size)
> > {
> > QEMUFilePopen *s = opaque;
> > - return fread(buf, 1, size, s->popen_file);
> > + FILE *fp = s->popen_file;
> > + int bytes;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + clearerr(fp);
>
> Would it make sense to only clearerr on EINTR - if we intend to retry?
>
> > + bytes = fread(buf, 1, size, fp);
> > + } while ((bytes == 0) && ferror(fp) && (errno == EINTR));
>
>
> This does nothing about partial reads (bytes != 0)
> I think it's intentional because the user actually retries
> partial reads. Right?
>
> > + return bytes;
> > }
> >
> > static int popen_close(void *opaque)
>
> Looking at qemu_fill_buffer, it seems that it is enough to set
> bytes to -EAGAIN. User will then retry. Correct?
Looking at the code some more, at least qemu_get_byte really seems to
expect a reliable read underneath, so it won't work. Generally the fact
that qemu_get_byte returns 0 on error seems broken to me maybe we could
fix that and then have a single loop retrying reads. But that's for
another patch.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffer() Uri Lublin
2009-06-08 16:55 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-09 10:49 ` Uri Lublin
2009-06-09 14:51 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-08 17:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-09 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-06-09 12:32 ` Uri Lublin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-02 16:49 Uri Lublin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609122057.GF3476@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=uril@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.