From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cl@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mpm@selenic.com,
npiggin@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090610205749.GA9321@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090610205026.GC8147@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > > What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat
> > > suggests it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be
> > > much to conflict, except kmemcheck - which has more or less
> > > trivial callbacks there.
> >
> > The conflicting bits are the patches that remove bootmem
> > allocator uses in arch/x86 and kernel/sched.c.
>
> Give me an hour and i'll get some minimal testing done.
This tree doesnt conflict (not even with kmecheck) - and the older
bits you sent against the scheduler and against x86 doesnt apply
anymore - but they do look scary.
How about this: i can send the scheduler and x86 bits to Linus right
now, that should make it possible to have a clean base for you and
no interactions with anything pending?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-10 20:12 [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31 Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-10 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 20:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-10 20:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 0:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 21:00 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-10 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:17 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 11:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 11:49 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 13:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 14:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 14:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 15:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 17:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-11 18:10 ` [GIT PULL v3] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-11 21:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 22:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-12 8:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 7:25 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-12 7:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 7:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-12 7:33 ` Li Zefan
2009-06-12 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-11 23:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-12 8:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:00 ` [GIT PULL] " Ingo Molnar
2009-06-10 20:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 21:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-10 21:11 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090610205749.GA9321@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.