All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Discard Changes
       [not found] ` <mailman.1.1244516401.12212.users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-11  6:34   ` Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle
  2009-06-12  4:05     ` Ryusuke Konishi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle @ 2009-06-11  6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg

Hi!

I found the item "checkpoint rollback" in the todo-list. By "checkpoint
rollback" you mean discarding all changes since a given checkpoint?

Such a feature would be *very* nice! I can't imagine that it should be very
complicated to implement, but I might be wrong.

In SIMPLUX (a live distribution) users shall have a chance to abolisch
all changes made in a session. So I would create a snapshot at each startup and
remove all checkpoints created afterwards to revert to the previous state if
user decides to do so.

Greetings, Michael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Discard Changes
  2009-06-11  6:34   ` Discard Changes Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle
@ 2009-06-12  4:05     ` Ryusuke Konishi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryusuke Konishi @ 2009-06-12  4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg, mniederle-RbZlAiThDcE

Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:13 +0200, "Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle" wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I found the item "checkpoint rollback" in the todo-list. By "checkpoint
> rollback" you mean discarding all changes since a given checkpoint?

Yes, exactly.
 
> Such a feature would be *very* nice! I can't imagine that it should be very
> complicated to implement, but I might be wrong.
> 
> In SIMPLUX (a live distribution) users shall have a chance to abolisch
> all changes made in a session. So I would create a snapshot at each startup and
> remove all checkpoints created afterwards to revert to the previous state if
> user decides to do so.
> 
> Greetings, Michael

I imagine it is likely be compilcated in NILFS because a few metadata
files have no past versions in the current implementation.

Nilfs can change checkpoints to snapshots in later.  So, I think the
rollback feature should inherit this characteristics.  That is,
rollback without a prior make-snapshot operation.

Cheers,
Ryusuke Konsihi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-12  4:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <mailman.1.1244516401.12212.users@nilfs.org>
     [not found] ` <mailman.1.1244516401.12212.users-JrjvKiOkagjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-11  6:34   ` Discard Changes Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle
2009-06-12  4:05     ` Ryusuke Konishi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.