From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jay Vosburg <fubar@us.ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Subjec: bonding: remove bonding read/write semaphore
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:02:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090613050421.699009135@vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090613050243.100086546@vyatta.com
[-- Attachment #1: bond-sema.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4631 bytes --]
The whole read/write semaphore locking can be removed. It doesn't add any
protection that isn't already done by using the RTNL mutex properly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2009-06-12 07:27:12.459766764 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2009-06-12 07:27:19.557928468 -0700
@@ -3489,10 +3489,10 @@ static int bond_event_changename(struct
{
bond_remove_proc_entry(bond);
bond_create_proc_entry(bond);
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
bond_destroy_sysfs_entry(bond);
bond_create_sysfs_entry(bond);
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -4015,7 +4015,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_devi
return -EPERM;
}
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
slave_dev = dev_get_by_name(&init_net, ifr->ifr_slave);
pr_debug("slave_dev=%p: \n", slave_dev);
@@ -4048,7 +4047,6 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_devi
dev_put(slave_dev);
}
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
return res;
}
@@ -5123,8 +5121,6 @@ int bond_create(const char *name)
int res;
rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
-
/* Check to see if the bond already exists. */
if (name) {
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list)
@@ -5173,24 +5169,20 @@ int bond_create(const char *name)
goto out_bond;
}
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
- rtnl_unlock(); /* allows sysfs registration of net device */
res = bond_create_sysfs_entry(netdev_priv(bond_dev));
if (res < 0)
goto out_unreg;
+ rtnl_unlock();
return 0;
out_unreg:
- rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
unregister_netdevice(bond_dev);
out_bond:
bond_deinit(bond_dev);
out_netdev:
free_netdev(bond_dev);
out_rtnl:
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
rtnl_unlock();
return res;
}
@@ -5209,8 +5201,6 @@ static int __init bonding_init(void)
bond_create_proc_dir();
- init_rwsem(&bonding_rwsem);
-
for (i = 0; i < max_bonds; i++) {
res = bond_create(NULL);
if (res)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c 2009-06-12 07:25:18.155802980 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c 2009-06-12 07:27:19.558928513 -0700
@@ -44,20 +44,6 @@
/*---------------------------- Declarations -------------------------------*/
static int expected_refcount = -1;
-/*--------------------------- Data Structures -----------------------------*/
-
-/* Bonding sysfs lock. Why can't we just use the subsystem lock?
- * Because kobject_register tries to acquire the subsystem lock. If
- * we already hold the lock (which we would if the user was creating
- * a new bond through the sysfs interface), we deadlock.
- * This lock is only needed when deleting a bond - we need to make sure
- * that we don't collide with an ongoing ioctl.
- */
-
-struct rw_semaphore bonding_rwsem;
-
-
-
/*------------------------------ Functions --------------------------------*/
@@ -70,7 +56,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(struct
int res = 0;
struct bonding *bond;
- down_read(&(bonding_rwsem));
+ rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list) {
if (res > (PAGE_SIZE - IFNAMSIZ)) {
@@ -84,7 +70,8 @@ static ssize_t bonding_show_bonds(struct
}
if (res)
buf[res-1] = '\n'; /* eat the leftover space */
- up_read(&(bonding_rwsem));
+
+ rtnl_unlock();
return res;
}
@@ -122,7 +109,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_bonds(struc
if (command[0] == '-') {
rtnl_lock();
- down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
list_for_each_entry(bond, &bond_dev_list, bond_list)
if (strnicmp(bond->dev->name, ifname, IFNAMSIZ) == 0) {
@@ -157,7 +143,6 @@ err_no_cmd:
return -EPERM;
out_unlock:
- up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
rtnl_unlock();
/* Always return either count or an error. If you return 0, you'll
@@ -253,7 +238,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_slaves(stru
if (!rtnl_trylock())
return restart_syscall();
- down_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
sscanf(buffer, "%16s", command); /* IFNAMSIZ*/
ifname = command + 1;
@@ -357,7 +341,6 @@ err_no_cmd:
ret = -EPERM;
out:
- up_write(&(bonding_rwsem));
rtnl_unlock();
return ret;
}
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h 2009-06-12 07:25:18.145850134 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h 2009-06-12 07:27:19.560013885 -0700
@@ -351,9 +351,6 @@ extern const struct bond_parm_tbl arp_va
extern const struct bond_parm_tbl fail_over_mac_tbl[];
extern struct bond_parm_tbl ad_select_tbl[];
-/* exported from bond_sysfs.c */
-extern struct rw_semaphore bonding_rwsem;
-
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
void bond_send_unsolicited_na(struct bonding *bond);
void bond_register_ipv6_notifier(void);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-13 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-13 5:02 [PATCH 0/9] Bonding patches for 2.6.31 Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] bonding: bond_create always called with default parameters Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] bonding: initialize before registration Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] bonding: fix destructor Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] bonding: fix style issues Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] bonding: elminate bad refcount code Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] bonding: network device names are case sensative Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] bonding: use is_zero_ether_addr Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] bonding: initialization rework Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-14 6:37 ` [PATCH 0/9] Bonding patches for 2.6.31 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090613050421.699009135@vyatta.com \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.