From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC PATCH: ext4 no journal corruption with locale-gen
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:46:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617234604.GF7867@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6601abe90906171148w1431258fvd0afa105cda9b77b@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Curt,
Thanks for your analysis of the bug. The reason for the strange logic
in ext4_set_aops() is because at the moment the code doesn't support
the combination of data=journalled && delalloc. That's why it was
explicitly checking for ext4_should_order_data() and
ext4_should_writeback_data().
We have a check for this in ext4_fill_super(), so your patch should be
safe, since the combination of ext4_should_journal_data &&
test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC) should never happen.
As to your question of whether the nodelalloc and nojournal case
should really be ext4_journalled_aops, I suspect ext4_writeback_aops
makes more sense. I haven't audited all of the code paths to make
sure they DTRT in the non-journalled case yet, though.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 18:48 RFC PATCH: ext4 no journal corruption with locale-gen Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-06-17 23:46 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-06-22 16:42 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-06-22 16:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-06-22 17:01 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-06-22 21:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-07-01 18:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-01 18:44 ` Michael Rubin
2009-07-02 23:27 ` Xiang Wang
2009-06-29 17:50 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2009-07-01 18:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-06 3:41 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-06 15:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-07-13 13:05 ` Theodore Tso
2009-07-06 16:21 ` Xiang Wang
2009-07-09 18:30 ` Xiang Wang
2009-07-10 7:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617234604.GF7867@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.