From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] kvm/mmu: rename is_largepage_backed to mapping_level
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:59:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623155933.GA3651@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245417389-5527-4-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Hi Joerg,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> With the new name and the corresponding backend changes this function
> can now support multiple hugepage sizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 1f24d88..3fa6009 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -390,37 +390,52 @@ static void mmu_free_rmap_desc(struct kvm_rmap_desc *rd)
> * Return the pointer to the largepage write count for a given
> * gfn, handling slots that are not large page aligned.
> */
> -static int *slot_largepage_idx(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +static int *slot_largepage_idx(gfn_t gfn,
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> + int level)
> {
> unsigned long idx;
>
> - idx = (gfn / KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL)) -
> - (slot->base_gfn / KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL));
> - return &slot->lpage_info[0][idx].write_count;
> + idx = (gfn / KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level)) -
> + (slot->base_gfn / KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level));
> + return &slot->lpage_info[level - 2][idx].write_count;
> }
>
> static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> int *write_count;
> + int i;
>
> gfn = unalias_gfn(kvm, gfn);
> - write_count = slot_largepage_idx(gfn,
> - gfn_to_memslot_unaliased(kvm, gfn));
> - *write_count += 1;
> +
> + for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL;
> + i < PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> + slot = gfn_to_memslot_unaliased(kvm, gfn);
Can't you move this call out of the loop?
> + write_count = slot_largepage_idx(gfn, slot, i);
> + *write_count += 1;
> + }
> }
>
> static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> int *write_count;
> + int i;
>
> gfn = unalias_gfn(kvm, gfn);
> - write_count = slot_largepage_idx(gfn,
> - gfn_to_memslot_unaliased(kvm, gfn));
> - *write_count -= 1;
> - WARN_ON(*write_count < 0);
> + for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL;
> + i < PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> + slot = gfn_to_memslot_unaliased(kvm, gfn);
> + write_count = slot_largepage_idx(gfn, slot, i);
> + *write_count -= 1;
> + WARN_ON(*write_count < 0);
> + }
> }
>
> -static int has_wrprotected_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +static int has_wrprotected_page(struct kvm *kvm,
> + gfn_t gfn,
> + int level)
> {
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> int *largepage_idx;
> @@ -428,47 +443,67 @@ static int has_wrprotected_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> gfn = unalias_gfn(kvm, gfn);
> slot = gfn_to_memslot_unaliased(kvm, gfn);
> if (slot) {
> - largepage_idx = slot_largepage_idx(gfn, slot);
> + largepage_idx = slot_largepage_idx(gfn, slot, level);
> return *largepage_idx;
> }
>
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static int host_largepage_backed(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +static int host_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> + unsigned long page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> unsigned long addr;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int i, ret = 0;
>
> addr = gfn_to_hva(kvm, gfn);
> if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> - return ret;
> + return page_size;
>
> down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> vma = find_vma(current->mm, addr);
> - if (vma && is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
> - ret = 1;
> + if (!vma)
> + goto out;
> +
> + page_size = vma_kernel_pagesize(vma);
> +
> +out:
> up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>
> + for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
> + i < (PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES); ++i) {
> + if (page_size >= KVM_HPAGE_SIZE(i))
> + ret = i;
> + else
> + break;
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int is_largepage_backed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t large_gfn)
> +static int mapping_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t large_gfn)
> {
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> -
> - if (has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, large_gfn))
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (!host_largepage_backed(vcpu->kvm, large_gfn))
> - return 0;
> + int host_level;
> + int level = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
>
> slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, large_gfn);
> if (slot && slot->dirty_bitmap)
> - return 0;
> + return PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
>
> - return 1;
> + host_level = host_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, large_gfn);
> +
> + if (host_level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> + return host_level;
> +
> + for (level = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; level <= host_level; ++level) {
> +
> + if (has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, large_gfn, level))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return level - 1;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1704,7 +1739,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> if ((pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
> || (write_fault && !is_write_protection(vcpu) && !user_fault)) {
>
> - if (largepage && has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn)) {
> + if (largepage && has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, 1)) {
It seems direct_map is missing the large pte overwrite check that
fetch() contains:
if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
rmap_remove(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
__set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
}
(perhaps its not a possible scenario at the moment, but...).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 13:16 [PATCH 0/8 v3] KVM support for 1GB pages Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 1/8] hugetlbfs: export vma_kernel_pagsize to modules Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] kvm: change memslot data structures for multiple hugepage sizes Joerg Roedel
2009-06-23 16:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] kvm/mmu: rename is_largepage_backed to mapping_level Joerg Roedel
2009-06-23 15:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-06-23 17:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/8] kvm/mmu: make rmap code aware of mapping levels Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] kvm/mmu: make direct mapping paths " Joerg Roedel
2009-06-23 16:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-23 17:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] kvm/mmu: add support for another level to page walker Joerg Roedel
2009-06-20 11:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 9:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] kvm/mmu: enable gbpages by increasing nr of pagesizes Joerg Roedel
2009-06-19 13:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] kvm x86: report 1GB page support to userspace Joerg Roedel
2009-06-20 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/8 v3] KVM support for 1GB pages Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 9:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-22 9:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 9:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-06-22 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-24 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-29 13:17 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090623155933.GA3651@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.