From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RDAC path checker status change messages
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:01:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090624210150.GH3172@ether.msp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906241615210.22601@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:19:00PM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>
>> We do not want to print these messages as they will be flooding
>> your /var/log/messages even when everything is good.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> We want to print these messages only to get User's attention.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> If your concern is that the last message is "down", then we should be
>> having a static variable and print up or ghost message only once (when
>> we toggle from down to up/ghost).
>
> You do have a static variable, so that messages are only printed when the
> status changes. However, because of the missing MSG() calls when the status
> is PATH_UP and PATH_GHOST, then the string printed is "path down", when it
> should be "path up" or "path ghost".
>
> I believe that the patch is good. The MSG() calls will change the message
> string, and then the higher layer will notice the status change, and print
> the message.
>
> Please check the code and correct me if I am wrong.
You are correct. Looks fine by me.
I'll add this for RHEL 5.5. It will make it into Centos after that.
-Ben
>
>>
>> chandra
>> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:50 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
>>> It seems to me that this patch is required, to fix a problem with "path
>>> down" messages being logged when the path transitions to up (and
>>> presumably ghost).
>>>
>>> --- libcheckers/rdac.c.orig 2009-06-23 15:38:05.371422000 -0400
>>> +++ libcheckers/rdac.c 2009-06-23 15:39:28.020843000 -0400
>>> @@ -105,5 +105,12 @@
>>> return PATH_DOWN;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - return ((inq.avtcvp & 0x1) ? PATH_UP : PATH_GHOST);
>>> + if (inq.avtcvp & 0x1) {
>>> + MSG(c, MSG_RDAC_UP);
>>> + return PATH_UP;
>>> + }
>>> + else {
>>> + MSG(c, MSG_RDAC_GHOST);
>>> + return PATH_GHOST;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> dm-devel mailing list
>>> dm-devel@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>>
>> --
>> dm-devel mailing list
>> dm-devel@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 19:50 RDAC path checker status change messages Charlie Brady
2009-06-24 18:15 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-06-24 20:19 ` Charlie Brady
2009-06-24 21:01 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2009-06-25 16:57 ` Charlie Brady
2009-06-25 17:02 ` Charlie Brady
2009-06-25 17:28 ` Charlie Brady
2009-06-26 16:07 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2009-06-25 18:29 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-06-25 18:40 ` Charlie Brady
2010-11-03 21:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-11-03 22:16 ` Christophe Varoqui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090624210150.GH3172@ether.msp.redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.