2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

[NOTES:
 * I hope you notice the jump of the number of reported regressions after 2.6.30
   was released.
 * Please let me know which of these bugs have been fixed already (ideally
   please also provide the name of the fix commit).
 * The post-2.6.30 reports were flooded by the megre window noise that made
   them very difficult to track.]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte-v18Uk5sXZWJeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (15 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668
Subject		: Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.
Submitter	: Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 18:08 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
Subject		: Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?
Submitter	: Michael Tokarev <mjt-XAri/EZa3C4vJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-15 14:41 (14 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647
Subject		: fb/mmap lockdep report.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] failed to acquire vblank counter
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (2 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (4 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (4 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (4 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
Subject		: lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)
Submitter	: Jan &quot;Yenya&quot; Kasprzak <kas-0hYGf3jDe+XrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-24 09:35 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85-whZMOeQn8C0@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
Subject		: au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q
Submitter	: Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne-1vnkWVZi4QaVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-13 19:34 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (17 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (17 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (19 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc-M3ycANVxPotyL3EAZA59ERCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan-caicS1wCkhO6A22drWdTBw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (30 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (32 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel-zqRNUXuvxA0b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (41 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (42 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (57 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (60 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (49 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi-3HqRAUrWAWyGglJvpFV4uA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (69 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (76 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (34 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

[NOTES:
 * I hope you notice the jump of the number of reported regressions after 2.6.30
   was released.
 * Please let me know which of these bugs have been fixed already (ideally
   please also provide the name of the fix commit).
 * The post-2.6.30 reports were flooded by the megre window noise that made
   them very difficult to track.]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (15 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668
Subject		: Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.
Submitter	: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Date		: 2009-06-27 18:08 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
Subject		: Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?
Submitter	: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-15 14:41 (14 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647
Subject		: fb/mmap lockdep report.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date		: 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] failed to acquire vblank counter
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (2 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list@phuk.ath.cx>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (4 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (4 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (4 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
Subject		: lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)
Submitter	: Jan &quot;Yenya&quot; Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-24 09:35 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
Subject		: au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q
Submitter	: Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne@ccs.neu.edu>
Date		: 2009-06-13 19:34 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (17 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (17 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (19 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (30 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (32 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (41 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (42 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (57 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (60 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (49 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (69 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (76 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (34 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13109] High latency on /sys/class/thermal

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>

[Bug #13179] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi-3HqRAUrWAWyGglJvpFV4uA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (69 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4

[Bug #13179] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (69 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4

[Bug #13119] Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (76 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13119] Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (76 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

[Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (59 days old)

[Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (59 days old)

[Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (46 days old)

[Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (46 days old)

[Bug #13277] 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (49 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13277] 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (49 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

[Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (60 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (60 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

[Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Larry Finger]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>

The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.

A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
be corrected if I missed it.

Larry

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Larry Finger]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>

The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.

A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
be corrected if I missed it.

Larry

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
> 
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.

Thanks for the update.

Hmm, isn't it suboptimal to use a slab allocator for allocations taking up an
entire page?  That's the case on some architectures and seems to be the root
cause of the issue at hand.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> 
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
> 
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.

Thanks for the update.

Hmm, isn't it suboptimal to use a slab allocator for allocations taking up an
entire page?  That's the case on some architectures and seems to be the root
cause of the issue at hand.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
> 
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.
> 

I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where 
oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular 
page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and 
the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of 
its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> 
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
> 
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.
> 

I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where 
oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular 
page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and 
the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of 
its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Larry Finger]

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> 
>>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>>> Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>>> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>>> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>>> Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
> 
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where 
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular 
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and 
> the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of 
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
undiagnosed. It seems better to me to debug when you can, but turn off
debugging in cases like this.

Larry

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Larry Finger]

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> 
>>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>>> Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>>> Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>>> Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>>> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>>> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>>> Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
> 
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where 
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular 
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and 
> the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of 
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
undiagnosed. It seems better to me to debug when you can, but turn off
debugging in cases like this.

Larry

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:

> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where 
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular 
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and 
> > the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of 
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
> 
> If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
> SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
> undiagnosed.

You're buying debugging support at the cost of increased memory 
consumption when you enable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON and that's causing the 
page allocation failures because of fragmentation.  To reduce the minimum 
order required for caches such as kmalloc-4096, you'd have to disable 
debugging for that particular cache.  It's my opinion that such a 
configuration should not be the default, however.

You could argue adding `slub_debug=-,kmalloc-4096' support from the 
command line, but CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should not change its well-defined 
purpose of enabling debugging on all slab caches.  Otherwise the rest of 
us would be forced to add `slub_debug=,kmalloc-4096' for consistent 
behavior with older kernels.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> > Subject             : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> > Submitter   : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date                : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> >               http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>> > Handled-By  : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
>
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
causes problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported
debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
might be going back to that.

So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
welcome!

                              Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> > Subject             : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> > Submitter   : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> > Date                : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> >               http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>> > Handled-By  : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
>>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
>
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.

Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
causes problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported
debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
might be going back to that.

So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
welcome!

                              Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2316 bytes --]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> > the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
> 
> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
> causes problems in the real world.

I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in 
the real world.

The option has a clear and well-defined purpose and that is to enable 
debugging on all slab caches.  If you modify its definition, users will 
generally ignore the warning about debugging being disabled when "the 
minimum possible order at which slab may be allocated is higher than 
without."  And unless they check the kernel log for such a warning to boot 
with `slab_debug=,kmalloc-4096', we lose testing coverage because we 
cannot enable redzoning or tracing after boot.

> Furthermore, SLUB never supported
> debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
> passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
> might be going back to that.
> 

Even when page allocation is fast enough, it would still be helpful to 
configure slub to not do passthrough purely for the lightweight debugging 
opportunities.

> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
> welcome!
> 

You're referring to `slub_debug=A'?  I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should 
continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it 
causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because 
oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with 
debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added 
slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.

We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would 
opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as 
opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully 
enabled.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2269 bytes --]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> > the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
> 
> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
> causes problems in the real world.

I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in 
the real world.

The option has a clear and well-defined purpose and that is to enable 
debugging on all slab caches.  If you modify its definition, users will 
generally ignore the warning about debugging being disabled when "the 
minimum possible order at which slab may be allocated is higher than 
without."  And unless they check the kernel log for such a warning to boot 
with `slab_debug=,kmalloc-4096', we lose testing coverage because we 
cannot enable redzoning or tracing after boot.

> Furthermore, SLUB never supported
> debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
> passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
> might be going back to that.
> 

Even when page allocation is fast enough, it would still be helpful to 
configure slub to not do passthrough purely for the lightweight debugging 
opportunities.

> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
> welcome!
> 

You're referring to `slub_debug=A'?  I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should 
continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it 
causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because 
oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with 
debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added 
slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.

We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would 
opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as 
opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully 
enabled.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
>> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
>> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
>> > the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
>> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>>
>> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
>> causes problems in the real world.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> the real world.

It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!

I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
do when you are a tester looking for bugs.

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
>> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
>> welcome!

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> You're referring to `slub_debug=A'?  I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should
> continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it
> causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because
> oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with
> debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added
> slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.
>
> We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would
> opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as
> opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully
> enabled.

Yup, I was referring to slub_debug=A and no, I don't agree with you
that it should be on by default. Only people who know what they're
doing should enable the option and a random tester by definition
doesn't (no offence to Mr. Random Tester).

                                                   Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
>> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it.  This particular
>> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
>> > the system has 4K pages.  Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
>> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>>
>> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
>> causes problems in the real world.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> the real world.

It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!

I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
do when you are a tester looking for bugs.

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
>> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
>> welcome!

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> You're referring to `slub_debug=A'?  I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should
> continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it
> causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because
> oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with
> debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added
> slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.
>
> We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would
> opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as
> opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully
> enabled.

Yup, I was referring to slub_debug=A and no, I don't agree with you
that it should be on by default. Only people who know what they're
doing should enable the option and a random tester by definition
doesn't (no offence to Mr. Random Tester).

                                                   Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Larry Finger]

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> Yup, I was referring to slub_debug=A and no, I don't agree with you
> that it should be on by default. Only people who know what they're
> doing should enable the option and a random tester by definition
> doesn't (no offence to Mr. Random Tester).

None taken.

For me, the next step is clear. As I'm much more interested in finding
bugs in the wireless system than in the mechanics of SLUB allocation,
I need to disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON. BTW, I use SLAB on Linus's
mainline tree and SLUB on the wireless testing tree. I build and boot
the mainline kernels mostly to look for quick failures/regressions,
but run the w-t kernels looking for longer-term effects such as memory
fragmentation or slow memory leaks.

For Rafael's benefit, we do need to decide if this is a bug or merely
an unintended side effect. My sense is the latter and Bug #13319
should have a summary of this discussion added to the record, and then
the bug should be closed.

Larry

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> > the real world.
> 
> It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
> already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
> options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
> defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!
> 

I feel that asking a user to add a command line parameter such as 
`slub_debug=A' in addition to CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON will likely lead to 
less testing coverage and bugs going unreported.  CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is 
not something that a distro is going to enable or would be used in a 
production environment, it's something that's used to debug slub and/or 
slab allocations either during the development of new kernel code or when 
an underlying problem is realized.

> I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
> say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
> allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
> do when you are a tester looking for bugs.
> 

Quite the contrary, I agree completely with the above, and that's why I'm 
arguing for full debugging to be enabled when a well-defined configuration 
option is enabled.  I simply don't believe that such debugging should be 
coupled with a command line option to be fully activated for all caches.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> > I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> > the real world.
> 
> It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
> already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
> options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
> defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!
> 

I feel that asking a user to add a command line parameter such as 
`slub_debug=A' in addition to CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON will likely lead to 
less testing coverage and bugs going unreported.  CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is 
not something that a distro is going to enable or would be used in a 
production environment, it's something that's used to debug slub and/or 
slab allocations either during the development of new kernel code or when 
an underlying problem is realized.

> I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
> say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
> allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
> do when you are a tester looking for bugs.
> 

Quite the contrary, I agree completely with the above, and that's why I'm 
arguing for full debugging to be enabled when a well-defined configuration 
option is enabled.  I simply don't believe that such debugging should be 
coupled with a command line option to be fully activated for all caches.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging causes
> problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported debugging
> for objects that big historically because of page allocator passthrough.
> And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we might be going
> back to that.

SLUB for some period of time had passthrough. It did not start out like
that though.

kmalloc-4096 causes problems in the long run and so do other caches that
are of similar size. But it allows debugging to occur. Silently switching
it off is something I am not comfortable with.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging causes
> problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported debugging
> for objects that big historically because of page allocator passthrough.
> And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we might be going
> back to that.

SLUB for some period of time had passthrough. It did not start out like
that though.

kmalloc-4096 causes problems in the long run and so do other caches that
are of similar size. But it allows debugging to occur. Silently switching
it off is something I am not comfortable with.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:32 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> kmalloc-4096 causes problems in the long run and so do other caches that
> are of similar size. But it allows debugging to occur. Silently switching
> it off is something I am not comfortable with.

I suggested adding a

  printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
                    "enable it blah blah blah\n");

Does that work for you?

			Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

>   printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
>                     "enable it blah blah blah\n");
>
> Does that work for you?

Its definitely better.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

>   printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
>                     "enable it blah blah blah\n");
>
> Does that work for you?

Its definitely better.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> >   printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
> >                     "enable it blah blah blah\n");
> >
> > Does that work for you?
> 
> Its definitely better.
> 

I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches 
like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of 
slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging 
metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it.  In other words, if we 
use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
(3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
+ */
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
+		int min_order;
+
+		/*
+		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
+		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
+		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
+		 */
+		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
+		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
+			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
+			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
+	}
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> >   printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
> >                     "enable it blah blah blah\n");
> >
> > Does that work for you?
> 
> Its definitely better.
> 

I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches 
like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of 
slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging 
metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it.  In other words, if we 
use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
(3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
+ */
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
+		int min_order;
+
+		/*
+		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
+		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
+		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
+		 */
+		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
+		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
+			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
+			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
+	}
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches
> like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of
> slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging
> metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it.  In other words, if we
> use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
> (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:

I like it.

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
>  				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
>
>  /*
> + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> + */
> +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> +
> +/*
>   * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
>   */
>  #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
>  		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
>  		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
>
> +	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> +		int min_order;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> +		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> +		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> +		 */
> +		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> +		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
> +			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> +			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);

It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
the size with all metadata

if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches
> like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of
> slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging
> metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it.  In other words, if we
> use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
> (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:

I like it.

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
>  				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
>
>  /*
> + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> + */
> +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> +
> +/*
>   * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
>   */
>  #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
>  		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
>  		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
>
> +	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> +		int min_order;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> +		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> +		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> +		 */
> +		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> +		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
> +			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> +			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);

It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
the size with all metadata

if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
> >  				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> >
> >  /*
> > + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> > + */
> > +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> > +
> > +/*
> >   * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
> >   */
> >  #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> > @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> >  		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> >  		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
> >
> > +	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> > +		int min_order;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> > +		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> > +		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> > +		 */
> > +		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> > +		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> > +			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
> > +			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> > +			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
> 
> It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
> the size with all metadata
> 
> if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)
> 

Ah, right.  Then we could simply eliminate the check on s->flags to begin 
with.

This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all 
debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I 
think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full 
debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
> >  				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> >
> >  /*
> > + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> > + */
> > +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> > +
> > +/*
> >   * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
> >   */
> >  #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> > @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> >  		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> >  		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
> >
> > +	if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> > +		int min_order;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> > +		 * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> > +		 * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> > +		 */
> > +		min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> > +		if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> > +			printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order "
> > +			       "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> > +			       s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
> 
> It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
> the size with all metadata
> 
> if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)
> 

Ah, right.  Then we could simply eliminate the check on s->flags to begin 
with.

This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all 
debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I 
think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full 
debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all
> debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I
> think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full
> debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
size slabs


slab_debug=p

or so

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all
> debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I
> think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full
> debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
size slabs


slab_debug=p

or so

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
> size slabs
> 
> 
> slab_debug=p
> 
> or so
> 

I definitely like that more than slab_debug=A, where we're requiring an 
added parameter for full debugging to be activated.

I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on 
specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata, 
though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache, 
which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with 
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.

I think the solution to this is really based on good software engineering 
and test practices, though, so hopefully there'll be a consensus on which 
direction to take before any time is spent in implementing and pushing it.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
> size slabs
> 
> 
> slab_debug=p
> 
> or so
> 

I definitely like that more than slab_debug=A, where we're requiring an 
added parameter for full debugging to be activated.

I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on 
specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata, 
though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache, 
which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with 
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.

I think the solution to this is really based on good software engineering 
and test practices, though, so hopefully there'll be a consensus on which 
direction to take before any time is spent in implementing and pushing it.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on
> specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata,
> though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache,
> which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.

One of the reasons for disabling debugging is to speed up the kernel. Race
conditions may vanish due to the additional latency added by the debugging
code. Ideally you know which slab cache has the race and you only would
enable it on that one.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on
> specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata,
> though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache,
> which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.

One of the reasons for disabling debugging is to speed up the kernel. Race
conditions may vanish due to the additional latency added by the debugging
code. Ideally you know which slab cache has the race and you only would
enable it on that one.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:52 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> I think the solution to this is really based on good software engineering
> and test practices, though, so hopefully there'll be a consensus on which
> direction to take before any time is spent in implementing and pushing it.

Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)

So can you send a patch, please?

                        Pekka

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
> 
> So can you send a patch, please?
> 

Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug 
will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of 
disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
> 
> So can you send a patch, please?
> 

Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug 
will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of 
disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
>> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
>> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
>> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
>>
>> So can you send a patch, please?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug
> will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of
> disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

We're at -rc2 so yes, I do think we should fix 2.6.31.

Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
>> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
>> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
>> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
>>
>> So can you send a patch, please?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug
> will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of
> disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.

We're at -rc2 so yes, I do think we should fix 2.6.31.

[patch] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

When debugging is enabled, slub requires that additional metadata be
stored in slabs for certain options: SLAB_RED_ZONE, SLAB_POISON, and
SLAB_STORE_USER.

Consequently, it may require that the minimum possible slab order needed
to allocate a single object be greater when using these options.  The
most notable example is for objects that are PAGE_SIZE bytes in size.

Higher minimum slab orders may cause page allocation failures when oom or
under heavy fragmentation.

This patch adds a new slub_debug option, which disables debugging by
default for caches that would have resulted in higher minimum orders:

	slub_debug=O

When this option is used on systems with 4K pages, kmalloc-4096, for
example, will not have debugging enabled by default even if
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is defined because it would have resulted in a
order-1 minimum slab order.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
 Documentation/vm/slub.txt |   10 ++++++++++
 mm/slub.c                 |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
--- a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Possible debug options are
 	P		Poisoning (object and padding)
 	U		User tracking (free and alloc)
 	T		Trace (please only use on single slabs)
+	O		Switch debugging off for caches that would have
+			caused higher minimum slab orders
 	-		Switch all debugging off (useful if the kernel is
 			configured with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON)
 
@@ -59,6 +61,14 @@ to the dentry cache with
 
 	slub_debug=F,dentry
 
+Debugging options may require the minimum possible slab order to increase as
+a result of storing the metadata (for example, caches with PAGE_SIZE object
+sizes).  This has a higher liklihood of resulting in slab allocation errors
+in low memory situations or if there's high fragmentation of memory.  To
+switch off debugging for such caches by default, use
+
+	slub_debug=O
+
 In case you forgot to enable debugging on the kernel command line: It is
 possible to enable debugging manually when the kernel is up. Look at the
 contents of:
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
+ * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
+ */
+#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
+#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -326,6 +333,7 @@ static int slub_debug;
 #endif
 
 static char *slub_debug_slabs;
+static int disable_higher_order_debug;
 
 /*
  * Object debugging
@@ -977,6 +985,15 @@ static int __init setup_slub_debug(char *str)
 		 */
 		goto check_slabs;
 
+	if (tolower(*str) == 'o') {
+		/*
+		 * Avoid enabling debugging on caches if its minimum order
+		 * would increase as a result.
+		 */
+		disable_higher_order_debug = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	slub_debug = 0;
 	if (*str == '-')
 		/*
@@ -1023,13 +1040,28 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize,
 	unsigned long flags, const char *name,
 	void (*ctor)(void *))
 {
+	int debug_flags = slub_debug;
+
 	/*
 	 * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline.
 	 */
-	if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs ||
-	    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)) == 0))
-			flags |= slub_debug;
+	if (debug_flags) {
+		if (slub_debug_slabs &&
+		    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))
+			goto out;
+
+		/*
+		 * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum
+		 * slab order would have increased as a result.
+		 */
+		if (disable_higher_order_debug &&
+		    get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize))
+			debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS;
+			goto out;
 
+		flags |= debug_flags;
+	}
+out:
 	return flags;
 }
 #else
@@ -1561,6 +1593,10 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (oo_order(s->min) > get_order(s->objsize))
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order, use "
+		       "slub_debug=O to disable.\n", s->name);
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

[patch] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

When debugging is enabled, slub requires that additional metadata be
stored in slabs for certain options: SLAB_RED_ZONE, SLAB_POISON, and
SLAB_STORE_USER.

Consequently, it may require that the minimum possible slab order needed
to allocate a single object be greater when using these options.  The
most notable example is for objects that are PAGE_SIZE bytes in size.

Higher minimum slab orders may cause page allocation failures when oom or
under heavy fragmentation.

This patch adds a new slub_debug option, which disables debugging by
default for caches that would have resulted in higher minimum orders:

	slub_debug=O

When this option is used on systems with 4K pages, kmalloc-4096, for
example, will not have debugging enabled by default even if
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is defined because it would have resulted in a
order-1 minimum slab order.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 Documentation/vm/slub.txt |   10 ++++++++++
 mm/slub.c                 |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
--- a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Possible debug options are
 	P		Poisoning (object and padding)
 	U		User tracking (free and alloc)
 	T		Trace (please only use on single slabs)
+	O		Switch debugging off for caches that would have
+			caused higher minimum slab orders
 	-		Switch all debugging off (useful if the kernel is
 			configured with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON)
 
@@ -59,6 +61,14 @@ to the dentry cache with
 
 	slub_debug=F,dentry
 
+Debugging options may require the minimum possible slab order to increase as
+a result of storing the metadata (for example, caches with PAGE_SIZE object
+sizes).  This has a higher liklihood of resulting in slab allocation errors
+in low memory situations or if there's high fragmentation of memory.  To
+switch off debugging for such caches by default, use
+
+	slub_debug=O
+
 In case you forgot to enable debugging on the kernel command line: It is
 possible to enable debugging manually when the kernel is up. Look at the
 contents of:
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
+ * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
+ */
+#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
+#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -326,6 +333,7 @@ static int slub_debug;
 #endif
 
 static char *slub_debug_slabs;
+static int disable_higher_order_debug;
 
 /*
  * Object debugging
@@ -977,6 +985,15 @@ static int __init setup_slub_debug(char *str)
 		 */
 		goto check_slabs;
 
+	if (tolower(*str) == 'o') {
+		/*
+		 * Avoid enabling debugging on caches if its minimum order
+		 * would increase as a result.
+		 */
+		disable_higher_order_debug = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	slub_debug = 0;
 	if (*str == '-')
 		/*
@@ -1023,13 +1040,28 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize,
 	unsigned long flags, const char *name,
 	void (*ctor)(void *))
 {
+	int debug_flags = slub_debug;
+
 	/*
 	 * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline.
 	 */
-	if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs ||
-	    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)) == 0))
-			flags |= slub_debug;
+	if (debug_flags) {
+		if (slub_debug_slabs &&
+		    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))
+			goto out;
+
+		/*
+		 * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum
+		 * slab order would have increased as a result.
+		 */
+		if (disable_higher_order_debug &&
+		    get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize))
+			debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS;
+			goto out;
 
+		flags |= debug_flags;
+	}
+out:
 	return flags;
 }
 #else
@@ -1561,6 +1593,10 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (oo_order(s->min) > get_order(s->objsize))
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order, use "
+		       "slub_debug=O to disable.\n", s->name);
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

[patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

When debugging is enabled, slub requires that additional metadata be
stored in slabs for certain options: SLAB_RED_ZONE, SLAB_POISON, and
SLAB_STORE_USER.

Consequently, it may require that the minimum possible slab order needed
to allocate a single object be greater when using these options.  The
most notable example is for objects that are PAGE_SIZE bytes in size.

Higher minimum slab orders may cause page allocation failures when oom or
under heavy fragmentation.

This patch adds a new slub_debug option, which disables debugging by
default for caches that would have resulted in higher minimum orders:

	slub_debug=O

When this option is used on systems with 4K pages, kmalloc-4096, for
example, will not have debugging enabled by default even if
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is defined because it would have resulted in a
order-1 minimum slab order.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---

 V1 -> V2: Removed spurious `goto out'.

 Documentation/vm/slub.txt |   10 ++++++++++
 mm/slub.c                 |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
--- a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Possible debug options are
 	P		Poisoning (object and padding)
 	U		User tracking (free and alloc)
 	T		Trace (please only use on single slabs)
+	O		Switch debugging off for caches that would have
+			caused higher minimum slab orders
 	-		Switch all debugging off (useful if the kernel is
 			configured with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON)
 
@@ -59,6 +61,14 @@ to the dentry cache with
 
 	slub_debug=F,dentry
 
+Debugging options may require the minimum possible slab order to increase as
+a result of storing the metadata (for example, caches with PAGE_SIZE object
+sizes).  This has a higher liklihood of resulting in slab allocation errors
+in low memory situations or if there's high fragmentation of memory.  To
+switch off debugging for such caches by default, use
+
+	slub_debug=O
+
 In case you forgot to enable debugging on the kernel command line: It is
 possible to enable debugging manually when the kernel is up. Look at the
 contents of:
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
+ * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
+ */
+#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
+#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -326,6 +333,7 @@ static int slub_debug;
 #endif
 
 static char *slub_debug_slabs;
+static int disable_higher_order_debug;
 
 /*
  * Object debugging
@@ -977,6 +985,15 @@ static int __init setup_slub_debug(char *str)
 		 */
 		goto check_slabs;
 
+	if (tolower(*str) == 'o') {
+		/*
+		 * Avoid enabling debugging on caches if its minimum order
+		 * would increase as a result.
+		 */
+		disable_higher_order_debug = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	slub_debug = 0;
 	if (*str == '-')
 		/*
@@ -1023,13 +1040,27 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize,
 	unsigned long flags, const char *name,
 	void (*ctor)(void *))
 {
+	int debug_flags = slub_debug;
+
 	/*
 	 * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline.
 	 */
-	if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs ||
-	    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)) == 0))
-			flags |= slub_debug;
+	if (debug_flags) {
+		if (slub_debug_slabs &&
+		    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))
+			goto out;
+
+		/*
+		 * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum
+		 * slab order would have increased as a result.
+		 */
+		if (disable_higher_order_debug &&
+		    get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize))
+			debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS;
 
+		flags |= debug_flags;
+	}
+out:
 	return flags;
 }
 #else
@@ -1561,6 +1592,10 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (oo_order(s->min) > get_order(s->objsize))
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order, use "
+		       "slub_debug=O to disable.\n", s->name);
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

[patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

When debugging is enabled, slub requires that additional metadata be
stored in slabs for certain options: SLAB_RED_ZONE, SLAB_POISON, and
SLAB_STORE_USER.

Consequently, it may require that the minimum possible slab order needed
to allocate a single object be greater when using these options.  The
most notable example is for objects that are PAGE_SIZE bytes in size.

Higher minimum slab orders may cause page allocation failures when oom or
under heavy fragmentation.

This patch adds a new slub_debug option, which disables debugging by
default for caches that would have resulted in higher minimum orders:

	slub_debug=O

When this option is used on systems with 4K pages, kmalloc-4096, for
example, will not have debugging enabled by default even if
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is defined because it would have resulted in a
order-1 minimum slab order.

Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---

 V1 -> V2: Removed spurious `goto out'.

 Documentation/vm/slub.txt |   10 ++++++++++
 mm/slub.c                 |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
--- a/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/slub.txt
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ Possible debug options are
 	P		Poisoning (object and padding)
 	U		User tracking (free and alloc)
 	T		Trace (please only use on single slabs)
+	O		Switch debugging off for caches that would have
+			caused higher minimum slab orders
 	-		Switch all debugging off (useful if the kernel is
 			configured with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON)
 
@@ -59,6 +61,14 @@ to the dentry cache with
 
 	slub_debug=F,dentry
 
+Debugging options may require the minimum possible slab order to increase as
+a result of storing the metadata (for example, caches with PAGE_SIZE object
+sizes).  This has a higher liklihood of resulting in slab allocation errors
+in low memory situations or if there's high fragmentation of memory.  To
+switch off debugging for such caches by default, use
+
+	slub_debug=O
+
 In case you forgot to enable debugging on the kernel command line: It is
 possible to enable debugging manually when the kernel is up. Look at the
 contents of:
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@
 				SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
 
 /*
+ * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
+ * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
+ */
+#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
+#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
  * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
  */
 #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -326,6 +333,7 @@ static int slub_debug;
 #endif
 
 static char *slub_debug_slabs;
+static int disable_higher_order_debug;
 
 /*
  * Object debugging
@@ -977,6 +985,15 @@ static int __init setup_slub_debug(char *str)
 		 */
 		goto check_slabs;
 
+	if (tolower(*str) == 'o') {
+		/*
+		 * Avoid enabling debugging on caches if its minimum order
+		 * would increase as a result.
+		 */
+		disable_higher_order_debug = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	slub_debug = 0;
 	if (*str == '-')
 		/*
@@ -1023,13 +1040,27 @@ static unsigned long kmem_cache_flags(unsigned long objsize,
 	unsigned long flags, const char *name,
 	void (*ctor)(void *))
 {
+	int debug_flags = slub_debug;
+
 	/*
 	 * Enable debugging if selected on the kernel commandline.
 	 */
-	if (slub_debug && (!slub_debug_slabs ||
-	    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)) == 0))
-			flags |= slub_debug;
+	if (debug_flags) {
+		if (slub_debug_slabs &&
+		    strncmp(slub_debug_slabs, name, strlen(slub_debug_slabs)))
+			goto out;
+
+		/*
+		 * Disable debugging that increases slab size if the minimum
+		 * slab order would have increased as a result.
+		 */
+		if (disable_higher_order_debug &&
+		    get_order(objsize + DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(objsize))
+			debug_flags &= ~DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS;
 
+		flags |= debug_flags;
+	}
+out:
 	return flags;
 }
 #else
@@ -1561,6 +1592,10 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 		"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
 		s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
 
+	if (oo_order(s->min) > get_order(s->objsize))
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "  %s debugging increased min order, use "
+		       "slub_debug=O to disable.\n", s->name);
+
 	for_each_online_node(node) {
 		struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
 		unsigned long nr_slabs;

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> + */
> +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))

There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size

If the order of both is different then the order would increase.

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> + */
> +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))

There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size

If the order of both is different then the order would increase.

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> > + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> > + */
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> 
> There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
> object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size
> 
> If the order of both is different then the order would increase.
> 

Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have 
increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by 
default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by 
the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has 
the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.

So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is 
created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to 
calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from 
kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.

I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity, 
DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if 
the minimum order increases.

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> > + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> > + */
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> 
> There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
> object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size
> 
> If the order of both is different then the order would increase.
> 

Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have 
increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by 
default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by 
the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has 
the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.

So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is 
created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to 
calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from 
kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.

I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity, 
DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if 
the minimum order increases.

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> > > + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> > > + */
> > > +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> > > +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> > 
> > There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
> > object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size
> > 
> > If the order of both is different then the order would increase.

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:26 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have 
> increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by 
> default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by 
> the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has 
> the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.
> 
> So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is 
> created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to 
> calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from 
> kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.
> 
> I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity, 
> DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if 
> the minimum order increases.

Yup, agreed. I applied the patch, thanks everyone!

			Pekka

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Pekka Enberg]

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> > > + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> > > + */
> > > +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> > > +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> > 
> > There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
> > object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size
> > 
> > If the order of both is different then the order would increase.

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:26 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have 
> increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by 
> default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by 
> the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has 
> the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.
> 
> So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is 
> created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to 
> calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from 
> kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.
> 
> I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity, 
> DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if 
> the minimum order increases.

Yup, agreed. I applied the patch, thanks everyone!

			Pekka

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:26 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have
> > increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by
> > default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by
> > the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has
> > the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.
> >
> > So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is
> > created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to
> > calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from
> > kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.
> >
> > I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity,
> > DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if
> > the minimum order increases.
>
> Yup, agreed. I applied the patch, thanks everyone!

There is a simpler solution. Call calculate sizes again if the resulting
sizes increased the order. Something like this.

Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c    2009-07-10 13:45:02.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2009-07-10 13:46:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -2454,6 +2454,10 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_c
        if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
                goto error;

+       if (get_order(s->size) != get_order(s->objsize) && flag is set) {
+               switch off debug flags.
+               calculate_sizes(s, -1);
+       }
        /*
         * The larger the object size is, the more pages we want on the
partial
         * list to avoid pounding the page allocator excessively.

Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging slabs

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:26 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have
> > increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by
> > default if slub_debug=O is specified.  calculate_sizes() is used by
> > the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has
> > the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.
> >
> > So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is
> > created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to
> > calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from
> > kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.
> >
> > I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity,
> > DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if
> > the minimum order increases.
>
> Yup, agreed. I applied the patch, thanks everyone!

There is a simpler solution. Call calculate sizes again if the resulting
sizes increased the order. Something like this.

Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c    2009-07-10 13:45:02.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2009-07-10 13:46:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -2454,6 +2454,10 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_c
        if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
                goto error;

+       if (get_order(s->size) != get_order(s->objsize) && flag is set) {
+               switch off debug flags.
+               calculate_sizes(s, -1);
+       }
        /*
         * The larger the object size is, the more pages we want on the
partial
         * list to avoid pounding the page allocator excessively.

[Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (41 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (41 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

[Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (57 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4

[Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi-YoqI/XImC7s@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (42 days old)

[Bug #13337] [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (42 days old)

[Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13351] 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

[Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel-zqRNUXuvxA0b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389

[Bug #13374] reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).

 There is no 2.6.30.1 to see if it has been fixed and i have not tested
2.6.31-rc1 (too early for me) so i think it should be still listed

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).

 There is no 2.6.30.1 to see if it has been fixed and i have not tested
2.6.31-rc1 (too early for me) so i think it should be still listed

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (38 days old)
> 
> 

[Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4

[Bug #13373] fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4

[Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (32 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (32 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

[Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (30 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146

[Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (30 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146

[Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 

Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
timer mutex dependency.

Mathieu

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
> Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
> Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
> References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
> Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 

Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
timer mutex dependency.

Mathieu

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
> Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
> Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
> References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
> Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Pallipadi, Venkatesh]

On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> 
> Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
> We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
> timer mutex dependency.
> 

Yes. Still working on it. I thought I had a fix for this. But, over the
weekend test run resulted in a WARN_ON with sysfs_remove_group as below.
Looks like I need a day or two more to work through the web of locks
here..

Thanks,
Venki

[10412.466195] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[10412.466201] WARNING:
at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c:138
sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3()
[10412.466204] Hardware name: Santa Rosa platform
[10412.466206] sysfs group c16df3b0 not found for kobject 'cpufreq'
[10412.466207] Modules linked in:
[10412.466210] Pid: 20609, comm: write_syscpufre Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1
#195
[10412.466212] Call Trace:
[10412.466217]  [<c102a0a4>] warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x90
[10412.466220]  [<c102a108>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
[10412.466223]  [<c10e0422>] sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3
[10412.466227]  [<c131b7fc>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1f7/0x25b
[10412.466231]  [<c1319469>] __cpufreq_governor+0x7c/0xb3
[10412.466234]  [<c1319608>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x13f/0x1c3
[10412.466238]  [<c1319e74>] store_scaling_governor+0x18a/0x1b2
[10412.466241]  [<c131aa50>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x28
[10412.466244]  [<c131a2a5>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x33/0x5b
[10412.466247]  [<c1319cea>] ? store_scaling_governor+0x0/0x1b2
[10412.466250]  [<c131a942>] store+0x48/0x61
[10412.466254]  [<c10de532>] sysfs_write_file+0xb4/0xdf
[10412.466265]  [<c10de47e>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xdf
[10412.466269]  [<c10a0172>] vfs_write+0x84/0xdf
[10412.466272]  [<c10a0266>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
[10412.466276]  [<c1002a04>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
[10412.466278] ---[ end trace 31a730d96cbc1841 ]---

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Pallipadi, Venkatesh]

On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> 
> Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
> We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
> timer mutex dependency.
> 

Yes. Still working on it. I thought I had a fix for this. But, over the
weekend test run resulted in a WARN_ON with sysfs_remove_group as below.
Looks like I need a day or two more to work through the web of locks
here..

Thanks,
Venki

[10412.466195] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[10412.466201] WARNING:
at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c:138
sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3()
[10412.466204] Hardware name: Santa Rosa platform
[10412.466206] sysfs group c16df3b0 not found for kobject 'cpufreq'
[10412.466207] Modules linked in:
[10412.466210] Pid: 20609, comm: write_syscpufre Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1
#195
[10412.466212] Call Trace:
[10412.466217]  [<c102a0a4>] warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x90
[10412.466220]  [<c102a108>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
[10412.466223]  [<c10e0422>] sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3
[10412.466227]  [<c131b7fc>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1f7/0x25b
[10412.466231]  [<c1319469>] __cpufreq_governor+0x7c/0xb3
[10412.466234]  [<c1319608>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x13f/0x1c3
[10412.466238]  [<c1319e74>] store_scaling_governor+0x18a/0x1b2
[10412.466241]  [<c131aa50>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x28
[10412.466244]  [<c131a2a5>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x33/0x5b
[10412.466247]  [<c1319cea>] ? store_scaling_governor+0x0/0x1b2
[10412.466250]  [<c131a942>] store+0x48/0x61
[10412.466254]  [<c10de532>] sysfs_write_file+0xb4/0xdf
[10412.466265]  [<c10de47e>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xdf
[10412.466269]  [<c10a0172>] vfs_write+0x84/0xdf
[10412.466272]  [<c10a0266>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
[10412.466276]  [<c1002a04>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
[10412.466278] ---[ end trace 31a730d96cbc1841 ]---

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Pallipadi, Venkatesh (venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > 
> > 
> > Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
> > We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
> > timer mutex dependency.
> > 
> 
> Yes. Still working on it. I thought I had a fix for this. But, over the
> weekend test run resulted in a WARN_ON with sysfs_remove_group as below.
> Looks like I need a day or two more to work through the web of locks
> here..
> 

A quick fix I thought about is to add a mutex to cpufreq.c.

This mutex would be taken outside of the rwlock write lock each time
this lock is taken in cpufreq.c.

This mutex would also be taken from the ondemand and conservator module
sysfs operations.

We remove the dbs_mutexes, given they would now be replaced by this
new cpufreq.c mutex.

Note that the GOV_STOP call should be done while this new mutex is held,
but the rwlock is _not_ held.

I did not implement it because cpufreq.c:cpufreq_add_dev() first needs a
big cleanup for the error handling paths. They are currently completely
bogus and I don't want to add a lock into code that is not currently
correct.

If you find time to do this cleanup and lock implementation, I'll be
glad to review it and provide advice.

Thanks,

Mathieu


> Thanks,
> Venki
> 
> [10412.466195] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [10412.466201] WARNING:
> at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c:138
> sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3()
> [10412.466204] Hardware name: Santa Rosa platform
> [10412.466206] sysfs group c16df3b0 not found for kobject 'cpufreq'
> [10412.466207] Modules linked in:
> [10412.466210] Pid: 20609, comm: write_syscpufre Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1
> #195
> [10412.466212] Call Trace:
> [10412.466217]  [<c102a0a4>] warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x90
> [10412.466220]  [<c102a108>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> [10412.466223]  [<c10e0422>] sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3
> [10412.466227]  [<c131b7fc>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1f7/0x25b
> [10412.466231]  [<c1319469>] __cpufreq_governor+0x7c/0xb3
> [10412.466234]  [<c1319608>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x13f/0x1c3
> [10412.466238]  [<c1319e74>] store_scaling_governor+0x18a/0x1b2
> [10412.466241]  [<c131aa50>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x28
> [10412.466244]  [<c131a2a5>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x33/0x5b
> [10412.466247]  [<c1319cea>] ? store_scaling_governor+0x0/0x1b2
> [10412.466250]  [<c131a942>] store+0x48/0x61
> [10412.466254]  [<c10de532>] sysfs_write_file+0xb4/0xdf
> [10412.466265]  [<c10de47e>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xdf
> [10412.466269]  [<c10a0172>] vfs_write+0x84/0xdf
> [10412.466272]  [<c10a0266>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> [10412.466276]  [<c1002a04>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
> [10412.466278] ---[ end trace 31a730d96cbc1841 ]---
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Pallipadi, Venkatesh (venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com) wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > 
> > 
> > Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
> > We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
> > timer mutex dependency.
> > 
> 
> Yes. Still working on it. I thought I had a fix for this. But, over the
> weekend test run resulted in a WARN_ON with sysfs_remove_group as below.
> Looks like I need a day or two more to work through the web of locks
> here..
> 

A quick fix I thought about is to add a mutex to cpufreq.c.

This mutex would be taken outside of the rwlock write lock each time
this lock is taken in cpufreq.c.

This mutex would also be taken from the ondemand and conservator module
sysfs operations.

We remove the dbs_mutexes, given they would now be replaced by this
new cpufreq.c mutex.

Note that the GOV_STOP call should be done while this new mutex is held,
but the rwlock is _not_ held.

I did not implement it because cpufreq.c:cpufreq_add_dev() first needs a
big cleanup for the error handling paths. They are currently completely
bogus and I don't want to add a lock into code that is not currently
correct.

If you find time to do this cleanup and lock implementation, I'll be
glad to review it and provide advice.

Thanks,

Mathieu


> Thanks,
> Venki
> 
> [10412.466195] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [10412.466201] WARNING:
> at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c:138
> sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3()
> [10412.466204] Hardware name: Santa Rosa platform
> [10412.466206] sysfs group c16df3b0 not found for kobject 'cpufreq'
> [10412.466207] Modules linked in:
> [10412.466210] Pid: 20609, comm: write_syscpufre Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1
> #195
> [10412.466212] Call Trace:
> [10412.466217]  [<c102a0a4>] warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x90
> [10412.466220]  [<c102a108>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> [10412.466223]  [<c10e0422>] sysfs_remove_group+0x3e/0xa3
> [10412.466227]  [<c131b7fc>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1f7/0x25b
> [10412.466231]  [<c1319469>] __cpufreq_governor+0x7c/0xb3
> [10412.466234]  [<c1319608>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x13f/0x1c3
> [10412.466238]  [<c1319e74>] store_scaling_governor+0x18a/0x1b2
> [10412.466241]  [<c131aa50>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x28
> [10412.466244]  [<c131a2a5>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x33/0x5b
> [10412.466247]  [<c1319cea>] ? store_scaling_governor+0x0/0x1b2
> [10412.466250]  [<c131a942>] store+0x48/0x61
> [10412.466254]  [<c10de532>] sysfs_write_file+0xb4/0xdf
> [10412.466265]  [<c10de47e>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xdf
> [10412.466269]  [<c10a0172>] vfs_write+0x84/0xdf
> [10412.466272]  [<c10a0266>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> [10412.466276]  [<c1002a04>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
> [10412.466278] ---[ end trace 31a730d96cbc1841 ]---
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

[Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (32 days old)

[Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (32 days old)

[Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (34 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672

[Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (34 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672

[Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan-caicS1wCkhO6A22drWdTBw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4

[Bug #13471] Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4

[Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc-M3ycANVxPotyL3EAZA59ERCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13472] Oops with minicom and USB serial

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (24 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

[Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (19 days old)

[Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (19 days old)

[Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)

[Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)

Re: [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Daniel Smolik]

Rafael J. affected napsal(a):
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
> Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
> Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)
>
>
>   
Yes problem still exists. I now bitsecting and I am near to find 
affected patch.

Regards
       Dan

Re: [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Daniel Smolik]

Rafael J. affected napsal(a):
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
> Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
> Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
> Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)
>
>
>   
Yes problem still exists. I now bitsecting and I am near to find 
affected patch.

Regards
       Dan

Re: [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Daniel Smolik wrote:
> Rafael J. affected napsal(a):
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
> > Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
> > Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)
> >
> >
> >   
> Yes problem still exists. I now bitsecting and I am near to find 
> affected patch.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Daniel Smolik wrote:
> Rafael J. affected napsal(a):
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
> > Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
> > Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
> > Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (18 days old)
> >
> >
> >   
> Yes problem still exists. I now bitsecting and I am near to find 
> affected patch.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael

[Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/

[Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/

[Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)

[Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)

Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Jos van Wolput]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
> Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
> Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)
>
>
>
>   
Yes, it still should be listed, KMS doesn't work, at least on my system.

Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Jos van Wolput]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
> Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
> Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
> Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)
>
>
>
>   
Yes, it still should be listed, KMS doesn't work, at least on my system.

Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Jos van Wolput wrote:
> 
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
> > Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
> > Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput-kN7GrHn7egj0B9fh5IxImPP6llvjuJOh@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> Yes, it still should be listed, KMS doesn't work, at least on my system.

Thanks for the update, but I'm afraid we won't have enough information to
debug this issue.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13554] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 29 June 2009, Jos van Wolput wrote:
> 
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
> > Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
> > Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
> > Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (12 days old)
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> Yes, it still should be listed, KMS doesn't work, at least on my system.

Thanks for the update, but I'm afraid we won't have enough information to
debug this issue.

Best,
Rafael

[Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (17 days old)

[Bug #13518] slab grows with NFS write activity.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (17 days old)

[Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (17 days old)

[Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (17 days old)

[Bug #13528] au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
Subject		: au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q
Submitter	: Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne-1vnkWVZi4QaVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-13 19:34 (16 days old)

[Bug #13528] au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
Subject		: au0828: major drop in reception quality between 2.6.29.4 and 2.6.30 on HVR-950q
Submitter	: Jim Faulkner <jfaulkne@ccs.neu.edu>
Date		: 2009-06-13 19:34 (16 days old)

[Bug #13613] lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
Subject		: lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)
Submitter	: Jan &quot;Yenya&quot; Kasprzak <kas-0hYGf3jDe+XrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-24 09:35 (5 days old)

[Bug #13613] lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
Subject		: lockups with JFS (inconsistent lock state)
Submitter	: Jan &quot;Yenya&quot; Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-24 09:35 (5 days old)

[Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (4 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>

[Bug #13620] acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (4 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>

[Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (4 days old)

[Bug #13621] xfs hangs with assertion failed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (4 days old)

[Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85-whZMOeQn8C0@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (10 days old)

[Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (10 days old)

[Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (12 days old)

[Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (12 days old)

[Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Re: [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Johannes Stezenbach]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1083 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:31:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
> Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
> Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
> Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

I tested v2.6.31-rc1-228-g2bfdd79 and the bug is still there.
It actually got worse, the local_irq_save/restore workaround
in kernel/up-c (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/333) doesn't fix it
anymore, it hangs at suspend before writing out the image.

With the up.c workaround (including a
WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled() && !oops_in_progress);)
applied and no_console_suspend I captured the attached
output using a crappy webcam.  (Without the workaround
there is a huge spew of warnings about irqs enabled
unexpectedly.)  I guess the interesting part is

  pm_op(): pci_pm_thaw returns -16
  PM: Device 0000:00:00.0 failed to thaw: error -16

(PCI info is in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630)


Johannes

[-- Attachment #2: suspend-crash.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 31083 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:31:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
> > Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
> > Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js-FF7aIK3TAVNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
> > Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I tested v2.6.31-rc1-228-g2bfdd79 and the bug is still there.
> It actually got worse, the local_irq_save/restore workaround
> in kernel/up-c (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/333) doesn't fix it
> anymore, it hangs at suspend before writing out the image.
> 
> With the up.c workaround (including a
> WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled() && !oops_in_progress);)
> applied and no_console_suspend I captured the attached
> output using a crappy webcam.  (Without the workaround
> there is a huge spew of warnings about irqs enabled
> unexpectedly.)  I guess the interesting part is
> 
>   pm_op(): pci_pm_thaw returns -16
>   PM: Device 0000:00:00.0 failed to thaw: error -16

Hmm, it looks like we fail to thaw the host bridge.

> (PCI info is in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630)

Well, thanks for the update.  I'll do my best to fix the cpufreq suspend
before 2.6.31 final.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13644] hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:31:01AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
> > Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
> > Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> > Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (13 days old)
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
> > Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> 
> I tested v2.6.31-rc1-228-g2bfdd79 and the bug is still there.
> It actually got worse, the local_irq_save/restore workaround
> in kernel/up-c (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/333) doesn't fix it
> anymore, it hangs at suspend before writing out the image.
> 
> With the up.c workaround (including a
> WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled() && !oops_in_progress);)
> applied and no_console_suspend I captured the attached
> output using a crappy webcam.  (Without the workaround
> there is a huge spew of warnings about irqs enabled
> unexpectedly.)  I guess the interesting part is
> 
>   pm_op(): pci_pm_thaw returns -16
>   PM: Device 0000:00:00.0 failed to thaw: error -16

Hmm, it looks like we fail to thaw the host bridge.

> (PCI info is in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630)

Well, thanks for the update.  I'll do my best to fix the cpufreq suspend
before 2.6.31 final.

Best,
Rafael

[Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (4 days old)

[Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list@phuk.ath.cx>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (4 days old)

[Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187

[Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187

[Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (2 days old)

[Bug #13634] [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (2 days old)

[Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13649] Bad page state in process with various applications

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

[Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647
Subject		: fb/mmap lockdep report.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122

[Bug #13647] fb/mmap lockdep report.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647
Subject		: fb/mmap lockdep report.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date		: 2009-06-21 13:33 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122

[Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309

[Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309

Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
> Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
> Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
> Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309
> 

I'd be interested to hear from Justin if reducing 
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio as I earlier suggested helps.  

ZONE_NORMAL isn't much larger than ZONE_DMA32 on this machine and both 
lowmem zones have an abundance of free memory which suggests pdflush's 
ratio isn't being met to commence background writeout while at the same 
time ZONE_NORMAL is being depleted as the result of constant nfs 
GFP_ATOMIC allocations that cannot try direct reclaim.

Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[Justin Piszcz]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
>> Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
>> Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
>> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309
>>
>
> I'd be interested to hear from Justin if reducing
> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio as I earlier suggested helps.
>
> ZONE_NORMAL isn't much larger than ZONE_DMA32 on this machine and both
> lowmem zones have an abundance of free memory which suggests pdflush's
> ratio isn't being met to commence background writeout while at the same
> time ZONE_NORMAL is being depleted as the result of constant nfs
> GFP_ATOMIC allocations that cannot try direct reclaim.
>

Hello,

http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/30960/

"It's funny, though, that the problem that originally started this thread 
was quickly diagnosed because of these messages.  As far as I know, my 
suggestion to increase /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio to kick pdflush 
earlier has prevented the slab allocation failures and not required 
delayed acks for nfsd."

--

The current value is 10, what value do you suggest I try?

$ cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
10

Justin.

Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[Justin Piszcz]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
>> Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
>> Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
>> Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (7 days old)
>> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309
>>
>
> I'd be interested to hear from Justin if reducing
> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio as I earlier suggested helps.
>
> ZONE_NORMAL isn't much larger than ZONE_DMA32 on this machine and both
> lowmem zones have an abundance of free memory which suggests pdflush's
> ratio isn't being met to commence background writeout while at the same
> time ZONE_NORMAL is being depleted as the result of constant nfs
> GFP_ATOMIC allocations that cannot try direct reclaim.
>

Hello,

http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/30960/

"It's funny, though, that the problem that originally started this thread 
was quickly diagnosed because of these messages.  As far as I know, my 
suggestion to increase /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio to kick pdflush 
earlier has prevented the slab allocation failures and not required 
delayed acks for nfsd."

--

The current value is 10, what value do you suggest I try?

$ cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
10

Justin.

Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> The current value is 10, what value do you suggest I try?
> 
> $ cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> 10
> 

Looking at your initial bug report, it doesn't look like a background 
writeout issue:

[415964.022375] Active_anon:154810 active_file:131162 inactive_anon:33447
[415964.022375]  inactive_file:690987 unevictable:0 dirty:112116 writeback:0 unstable:0
[415964.022375]  free:8662 slab:965366 mapped:9316 pagetables:4618 bounce:0
[415964.022375] DMA free:9692kB min:16kB low:20kB high:24kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:8668kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3246 7980 7980
[415964.022375] DMA32 free:21312kB min:6656kB low:8320kB high:9984kB active_anon:118464kB inactive_anon:23908kB active_file:174708kB inactive_file:1206812kB unevictable:0kB present:3324312kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 4734 4734
[415964.022375] Normal free:3644kB min:9708kB low:12132kB high:14560kB active_anon:500776kB inactive_anon:109880kB active_file:349940kB inactive_file:1557136kB unevictable:0kB present:4848000kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
...
[415964.022375] 2277376 pages RAM

Ignore the all_unreclaimable information, this is a GFP_ATOMIC allocation 
so we can't reclaim.

You have an 8G machine and only 437K is dirty (which is why pdflush hasn't 
kicked in yet).  You do have over 3.5G of slab allocated, however.

This appears related to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518, 
but that could be confirmed with slabtop.

Re: [Bug #13648] nfsd: page allocation failure

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> The current value is 10, what value do you suggest I try?
> 
> $ cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio
> 10
> 

Looking at your initial bug report, it doesn't look like a background 
writeout issue:

[415964.022375] Active_anon:154810 active_file:131162 inactive_anon:33447
[415964.022375]  inactive_file:690987 unevictable:0 dirty:112116 writeback:0 unstable:0
[415964.022375]  free:8662 slab:965366 mapped:9316 pagetables:4618 bounce:0
[415964.022375] DMA free:9692kB min:16kB low:20kB high:24kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:8668kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 3246 7980 7980
[415964.022375] DMA32 free:21312kB min:6656kB low:8320kB high:9984kB active_anon:118464kB inactive_anon:23908kB active_file:174708kB inactive_file:1206812kB unevictable:0kB present:3324312kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 4734 4734
[415964.022375] Normal free:3644kB min:9708kB low:12132kB high:14560kB active_anon:500776kB inactive_anon:109880kB active_file:349940kB inactive_file:1557136kB unevictable:0kB present:4848000kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[415964.022375] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
...
[415964.022375] 2277376 pages RAM

Ignore the all_unreclaimable information, this is a GFP_ATOMIC allocation 
so we can't reclaim.

You have an 8G machine and only 437K is dirty (which is why pdflush hasn't 
kicked in yet).  You do have over 3.5G of slab allocated, however.

This appears related to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518, 
but that could be confirmed with slabtop.

[Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95

[Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Joao Correia]

No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
following:

(patch by Ingo)

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
  */
-#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	262144UL
+#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	1048576UL

 extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
 extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];

and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing

include/linux/sched.h

# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL

to

# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL


I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
between me and Americo.

Thank you very much for your time,
Joao Correia
Centro de Informatica
Universidade da Beira Interior
Portugal



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
> Subject         : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
> Submitter       : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Joao Correia]

No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
following:

(patch by Ingo)

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
  */
-#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	262144UL
+#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES	1048576UL

 extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
 extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];

and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing

include/linux/sched.h

# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL

to

# define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL


I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
between me and Americo.

Thank you very much for your time,
Joao Correia
Centro de Informatica
Universidade da Beira Interior
Portugal



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
> Subject         : Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
> Submitter       : Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2009-06-27 16:07 (2 days old)
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95
>
>
>

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Américo Wang]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Joao Correia<joaomiguelcorreia-Re5JQEeQqe8@public.gmane.orgm> wrote:
> No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
> some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
> following:
>
> (patch by Ingo)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
> --- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
>  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
>  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
>  */
> -#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        262144UL
> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        1048576UL
>
>  extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
>  extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];
>
> and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing
>
> include/linux/sched.h
>
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
>
> to
>
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL
>
>
> I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
> which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
> is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
> between me and Americo.

How about changing MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 16?

kernel/lockdep_internals.h:59:#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS	15

And can you make a complete patch and send it to lkml with Peter and me
Cc'ed?

Thank you!

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Américo Wang]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Joao Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> wrote:
> No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
> some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
> following:
>
> (patch by Ingo)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
> --- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
>  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
>  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
>  */
> -#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        262144UL
> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        1048576UL
>
>  extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
>  extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];
>
> and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing
>
> include/linux/sched.h
>
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
>
> to
>
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL
>
>
> I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
> which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
> is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
> between me and Americo.

How about changing MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 16?

kernel/lockdep_internals.h:59:#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS	15

And can you make a complete patch and send it to lkml with Peter and me
Cc'ed?

Thank you!

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Joao Correia]

Already testing the changes, just to see if something else breaks.

Any special notes on the patch (a basic guideline info on patches
would be great, just so i dont mess it up)? Never submited one before.

Joao Correia

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Joao Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
>> some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
>> following:
>>
>> (patch by Ingo)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> +++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
>>  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
>>  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
>>  */
>> -#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        262144UL
>> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        1048576UL
>>
>>  extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
>>  extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];
>>
>> and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing
>>
>> include/linux/sched.h
>>
>> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
>>
>> to
>>
>> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL
>>
>>
>> I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
>> which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
>> is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
>> between me and Americo.
>
> How about changing MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 16?
>
> kernel/lockdep_internals.h:59:#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS   15
>
> And can you make a complete patch and send it to lkml with Peter and me
> Cc'ed?
>
> Thank you!
>

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Joao Correia]

Already testing the changes, just to see if something else breaks.

Any special notes on the patch (a basic guideline info on patches
would be great, just so i dont mess it up)? Never submited one before.

Joao Correia

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Joao Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No formal patch has been sent yet, that i am aware of. I have made
>> some changes following suggestion by Americo Wang advise, to the
>> following:
>>
>> (patch by Ingo)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> index 699a2ac..031f4c6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> +++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
>>  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
>>  * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
>>  */
>> -#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        262144UL
>> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES        1048576UL
>>
>>  extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
>>  extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];
>>
>> and afterwards, a new bug popped up, solved by changing
>>
>> include/linux/sched.h
>>
>> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
>>
>> to
>>
>> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 96UL
>>
>>
>> I have now found a third limit bug, related to MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS,
>> which was hidden so far, which im trying to raise and replicate. This
>> is being discussed in detail in another message exchange on the lkml,
>> between me and Americo.
>
> How about changing MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 16?
>
> kernel/lockdep_internals.h:59:#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS   15
>
> And can you make a complete patch and send it to lkml with Peter and me
> Cc'ed?
>
> Thank you!
>

Re: [Bug #13660] Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

[Américo Wang]

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Joao
Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Already testing the changes, just to see if something else breaks.
>
> Any special notes on the patch (a basic guideline info on patches
> would be great, just so i dont mess it up)? Never submited one before.

Yes, check Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/email-clients.txt.

I am not sure if Peter likes them, but it is a good idea to split them
and send one by one.

Good luck!

[Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668
Subject		: Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.
Submitter	: Rob Landley <rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-27 18:08 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159

[Bug #13668] Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668
Subject		: Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.
Submitter	: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Date		: 2009-06-27 18:08 (2 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159

[Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
Subject		: Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?
Submitter	: Michael Tokarev <mjt-XAri/EZa3C4vJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-15 14:41 (14 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4

[Bug #13651] Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
Subject		: Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?
Submitter	: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-15 14:41 (14 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4

[Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/

[Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Etienne Basset]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
> Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
> Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (3 days old)
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
> Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/
> 
> 
> 
yes, patch is not yet upstream;
2.6.31-rc1 + bart patch resumes from STR
current git + bart patch resume from STR fails, STR seems to have been broken again
(i was confident that the post-rc1 MCE fixes would correct the fact that computer hangs
 a few minutes after resume, but computer doesn't resume at all)


Etienne

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[David Miller]

From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:09 +0200

> yes, patch is not yet upstream;

I'll take care of pushing this around today.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Etienne Basset]

David Miller wrote:
> From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:09 +0200
> 
>> yes, patch is not yet upstream;
> 
> I'll take care of pushing this around today.
> 
Hi,

thank you ; 
i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1

etienne@etienne-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git bisect good        
a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b is first bad commit
commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b             
Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>      
Date:   Tue Jun 23 23:52:17 2009 -0700                      

    ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
                                                      
    Make hwif->rq point to PM request during PM sequence and do not allow
    any other types of requests to slip in (the old comment was never correct
    as there should be no such requests generated during PM sequence).       
                                                                             
    Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>            
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>   

To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
1) apply Bart's patch
2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

thanks
Etienne           

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Etienne Basset]

David Miller wrote:
> From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:09 +0200
> 
>> yes, patch is not yet upstream;
> 
> I'll take care of pushing this around today.
> 
Hi,

thank you ; 
i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1

etienne@etienne-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git bisect good        
a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b is first bad commit
commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b             
Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>      
Date:   Tue Jun 23 23:52:17 2009 -0700                      

    ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
                                                      
    Make hwif->rq point to PM request during PM sequence and do not allow
    any other types of requests to slip in (the old comment was never correct
    as there should be no such requests generated during PM sequence).       
                                                                             
    Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>            
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>   

To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
1) apply Bart's patch
2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

thanks
Etienne           

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1
> commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.

Thanks,
Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1
> commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.

Thanks,
Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.

STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
right thing.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :

> 1) apply Bart's patch

This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.

> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

This is already in Linus's tree.


Thanks,
Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.

STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
right thing.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:

> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :

> 1) apply Bart's patch

This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.

> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

This is already in Linus's tree.


Thanks,
Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> 
> STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> right thing.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 
> > 1) apply Bart's patch
> 
> This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> 
> > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> 

Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)

Here is what i have traced:

        hibernate(kernel/power/hibernate.c)
        --> hibernation_snapshot
        --> dpm_resume_end
        --> dpm_resume
        --> device_resume
        --> dev->bus->resume(generic_ide_resume), dev_name(dev) = 0.0
        --> blk_execute_rq
        {
                DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
                ...
                wait_for_completion(&wait);     // stop here
                ...
        }

and I have tried to revert this part of the above patch:

-
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
 repeat:
                prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
+
+               if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
+                       rq = hwif->rq;
+               else
+                       WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
+

it works! need more time to test!

thanks!
Wu Zhangjin

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> 
> STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> right thing.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> 
> > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 
> > 1) apply Bart's patch
> 
> This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> 
> > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> 

Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)

Here is what i have traced:

        hibernate(kernel/power/hibernate.c)
        --> hibernation_snapshot
        --> dpm_resume_end
        --> dpm_resume
        --> device_resume
        --> dev->bus->resume(generic_ide_resume), dev_name(dev) = 0.0
        --> blk_execute_rq
        {
                DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
                ...
                wait_for_completion(&wait);     // stop here
                ...
        }

and I have tried to revert this part of the above patch:

-
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
 repeat:
                prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
+
+               if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
+                       rq = hwif->rq;
+               else
+                       WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
+

it works! need more time to test!

thanks!
Wu Zhangjin

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > 
> > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > right thing.
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > 
> > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > 
> > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > 
> > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > 
> 
> Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)

Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
(thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).

The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):

@@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
                startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 
-               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
+               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
+                       rq = hwif->rq;
+                       hwif->rq = NULL;
                        goto repeat;
+               }
        } else
                goto plug_device;
 out:

and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 

Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?

[ Dave: while I appreciate fast handling of my patches I had strongly
  suggested giving this particular one some extra testing (because there
  were a lot of changes in between the time that it has been tested
  against other kernel subsystems).  Yet, it seems that its linux-next
  exposure was minimal at best..  :( ]

---
 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > 
> > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > right thing.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > 
> > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > 
> > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > 
> > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> 
> Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> 
> The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> 
> @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
>                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
>                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  
> -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>                         goto repeat;
> +               }
>         } else
>                 goto plug_device;
>  out:
> 
> and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> 
> Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?

Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():

---
 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else
@@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
-			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
+			}
 			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 			plug_device = 1;
 		}
@@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	 */
 	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
-		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-		hwif->rq = NULL;
+		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+			hwif->rq = NULL;
+		}
 		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 		plug_device = 1;
 	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > 
> > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > right thing.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > 
> > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > 
> > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > 
> > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> 
> Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> 
> The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> 
> @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
>                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
>                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  
> -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>                         goto repeat;
> +               }
>         } else
>                 goto plug_device;
>  out:
> 
> and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> 
> Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?

Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():

---
 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else
@@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
-			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
+			}
 			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 			plug_device = 1;
 		}
@@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	 */
 	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
-		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-		hwif->rq = NULL;
+		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+			hwif->rq = NULL;
+		}
 		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 		plug_device = 1;
 	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Bartlomiej
Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():

This works great for. Survived STR, STD. I just applied on top vanilla
latest Linus's git pull. Nothing else to revert.

Thanks,
Jeff.


> ---
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>
>                if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>                        rq = hwif->rq;
> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>                        goto repeat;
>                }
>        } else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>                enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>                if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +                               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       }
>                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>                        plug_device = 1;
>                }
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>         */
>        if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>                BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -               hwif->rq = NULL;
> +               if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +               }
>                ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>                plug_device = 1;
>        }
>

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, BartlomiejZolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
This works great for. Survived STR, STD. I just applied on top vanillalatest Linus's git pull. Nothing else to revert.
Thanks,Jeff.

> --->  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++----->  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)>> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c> ===================================================================> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:>>                if (startstop == ide_stopped) {>                        rq = hwif->rq;> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;>                        goto repeat;>                }>        } else> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat>                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);>                enable_irq(hwif->irq);>                if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {> -                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {> +                               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;> +                       }>                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);>                        plug_device = 1;>                }> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev>         */>        if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {>                BUG_ON(hwif->handler);> -               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;> -               hwif->rq = NULL;> +               if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {> +                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;> +               }>                ide_unlock_port(hwif);>                plug_device = 1;>        }>ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Bartlomiej
Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():

This works great for. Survived STR, STD. I just applied on top vanilla
latest Linus's git pull. Nothing else to revert.

Thanks,
Jeff.


> ---
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>
>                if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>                        rq = hwif->rq;
> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>                        goto repeat;
>                }
>        } else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>                enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>                if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +                               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
> +                       }
>                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>                        plug_device = 1;
>                }
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>         */
>        if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>                BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -               hwif->rq = NULL;
> +               if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> +               }
>                ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>                plug_device = 1;
>        }
>

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Etienne Basset]

Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Bartlomiej
> Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
>> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> 
> This works great for. Survived STR, STD. I just applied on top vanilla
> latest Linus's git pull. Nothing else to revert.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff.
> 
> 
i confirm, this  works for me too :)
thanks,
Etienne


>> ---
>>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>>
>>                if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>>                        rq = hwif->rq;
>> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
>> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>>                        goto repeat;
>>                }
>>        } else
>> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>>                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>>                enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>>                if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>> -                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
>> +                               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       }
>>                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>>                        plug_device = 1;
>>                }
>> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>>         */
>>        if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>>                BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
>> -               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> -               hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +               if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
>> +                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +               }
>>                ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>>                plug_device = 1;
>>        }
>>

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Etienne Basset]

Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Bartlomiej
> Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
>> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> 
> This works great for. Survived STR, STD. I just applied on top vanilla
> latest Linus's git pull. Nothing else to revert.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff.
> 
> 
i confirm, this  works for me too :)
thanks,
Etienne


>> ---
>>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>>
>>                if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>>                        rq = hwif->rq;
>> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
>> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>>                        goto repeat;
>>                }
>>        } else
>> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>>                spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>>                enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>>                if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>> -                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> -                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
>> +                               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> +                               hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +                       }
>>                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>>                        plug_device = 1;
>>                }
>> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>>         */
>>        if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>>                BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
>> -               rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> -               hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +               if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
>> +                       rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
>> +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
>> +               }
>>                ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>>                plug_device = 1;
>>        }
>>

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > 
> > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > right thing.
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > 
> > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > 
> > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > 
> > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > 
> > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > 
> > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > 
> > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> >  
> > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> >                         goto repeat;
> > +               }
> >         } else
> >                 goto plug_device;
> >  out:
> > 
> > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > 
> > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> 
> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> 

Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
git repository.

commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700

    Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
    
    * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
      ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
      ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
      ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
      ide: always kill the whole request on error
      ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
requests

it this too old? should i merge another git repository?

I have tried to apply it manually, but unfortunately, also not work. any
other patch needed?

Thanks!
Wu Zhangjin
> ---
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>  
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>  			rq = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
>  			goto repeat;
>  		}
>  	} else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			}
>  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  			plug_device = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	 */
>  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		}
>  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  		plug_device = 1;
>  	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > 
> > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > right thing.
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > 
> > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > 
> > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > 
> > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > 
> > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > 
> > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > 
> > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> >  
> > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> >                         goto repeat;
> > +               }
> >         } else
> >                 goto plug_device;
> >  out:
> > 
> > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > 
> > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> 
> Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> 

Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
git repository.

commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700

    Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
    
    * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
      ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
      ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
      ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
      ide: always kill the whole request on error
      ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
requests

it this too old? should i merge another git repository?

I have tried to apply it manually, but unfortunately, also not work. any
other patch needed?

Thanks!
Wu Zhangjin
> ---
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>  
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>  			rq = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
>  			goto repeat;
>  		}
>  	} else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			}
>  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  			plug_device = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	 */
>  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		}
>  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  		plug_device = 1;
>  	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Wu Zhangjin<wuzhangjin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> I have tried to apply it manually, but unfortunately, also not work. any
> other patch needed?

You need to be undo those two patches below ...

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

or try to pull from Linus's tree and try again. Latest is now ...

commit d960eea974f5e500c0dcb95a934239cc1f481cfd
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 14:54:11 2009 -0700

    kernel-doc: move ignoring kmemcheck



Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Jeff Chua]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Wu Zhangjin<wuzhangjin@gmail.com> wrote:
> it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> I have tried to apply it manually, but unfortunately, also not work. any
> other patch needed?

You need to be undo those two patches below ...

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b

or try to pull from Linus's tree and try again. Latest is now ...

commit d960eea974f5e500c0dcb95a934239cc1f481cfd
Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 14:54:11 2009 -0700

    kernel-doc: move ignoring kmemcheck



Jeff.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Ralf Baechle]

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:46:43AM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:

> Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> git repository.

The master branch of linux-mips.org has no IDE changes over Linus' tree.

  Ralf

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Ralf Baechle]

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:46:43AM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:

> Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> git repository.

The master branch of linux-mips.org has no IDE changes over Linus' tree.

  Ralf

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > 
> > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > right thing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > 
> > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > 
> > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > 
> > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > >  
> > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > >                         goto repeat;
> > > +               }
> > >         } else
> > >                 goto plug_device;
> > >  out:
> > > 
> > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > 
> > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > 
> > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> git repository.
> 
> commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> 
>     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
>     
>     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
>       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
>       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
>       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
>       ide: always kill the whole request on error
>       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> requests
> 
> it this too old? should i merge another git repository?

Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
(as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).

Anyway since the patch was confirmed to fix the problem by
Jeff and Etienne here is the final version for Dave.

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again

It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
is blocked.

Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.

Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
Added patch description, no other changes.

 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else
@@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
-			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
+			}
 			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 			plug_device = 1;
 		}
@@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	 */
 	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
-		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-		hwif->rq = NULL;
+		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+			hwif->rq = NULL;
+		}
 		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 		plug_device = 1;
 	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > 
> > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > right thing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > 
> > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > 
> > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > 
> > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > >  
> > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > >                         goto repeat;
> > > +               }
> > >         } else
> > >                 goto plug_device;
> > >  out:
> > > 
> > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > 
> > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > 
> > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> git repository.
> 
> commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> 
>     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
>     
>     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
>       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
>       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
>       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
>       ide: always kill the whole request on error
>       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> requests
> 
> it this too old? should i merge another git repository?

Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
(as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).

Anyway since the patch was confirmed to fix the problem by
Jeff and Etienne here is the final version for Dave.

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again

It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
is blocked.

Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.

Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
Added patch description, no other changes.

 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else
@@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
-			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
+			}
 			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 			plug_device = 1;
 		}
@@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	 */
 	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
-		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-		hwif->rq = NULL;
+		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+			hwif->rq = NULL;
+		}
 		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 		plug_device = 1;
 	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:13 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > > right thing.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > > Basset<etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > > 
> > > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > > 
> > > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > > >  
> > > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > > >                         goto repeat;
> > > > +               }
> > > >         } else
> > > >                 goto plug_device;
> > > >  out:
> > > > 
> > > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > > 
> > > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > > 
> > > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> > you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> > git repository.
> > 
> > commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> > Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> > Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> > 
> >     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
> >     
> >     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
> >       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> > machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
> >       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
> >       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
> >       ide: always kill the whole request on error
> >       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> > requests
> > 
> > it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> 
> Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
> (as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).

I just cloned the linux-next git repo, and tested your patch with
STD/Hibernation, unfortunately, it also not work :-(

here is the Call Trace:

blk_delete_timer+0x0/0x20
blk_requeue_request+0x24/0xd0
ide_requeue_and_plug+0x38/0xb0
ide_intr+0x120/0x300             --->  ide_intr....
handle_IRQ_event+0x94/0x230
handle_level_irq+0x7c/0x120
mach_irq_dispatch+0xc8/0x158
ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
cpu_idle+0x30/0x60
start_kernel+0x330/0x34c

If _NOT_ apply your patch and comment this part, it works:

diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
index d5f3c77..a45de2b 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -468,12 +468,12 @@ void do_ide_request(struct request_queue *q)
                ide_hwif_t *prev_port;
 repeat:
                prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
-
+/*
                if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
                        rq = hwif->rq;
                else
                        WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
-
+*/
                if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_SLEEPING &&
                    time_after(drive->sleep, jiffies)) {
                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 

Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
> 
> Anyway since the patch was confirmed to fix the problem by
> Jeff and Etienne here is the final version for Dave.
> 
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again
> 
> It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> ("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
> into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
> in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
> in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
> is blocked.
> 
> Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Added patch description, no other changes.
> 
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>  
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>  			rq = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
>  			goto repeat;
>  		}
>  	} else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			}
>  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  			plug_device = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	 */
>  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		}
>  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  		plug_device = 1;
>  	}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:13 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > > right thing.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > > 
> > > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > > 
> > > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > > >  
> > > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > > >                         goto repeat;
> > > > +               }
> > > >         } else
> > > >                 goto plug_device;
> > > >  out:
> > > > 
> > > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > > 
> > > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > > 
> > > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> > you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> > git repository.
> > 
> > commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> > Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> > 
> >     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
> >     
> >     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
> >       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> > machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
> >       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
> >       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
> >       ide: always kill the whole request on error
> >       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> > requests
> > 
> > it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> 
> Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
> (as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).

I just cloned the linux-next git repo, and tested your patch with
STD/Hibernation, unfortunately, it also not work :-(

here is the Call Trace:

blk_delete_timer+0x0/0x20
blk_requeue_request+0x24/0xd0
ide_requeue_and_plug+0x38/0xb0
ide_intr+0x120/0x300             --->  ide_intr....
handle_IRQ_event+0x94/0x230
handle_level_irq+0x7c/0x120
mach_irq_dispatch+0xc8/0x158
ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
cpu_idle+0x30/0x60
start_kernel+0x330/0x34c

If _NOT_ apply your patch and comment this part, it works:

diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
index d5f3c77..a45de2b 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -468,12 +468,12 @@ void do_ide_request(struct request_queue *q)
                ide_hwif_t *prev_port;
 repeat:
                prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
-
+/*
                if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
                        rq = hwif->rq;
                else
                        WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
-
+*/
                if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_SLEEPING &&
                    time_after(drive->sleep, jiffies)) {
                        ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 

Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
> 
> Anyway since the patch was confirmed to fix the problem by
> Jeff and Etienne here is the final version for Dave.
> 
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again
> 
> It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> ("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
> into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
> in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
> in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
> is blocked.
> 
> Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> ---
> Added patch description, no other changes.
> 
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>  
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>  			rq = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
>  			goto repeat;
>  		}
>  	} else
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			}
>  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  			plug_device = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	 */
>  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		}
>  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  		plug_device = 1;
>  	}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 11:58 +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:13 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > > > right thing.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > > > 
> > > > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > > > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > > > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > > > >  
> > > > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > > > >                         goto repeat;
> > > > > +               }
> > > > >         } else
> > > > >                 goto plug_device;
> > > > >  out:
> > > > > 
> > > > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > > > 
> > > > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > > > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> > > you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> > > git repository.
> > > 
> > > commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> > > Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> > > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> > > 
> > >     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
> > >     
> > >     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
> > >       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> > > machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
> > >       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
> > >       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
> > >       ide: always kill the whole request on error
> > >       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> > > requests
> > > 
> > > it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> > 
> > Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
> > (as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).
> 
> I just cloned the linux-next git repo, and tested your patch with
> STD/Hibernation, unfortunately, it also not work :-(
> 
> here is the Call Trace:
> 
> blk_delete_timer+0x0/0x20
> blk_requeue_request+0x24/0xd0
> ide_requeue_and_plug+0x38/0xb0
> ide_intr+0x120/0x300             --->  ide_intr....
> handle_IRQ_event+0x94/0x230
> handle_level_irq+0x7c/0x120
> mach_irq_dispatch+0xc8/0x158
> ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
> cpu_idle+0x30/0x60
> start_kernel+0x330/0x34c
> 
There are two more lines after the Call Trace:

Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt.

> If _NOT_ apply your patch and comment this part, it works:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> index d5f3c77..a45de2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -468,12 +468,12 @@ void do_ide_request(struct request_queue *q)
>                 ide_hwif_t *prev_port;
>  repeat:
>                 prev_port = hwif->host->cur_port;
> -
> +/*
>                 if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED)
>                         rq = hwif->rq;
>                 else
>                         WARN_ON_ONCE(hwif->rq);
> -
> +*/
>                 if (drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_SLEEPING &&
>                     time_after(drive->sleep, jiffies)) {
>                         ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  
> 
> Regards,
> Wu Zhangjin
> > 
> > Anyway since the patch was confirmed to fix the problem by
> > Jeff and Etienne here is the final version for Dave.
> > 
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again
> > 
> > It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > ("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
> > into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
> > in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
> > in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
> > is blocked.
> > 
> > Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> > Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Added patch description, no other changes.
> > 
> >  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> > @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
> >  
> >  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> >  			rq = hwif->rq;
> > -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> > +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> > +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> >  			goto repeat;
> >  		}
> >  	} else
> > @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
> >  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> >  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
> >  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> > -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> > -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> > +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> > +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> > +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> > +			}
> >  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
> >  			plug_device = 1;
> >  		}
> > @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
> >  	 */
> >  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> >  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> > -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> > -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> > +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> > +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> > +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> > +		}
> >  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
> >  		plug_device = 1;
> >  	}
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Friday 03 July 2009 05:58:25 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:13 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 July 2009 03:46:43 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 18:29 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:21:25 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 16:47:41 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:31 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Jeff Chua<jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I just tried, and it "seems" to work. Will try a few more cycles.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > STD/STR survived quite a few cycles now. Patch seems to be doing the
> > > > > > > right thing.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Etienne
> > > > > > > Basset<etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 1) apply Bart's patch
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This is not yet in Linus's tree. And much needed to really fix the problem.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, This commit must be reverted, otherwise, STD/Hibernation will not
> > > > > > work either. I have tested it on two different loongson-based machines:
> > > > > > fuloong2e box and yeeloong2f netbook.(loongson is mips compatiable)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since it seems like Dave is taking his sweet time with doing the revert
> > > > > I stared at the code a bit more and I think that I finally found the bug
> > > > > (thanks to your debugging work for giving me the right hint!).
> > > > > 
> > > > > The patch needs to take into the account a new code introduced by the recent
> > > > > block layer changes (commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879):
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -555,8 +560,11 @@ repeat:
> > > > >                 startstop = start_request(drive, rq);
> > > > >                 spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
> > > > >  
> > > > > -               if (startstop == ide_stopped)
> > > > > +               if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
> > > > > +                       rq = hwif->rq;
> > > > > +                       hwif->rq = NULL;
> > > > >                         goto repeat;
> > > > > +               }
> > > > >         } else
> > > > >                 goto plug_device;
> > > > >  out:
> > > > > 
> > > > > and not zero hwif->rq if the device is blocked. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the issue?
> > > > 
> > > > Here is the more complete version, also taking into the account changes
> > > > in ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry():
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I can not apply this patch directly, which original version did
> > > you use? I used the one in the master branch of linux-mips development
> > > git repository.
> > > 
> > > commit 5a4f13fad1ab5bd08dea78fc55321e429d83cddf
> > > Merge: ec9c45d e18ed14
> > > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Date:   Mon Jun 29 20:07:43 2009 -0700
> > > 
> > >     Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6
> > >     
> > >     * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6:
> > >       ide: memory overrun in ide_get_identity_ioctl() on big endian
> > > machines using ioctl HDIO_OBSOLETE_IDENTITY
> > >       ide: fix resume for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEACPI=y
> > >       ide-cd: handle fragmented packet commands gracefully
> > >       ide: always kill the whole request on error
> > >       ide: fix ide_kill_rq() for special ide-{floppy,tape} driver
> > > requests
> > > 
> > > it this too old? should i merge another git repository?
> > 
> > Weird, I used linux-next but Linus' tree should also be fine
> > (as it matches linux-next w.r.t. ide currently).
> 
> I just cloned the linux-next git repo, and tested your patch with
> STD/Hibernation, unfortunately, it also not work :-(
> 
> here is the Call Trace:
> 
> blk_delete_timer+0x0/0x20
> blk_requeue_request+0x24/0xd0
> ide_requeue_and_plug+0x38/0xb0
> ide_intr+0x120/0x300             --->  ide_intr....
> handle_IRQ_event+0x94/0x230
> handle_level_irq+0x7c/0x120
> mach_irq_dispatch+0xc8/0x158
> ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
> cpu_idle+0x30/0x60
> start_kernel+0x330/0x34c
> 
> If _NOT_ apply your patch and comment this part, it works:

OK, I see another gotcha added by recent changes, we need to explicitly
initialize rq_in_flight variables now.  Revised patch below..

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again (for real)

It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
is blocked.

Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.

Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
Added patch description, no other changes.

 drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
 
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
 			rq = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
 			goto repeat;
 		}
 	} else
@@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 	unsigned long	flags;
 	int		wait = -1;
 	int		plug_device = 0;
-	struct request	*uninitialized_var(rq_in_flight);
+	struct request	*rq_in_flight = NULL;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&hwif->lock, flags);
 
@@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
 		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
 		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
 		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
-			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-			hwif->rq = NULL;
+			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+				hwif->rq = NULL;
+			}
 			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 			plug_device = 1;
 		}
@@ -775,7 +778,7 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	ide_startstop_t startstop;
 	irqreturn_t irq_ret = IRQ_NONE;
 	int plug_device = 0;
-	struct request *uninitialized_var(rq_in_flight);
+	struct request *rq_in_flight = NULL;
 
 	if (host->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE) {
 		if (hwif != host->cur_port)
@@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
 	 */
 	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
 		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
-		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
-		hwif->rq = NULL;
+		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
+			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
+			hwif->rq = NULL;
+		}
 		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
 		plug_device = 1;
 	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Wu Zhangjin]

Hi,

> OK, I see another gotcha added by recent changes, we need to explicitly
> initialize rq_in_flight variables now.  Revised patch below..
> 

Sorry, STD also not work. if apply this patch, the same problem as not
apply it, it stopped at:

...
PM: Crete hibernation image:
PM: Need to copy ... pages
PM: Hibernation image created ...

I think it's better to revert this commit:
 a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b ("ide: improve handling of
Power Management requests")

Regards,
Wu Zhangjin

> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: make resume work again (for real)
> 
> It turns out that commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> ("ide: improve handling of Power Management requests") needs to take
> into the account a new code added by the recent block layer changes
> in commit 8f6205cd572fece673da0255d74843680f67f879 ("ide: dequeue
> in-flight request") and prevent clearing of hwif->rq if the device
> is blocked.
> 
> Thanks to Etienne, Wu and Jeff for help in fixing the issue.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> Reported-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> ---
> Added patch description, no other changes.
> 
>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ repeat:
>  
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
>  			rq = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0)
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
>  			goto repeat;
>  		}
>  	} else
> @@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  	unsigned long	flags;
>  	int		wait = -1;
>  	int		plug_device = 0;
> -	struct request	*uninitialized_var(rq_in_flight);
> +	struct request	*rq_in_flight = NULL;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&hwif->lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -679,8 +680,10 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
>  		spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
>  		enable_irq(hwif->irq);
>  		if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
> -			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +				rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +				hwif->rq = NULL;
> +			}
>  			ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  			plug_device = 1;
>  		}
> @@ -775,7 +778,7 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	ide_startstop_t startstop;
>  	irqreturn_t irq_ret = IRQ_NONE;
>  	int plug_device = 0;
> -	struct request *uninitialized_var(rq_in_flight);
> +	struct request *rq_in_flight = NULL;
>  
>  	if (host->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE) {
>  		if (hwif != host->cur_port)
> @@ -856,8 +859,10 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
>  	 */
>  	if (startstop == ide_stopped && hwif->polling == 0) {
>  		BUG_ON(hwif->handler);
> -		rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> -		hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		if ((drive->dev_flags & IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED) == 0) {
> +			rq_in_flight = hwif->rq;
> +			hwif->rq = NULL;
> +		}
>  		ide_unlock_port(hwif);
>  		plug_device = 1;
>  	}

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Friday 03 July 2009 17:31:36 Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > OK, I see another gotcha added by recent changes, we need to explicitly
> > initialize rq_in_flight variables now.  Revised patch below..
> > 
> 
> Sorry, STD also not work. if apply this patch, the same problem as not
> apply it, it stopped at:
> 
> ...
> PM: Crete hibernation image:
> PM: Need to copy ... pages
> PM: Hibernation image created ...
> 
> I think it's better to revert this commit:
>  a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b ("ide: improve handling of
> Power Management requests")
 
I completely agree and I've already requested this a week ago
(this commit was not meant for going straight to -rc tree anyway).

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[David Miller]

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:57:59 +0200

>> I think it's better to revert this commit:
>>  a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b ("ide: improve handling of
>> Power Management requests")
>  
> I completely agree and I've already requested this a week ago
> (this commit was not meant for going straight to -rc tree anyway).

I'll revert this today and push that to Linus.

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Monday 29 June 2009 17:51:35 Etienne Basset wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:09 +0200
> > 
> >> yes, patch is not yet upstream;
> > 
> > I'll take care of pushing this around today.
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> thank you ; 
> i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1
> 
> etienne@etienne-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git bisect good        
> a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b is first bad commit

Thanks for finding it.

Dave, please just revert this patch (it wasn't meant for Linus' tree anyway).

> commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b             
> Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>      
> Date:   Tue Jun 23 23:52:17 2009 -0700                      
> 
>     ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
>                                                       
>     Make hwif->rq point to PM request during PM sequence and do not allow
>     any other types of requests to slip in (the old comment was never correct
>     as there should be no such requests generated during PM sequence).       
>                                                                              
>     Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>            
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>   
> 
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> 
> thanks
> Etienne           
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13663] suspend to ram regression (IDE related)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Monday 29 June 2009 17:51:35 Etienne Basset wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:09 +0200
> > 
> >> yes, patch is not yet upstream;
> > 
> > I'll take care of pushing this around today.
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> thank you ; 
> i ran a new bisection to identify the commit that cause pain after -rc1
> 
> etienne@etienne-desktop:~/linux-2.6$ git bisect good        
> a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b is first bad commit

Thanks for finding it.

Dave, please just revert this patch (it wasn't meant for Linus' tree anyway).

> commit a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b             
> Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>      
> Date:   Tue Jun 23 23:52:17 2009 -0700                      
> 
>     ide: improve handling of Power Management requests
>                                                       
>     Make hwif->rq point to PM request during PM sequence and do not allow
>     any other types of requests to slip in (the old comment was never correct
>     as there should be no such requests generated during PM sequence).       
>                                                                              
>     Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>            
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>   
> 
> To have STR/resume work with current git, I have to :
> 1) apply Bart's patch
> 2) revert this commit : a1317f714af7aed60ddc182d0122477cbe36ee9b
> 
> thanks
> Etienne           
> 
> 

[Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte-v18Uk5sXZWJeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (15 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh-N3TV7GIv+o9fyO9Q7EP/yw@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #13669] Kernel bug with dock driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (15 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>

2.6.31-rc9: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-09-06      153       27          27
  2009-08-26      152       33          30
  2009-08-20      150       35          32
  2009-08-10      148       39          37
  2009-08-02      145       44          39
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
Subject		: pcmcia cards stop working after resuming from snapshot cycle (hibernation)
Submitter	: Martin Steigerwald <Martin-SpPJhY7q8xqazgQtNeiOUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-09-01 19:44 (6 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
Subject		: joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks
Submitter	: Janos Laube <janos.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-08-24 14:18 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d07a9cba6be5c0e947afc1014b5a62182a86f1f1


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958
Subject		: ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
Submitter	: Marco Siviero <darker1985-LhojQA2xIZ1eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-08-10 15:03 (28 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject		: XFS regression
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-08-08 8:39 (30 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject		: Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter	: dienet <dienet-IjDXvh/HVVUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-31 15:17 (38 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg-au2b9oQwubsjnolme5KbmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (51 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot-5tc4TXWwyLM@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (51 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt-burXGKnpAKGzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (54 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject		: System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-14 10:31 (55 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (62 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (69 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (80 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85-whZMOeQn8C0@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (80 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (81 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml-VIXq6x/3rUk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (82 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin-0pWKB23IDFjrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (88 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (89 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (100 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (102 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (102 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (108 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (110 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (111 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (127 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (130 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (116 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (139 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (108 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (108 days old)

2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-08-26      152       33          30
  2009-08-20      150       35          32
  2009-08-10      148       39          37
  2009-08-02      145       44          39
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
Subject		: joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks
Submitter	: Janos Laube <janos.dev@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-08-24 14:18 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d07a9cba6be5c0e947afc1014b5a62182a86f1f1


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958
Subject		: ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
Submitter	: Marco Siviero <darker1985@slacky.it>
Date		: 2009-08-10 15:03 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject		: XFS regression
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-08-08 8:39 (18 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject		: Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter	: dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date		: 2009-07-31 15:17 (26 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (39 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (39 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (42 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject		: System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-14 10:31 (43 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (50 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (55 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (57 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (68 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (68 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (69 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (70 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (76 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (77 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (88 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (90 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (90 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (96 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (98 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (99 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (115 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (118 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (104 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (117 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (127 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14059
Subject		: DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
Submitter	: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date		: 2009-08-21 10:40 (5 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125085108431360&w=4
Handled-By	: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43107/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (92 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (119 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
		  David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (96 days old)

2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-08-20      150       35          32
  2009-08-10      148       39          37
  2009-08-02      145       44          39
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958
Subject		: ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
Submitter	: Marco Siviero <darker1985@slacky.it>
Date		: 2009-08-10 15:03 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject		: XFS regression
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-08-08 8:39 (12 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13933
Subject		: System lockup on dual Pentium-3 with kernel 2.6.30
Submitter	: Martin Rogge <marogge@onlinehome.de>
Date		: 2009-08-08 13:16 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject		: Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter	: dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date		: 2009-07-31 15:17 (20 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (33 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (33 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (36 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject		: System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-14 10:31 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (44 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (49 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (51 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (62 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (54 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (62 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (62 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (63 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (64 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (69 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (70 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (71 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (82 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (84 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (84 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (89 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (90 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (92 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (93 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (109 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (112 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (98 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (111 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (121 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (56 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>
Handled-By	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33626/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (86 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (113 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
		  David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (90 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (90 days old)

2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-08-10      148       39          37
  2009-08-02      145       44          39
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject		: XFS regression
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-08-08 8:39 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13945
Subject		: Kernel freezes dual pentium-3 system
Submitter	: Martin Rogge <marogge@onlinehome.de>
Date		: 2009-08-03 16:25 (7 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124931667320530&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject		: Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter	: dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date		: 2009-07-31 15:17 (10 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (23 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (23 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (26 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject		: System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter	: Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-14 10:31 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (34 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (39 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (41 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (44 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (52 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638
Subject		: rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards
Submitter	: jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at>
Date		: 2009-06-27 17:33 (44 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (44 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (46 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (52 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (52 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (53 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (54 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (59 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (60 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (61 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (72 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (74 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (74 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (79 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (80 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (83 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (99 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (102 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (88 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (101 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (111 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (121 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (76 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (103 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
		  David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (80 days old)

2.6.31-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-08-02      145       44          39
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject		: Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter	: dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date		: 2009-07-31 15:17 (3 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13886
Subject		: Suspend to disk no longer works in 2.6.30.2 with an EIDE drive
Submitter	:  <akwatts@ymail.com>
Date		: 2009-08-01 10:12 (2 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13865
Subject		: Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
Submitter	: cedric <cedric@belbone.be>
Date		: 2009-07-29 12:47 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (19 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (34 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (50 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (37 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (45 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (48 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638
Subject		: rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards
Submitter	: jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at>
Date		: 2009-06-27 17:33 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (37 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (39 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (39 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (47 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (47 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (52 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (53 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (54 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (65 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (67 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (67 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (72 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (72 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (73 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (75 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (76 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (92 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (95 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (81 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (94 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (104 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (114 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13897
Subject		: PAT wc & vmap mapping count issue
Submitter	: Jerome Glisse <glisse@freedesktop.org>
Date		: 2009-07-30 13:11 (4 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3869c4aa18835c8c61b44bd0f3ace36e9d3b5bd0
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124895237114605&w=4
Handled-By	: Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38436/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13884
Subject		: x86 CPA incorrect memtype reserving using set_pages_array_xx
Submitter	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date		: 2009-07-31 13:39 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9ae2847591c857bed44bc094b908b412bfa1b244
Handled-By	: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22552


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (69 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (77 days old)
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37837/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (96 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
		  David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (73 days old)

2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-07-27      143       48          45
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject		: iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter	: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date		: 2009-07-18 20:18 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject		: abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter	: Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date		: 2009-07-18 17:19 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter	: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date		: 2009-07-15 18:00 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751
Subject		: oops on HP/Compaq 6910p lid closure
Submitter	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date		: 2009-07-09 15:17 (18 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject		: 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter	: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date		: 2009-07-07 8:44 (20 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By	: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (25 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681
Subject		: A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics.
Submitter	: Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:06 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (43 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (30 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (38 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (41 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638
Subject		: rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards
Submitter	: jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at>
Date		: 2009-06-27 17:33 (30 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (30 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list@phuk.ath.cx>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (32 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (32 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (39 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (40 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (40 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124686965407853&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (45 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (47 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (52 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (53 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (58 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (60 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (60 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (65 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (65 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (68 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (69 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (70 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (85 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (88 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (74 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (87 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (107 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (62 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).

 Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now.
Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so
the bug should be still present.

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)
> 
> 

Thanks;
Alejandro

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).

 Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now.
Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so
the bug should be still present.

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)
> 
> 

Thanks;
Alejandro

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 02 August 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
>  Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now.
> Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so
> the bug should be still present.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> > Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> > Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 02 August 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
>  Sorry for the delay i did not have the time to test 2.6.31-rc* until now.
> Tried 2.6.31-rc5 the problem persist. The revert still fixes the issue; so
> the bug should be still present.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> > Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> > Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
> > Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (66 days old)

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-07-07      138       50          46
  2009-06-29      133       46          43
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject		: i915 phantom TV
Submitter	: Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-07-02 12:26 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject		: The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter	: Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:34 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13681
Subject		: A number of usb Devices causes Oops messages and kernel panics.
Submitter	: Alexander Kaltsas <alexkaltsas@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-30 13:06 (7 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13669
Subject		: Kernel bug with dock driver
Submitter	: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Date		: 2009-06-14 21:00 (23 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/216
Handled-By	: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13668
Subject		: Can't boot 2.6.30 powerpc kernel under qemu.
Submitter	: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Date		: 2009-06-27 18:08 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/159


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13660
Subject		: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs
Submitter	: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-27 16:07 (10 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/95


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
Subject		: Anyone know what happened with PC speaker in 2.6.30?
Submitter	: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-15 14:41 (22 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124507695427817&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (15 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13647
Subject		: fb/mmap lockdep report.
Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date		: 2009-06-21 13:33 (16 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=513adb58685615b0b1d47a3f0d40f5352beff189
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/90
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/21/122


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject		: warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-19 17:05 (18 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13644
Subject		: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
Submitter	: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date		: 2009-06-16 01:27 (21 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/15/630
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/504
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13638
Subject		: rt2870 driver is broken for (some) cards
Submitter	: jakob gruber <jakob.gruber@kabelnet.at>
Date		: 2009-06-27 17:33 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13634
Subject		: [drm:drm_wait_vblank] *ERROR* failed to acquire vblank counter, -22
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-27 07:02 (10 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624
Subject		: usb: wrong autosuspend initialization
Submitter	:  <list@phuk.ath.cx>
Date		: 2009-06-25 18:18 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Subject		: xfs hangs with assertion failed
Submitter	: Johannes Engel <jcnengel@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-25 10:07 (12 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13620
Subject		: acpi_enforce_resources broken - conflicting i2c module loaded on some EeePCs
Submitter	: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date		: 2009-06-25 08:31 (12 days old)
References	: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-June/002316.html>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject		: pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter	: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date		: 2009-06-19 13:33 (18 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject		: ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter	: Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-19 12:04 (18 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject		: random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter	: Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-18 12:44 (19 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject		: Tracelog during resume
Submitter	: Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-17 11:32 (20 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13554
Subject		: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686, KMS enabled: black screen, no X window
Submitter	: Jos van Wolput <wolput@onsneteindhoven.nl>
Date		: 2009-06-17 06:28 (20 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518
Subject		: slab grows with NFS write activity.
Submitter	: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrik@mail.ru>
Date		: 2009-06-12 09:51 (25 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject		: acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter	: Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date		: 2009-06-12 08:13 (25 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject		: D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter	: Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date		: 2009-06-11 20:12 (26 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject		: GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter	:  <sveina@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-10 20:04 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (32 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (33 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (37 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (38 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (40 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (40 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (45 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (49 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (50 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (65 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (68 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (54 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - hang on 2nd resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (57 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.4
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (67 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (77 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (84 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (87 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13663
Subject		: suspend to ram regression (IDE related)
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date		: 2009-06-26 17:40 (11 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/242
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/126
Handled-By	: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/32719/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649
Subject		: Bad page state in process with various applications
Submitter	: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-20 15:27 (17 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124551168828090&w=4
Handled-By	: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/33130/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (35 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28660/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (42 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have 
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize 
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/blackberry
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old)

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Tue,  7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 

 It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried
2.6.31-rc* though.

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old)
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Tue,  7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 

 It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried
2.6.31-rc* though.

> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (46 days old)
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Tue,  7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> 
>  It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried
> 2.6.31-rc* though.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Tue,  7 Jul 2009 02:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> 
>  It should be still listed 2.6.30.1 does not fix it. still not tried
> 2.6.31-rc* though.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael

2.6.30-rc8-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-06-07      110       35          31
  2009-05-31      100       32          27
  2009-05-24       92       34          27
  2009-05-16       81       36          33
  2009-04-25       55       36          26
  2009-04-17       37       35          28


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475
Subject		: suspend/hibernate lockdep warning
Submitter	: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-02 10:00 (6 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124393723321241&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13474
Subject		: Oops whilst booting
Submitter	: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-06-06 18:59 (2 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124431487924254&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13473
Subject		: Bug while trying to launch a KVM guest
Submitter	: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Date		: 2009-06-05 17:20 (3 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124422173129047&w=4
Handled-By	: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13472
Subject		: Oops with minicom and USB serial
Submitter	: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date		: 2009-06-05 1:37 (3 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416901026700&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13471
Subject		: Loading parport_pc kills the keyboard if ACPI is enabled
Submitter	: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Date		: 2009-06-04 9:12 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124410667532558&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13446
Subject		: resume after suspend-to-ram broken on Toshiba Satellite A100 with 2.6.30-rc8 (works in 2.6.28)
Submitter	: Andrea Iob <andrea_iob@yahoo.it>
Date		: 2009-06-03 21:42 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
Subject		: possible deadlock when doing governor switching
Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date		: 2009-05-31 16:36 (8 days old)
References	: http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
Handled-By	: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject		: Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter	: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-30 18:51 (9 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject		: adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter	: Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date		: 2009-05-28 7:59 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject		: pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter	: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date		: 2009-05-28 18:43 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
Subject		: Kernel boot hangs at about every second start when kms is activated
Submitter	: Martin Bammer <mrb74@gmx.at>
Date		: 2009-05-26 21:47 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13374
Subject		: reiserfs blocked for more than 120secs
Submitter	: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Date		: 2009-05-23 8:52 (16 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124306880410811&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/389


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13373
Subject		: fbcon, intelfb, i915: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter	: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-23 5:08 (16 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124305538130702&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13366
Subject		: About 80% of shutdowns fail (blocking)
Submitter	: Martin Bammer <mrb74@gmx.at>
Date		: 2009-05-23 00:58 (16 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (17 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject		: 2.6.30 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter	:  <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-20 14:09 (19 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject		: Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter	:  <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date		: 2009-05-19 09:08 (20 days old)
Handled-By	: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Subject		: [post 2.6.29 regression] hang during suspend of b44/b43 modules
Submitter	: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Date		: 2009-05-18 10:59 (21 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13330
Subject		: nfs4 NULL pointer dereference in _nfs4_do_setlk
Submitter	: Rich Ercolani <rercola@acm.jhu.edu>
Date		: 2009-05-17 04:44 (22 days old)
Handled-By	: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject		: b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter	: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-03 16:22 (36 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject		: Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter	: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date		: 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
Handled-By	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject		: AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter	: Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date		: 2009-04-30 8:51 (39 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13313
Subject		: vm86old oops
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@mail.by>
Date		: 2009-05-14 21:53 (25 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject		: hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date		: 2009-05-14 09:34 (25 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13277
Subject		: 2.6.30 regression - unreliable resume - bisected - Thinkpad X40
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2009-05-11 10:08 (28 days old)
Handled-By	: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject		: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly ..
Submitter	: David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date		: 2009-05-01 16:57 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject		: 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter	: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-21 21:35 (48 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13179
Subject		: CD-R: wodim intermittent failures
Submitter	: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date		: 2009-04-21 1:52 (48 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124027879214231&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13119
Subject		: Trouble with make-install from a NFS mount
Submitter	: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Date		: 2009-04-14 21:32 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123974482327044&w=4
Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13116
Subject		: Can't boot with nosmp
Submitter	: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date		: 2009-04-15 4:18 (54 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123976917817920&w=4
Handled-By	: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Subject		: High latency on /sys/class/thermal
Submitter	: Tiago Simões Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-04-11 14:56 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123946182301248&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
		  Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
Subject		: Machine doesn't boot due to mmconfig detection problem
Submitter	: Pascal Terjan <pterjan@mandriva.com>
Date		: 2009-05-29 19:35 (10 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=044cd80942e47b9de0915b627902adf05c52377f
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124388792118481&w=4
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/27613/


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13462
Subject		: Unused bands in intefb console and smaller 180x56 -> 128x48
Submitter	: Santi <santi@agolina.net>
Date		: 2009-06-05 16:30 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c9fb15f60eb517c958dec64dca9357bf62bf2201
Handled-By	: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13462#c2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13423
Subject		: JMicron SATA controller not available
Submitter	: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-26 22:56 (13 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/26/687
Handled-By	: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/27/402


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject		: Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date		: 2009-05-26 15:24 (13 days old)
Handled-By	: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.29,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (17 days old)

[Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (17 days old)

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Sun,  7 Jun 2009 11:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

 Well the problem is still there afaics.

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (17 days old)
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Alejandro Riveira Fernández]

El Sun,  7 Jun 2009 11:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).

 Well the problem is still there afaics.

> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
> Subject		: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
> Submitter	: Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
> Date		: 2009-05-22 13:32 (17 days old)
> 
> 

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 07 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Sun,  7 Jun 2009 11:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
>  Well the problem is still there afaics.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 07 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> El Sun,  7 Jun 2009 11:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> escribió:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
>  Well the problem is still there afaics.

Thanks for the update.

Best,
Rafael