All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:19:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708031901.GA9924@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A539B11.5020803@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:59:29AM +0800, Rik van Riel wrote:
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > FAQ
> > -------
> > Q: Why do you compared zone accumulate pages, not individual zone pages?
> > A: If we check individual zone, #-of-reclaimer is restricted by smallest zone.
> >    it mean decreasing the performance of the system having small dma zone.
> 
> That is a clever solution!  I was playing around a bit with
> doing it on a per-zone basis.  Your idea is much nicer.
> 
> However, I can see one potential problem with your patch:
> 
> +		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> +		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> +		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> +		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
> +	}
> +
> +	return nr_isolated > nr_inactive;
> 
> What if we ran out of swap space, or are not scanning the
> anon list at all for some reason?
> 
> It is possible that there are no inactive_file pages left,
> with all file pages already isolated, and your function
> still letting reclaimers through.

Good catch!

If swap is always off, NR_ISOLATED_ANON = 0. So it becomes

        NR_ISOLATED_FILE > NR_INACTIVE_FILE + NR_INACTIVE_ANON

which will never be true if there are more anon pages than file pages.

If swap is on but goes full at some time, comparing *ANON is
also meaningless because the anon list won't be scanned.

> This means you could still get a spurious OOM.
> 
> I guess I should mail out my (ugly) approach, so we can
> compare the two :)

And it helps to be aware of all the alternatives, now and future :)

KOSAKI, I tested this updated patch. The OOM seems to be gone, but
now the process could sleep for too long time.

[  316.756006] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [msgctl11:12497]
[  316.756006] Modules linked in: drm snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device iwlagn snd iwlcore soundcore snd_page_alloc video
[  316.756006] irq event stamp: 269858
[  316.756006] hardirqs last  enabled at (269857): [<ffffffff8100cc50>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
[  316.756006] hardirqs last disabled at (269858): [<ffffffff8100bf6a>] save_args+0x6a/0x70
[  316.756006] softirqs last  enabled at (269856): [<ffffffff81055d9e>] __do_softirq+0x19e/0x1f0
[  316.756006] softirqs last disabled at (269841): [<ffffffff8100d3cc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x50
[  316.756006] CPU 1:
[  316.756006] Modules linked in: drm snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device iwlagn snd iwlcore soundcore snd_page_alloc video
[  316.756006] Pid: 12497, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #33 HP Compaq 6910p
[  316.756006] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810804a9>]  [<ffffffff810804a9>] lock_acquire+0xf9/0x120
[  316.756006] RSP: 0000:ffff880013a9fcd8  EFLAGS: 00000246
[  316.756006] RAX: ffff880013a7c500 RBX: ffff880013a9fd28 RCX: ffffffff81b6c928
[  316.756006] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff82130ff0 RDI: 0000000000000246
[  316.756006] RBP: ffffffff8100cb8e R08: ffffff18f84dc1fb R09: 0000000000000001
[  316.756006] R10: 00000000000001ce R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000002
[  316.756006] R13: ffff880013a7cc90 R14: 000000008107eca9 R15: ffff880013a9fd08
[  316.756006] FS:  00007f91a8bf76f0(0000) GS:ffff88000272f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  316.756006] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[  316.756006] CR2: 00007f91a8c079a0 CR3: 0000000013a81000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[  316.756006] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  316.756006] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  316.756006] Call Trace:
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e0e6>] ? _spin_lock+0x36/0x70
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810faf43>] ? swapcache_prepare+0x13/0x20
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa423>] ? read_swap_cache_async+0x63/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa567>] ? swapin_readahead+0x87/0xc0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810ec9f9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x719/0x840
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff815911cb>] ? do_page_fault+0x1cb/0x330
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e9e5>] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30
[  316.756006] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
[  316.756006] Pid: 12497, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #33
[  316.756006] Call Trace:
[  316.756006]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8158a01a>] panic+0xa5/0x173
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100cb8e>] ? common_interrupt+0xe/0x13
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81012e69>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8107b745>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x35/0x1c0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158df1b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a733d>] softlockup_tick+0x1ad/0x1e0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8105b91d>] run_local_timers+0x1d/0x30
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8105b96c>] update_process_times+0x3c/0x80
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810773fc>] tick_periodic+0x2c/0x80
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077476>] tick_handle_periodic+0x26/0x90
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077848>] tick_do_broadcast+0x88/0x90
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810779a9>] tick_do_periodic_broadcast+0x39/0x50
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077f34>] tick_handle_periodic_broadcast+0x14/0x50
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100f5ef>] timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a7e70>] handle_IRQ_event+0x70/0x180
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a9cf1>] handle_edge_irq+0xc1/0x160
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100ee6b>] handle_irq+0x4b/0xb0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8159346f>] do_IRQ+0x6f/0xf0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100cb93>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16
[  316.756006]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff810804a9>] ? lock_acquire+0xf9/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e0e6>] ? _spin_lock+0x36/0x70
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810faf43>] ? swapcache_prepare+0x13/0x20
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa423>] ? read_swap_cache_async+0x63/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa567>] ? swapin_readahead+0x87/0xc0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810ec9f9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x719/0x840
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff815911cb>] ? do_page_fault+0x1cb/0x330
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e9e5>] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30
[  316.756006] Rebooting in 100 seconds..


---
 mm/page_alloc.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

--- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1721,6 +1721,30 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	return alloc_flags;
 }
 
+static bool too_many_isolated(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+			      enum zone_type high_zoneidx, nodemask_t *nodemask)
+{
+	unsigned long nr_inactive = 0;
+	unsigned long nr_isolated = 0;
+	struct zoneref *z;
+	struct zone *zone;
+
+	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+					high_zoneidx, nodemask) {
+		if (!populated_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+
+		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
+		if (nr_swap_pages) {
+			nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
+			nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return nr_isolated > nr_inactive;
+}
+
 static inline struct page *
 __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	struct zonelist *zonelist, enum zone_type high_zoneidx,
@@ -1789,6 +1813,11 @@ rebalance:
 	if (p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
 		goto nopage;
 
+	if (too_many_isolated(zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask)) {
+		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ/10);
+		goto restart;
+	}
+
 	/* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
 	page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
 					zonelist, high_zoneidx,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:19:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090708031901.GA9924@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A539B11.5020803@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:59:29AM +0800, Rik van Riel wrote:
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > FAQ
> > -------
> > Q: Why do you compared zone accumulate pages, not individual zone pages?
> > A: If we check individual zone, #-of-reclaimer is restricted by smallest zone.
> >    it mean decreasing the performance of the system having small dma zone.
> 
> That is a clever solution!  I was playing around a bit with
> doing it on a per-zone basis.  Your idea is much nicer.
> 
> However, I can see one potential problem with your patch:
> 
> +		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> +		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> +		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> +		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
> +	}
> +
> +	return nr_isolated > nr_inactive;
> 
> What if we ran out of swap space, or are not scanning the
> anon list at all for some reason?
> 
> It is possible that there are no inactive_file pages left,
> with all file pages already isolated, and your function
> still letting reclaimers through.

Good catch!

If swap is always off, NR_ISOLATED_ANON = 0. So it becomes

        NR_ISOLATED_FILE > NR_INACTIVE_FILE + NR_INACTIVE_ANON

which will never be true if there are more anon pages than file pages.

If swap is on but goes full at some time, comparing *ANON is
also meaningless because the anon list won't be scanned.

> This means you could still get a spurious OOM.
> 
> I guess I should mail out my (ugly) approach, so we can
> compare the two :)

And it helps to be aware of all the alternatives, now and future :)

KOSAKI, I tested this updated patch. The OOM seems to be gone, but
now the process could sleep for too long time.

[  316.756006] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [msgctl11:12497]
[  316.756006] Modules linked in: drm snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device iwlagn snd iwlcore soundcore snd_page_alloc video
[  316.756006] irq event stamp: 269858
[  316.756006] hardirqs last  enabled at (269857): [<ffffffff8100cc50>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
[  316.756006] hardirqs last disabled at (269858): [<ffffffff8100bf6a>] save_args+0x6a/0x70
[  316.756006] softirqs last  enabled at (269856): [<ffffffff81055d9e>] __do_softirq+0x19e/0x1f0
[  316.756006] softirqs last disabled at (269841): [<ffffffff8100d3cc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x50
[  316.756006] CPU 1:
[  316.756006] Modules linked in: drm snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device iwlagn snd iwlcore soundcore snd_page_alloc video
[  316.756006] Pid: 12497, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #33 HP Compaq 6910p
[  316.756006] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810804a9>]  [<ffffffff810804a9>] lock_acquire+0xf9/0x120
[  316.756006] RSP: 0000:ffff880013a9fcd8  EFLAGS: 00000246
[  316.756006] RAX: ffff880013a7c500 RBX: ffff880013a9fd28 RCX: ffffffff81b6c928
[  316.756006] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff82130ff0 RDI: 0000000000000246
[  316.756006] RBP: ffffffff8100cb8e R08: ffffff18f84dc1fb R09: 0000000000000001
[  316.756006] R10: 00000000000001ce R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000002
[  316.756006] R13: ffff880013a7cc90 R14: 000000008107eca9 R15: ffff880013a9fd08
[  316.756006] FS:  00007f91a8bf76f0(0000) GS:ffff88000272f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  316.756006] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[  316.756006] CR2: 00007f91a8c079a0 CR3: 0000000013a81000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[  316.756006] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  316.756006] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  316.756006] Call Trace:
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e0e6>] ? _spin_lock+0x36/0x70
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810faf43>] ? swapcache_prepare+0x13/0x20
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa423>] ? read_swap_cache_async+0x63/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa567>] ? swapin_readahead+0x87/0xc0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810ec9f9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x719/0x840
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff815911cb>] ? do_page_fault+0x1cb/0x330
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e9e5>] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30
[  316.756006] Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
[  316.756006] Pid: 12497, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1 #33
[  316.756006] Call Trace:
[  316.756006]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8158a01a>] panic+0xa5/0x173
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100cb8e>] ? common_interrupt+0xe/0x13
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81012e69>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8107b745>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x35/0x1c0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158df1b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a733d>] softlockup_tick+0x1ad/0x1e0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8105b91d>] run_local_timers+0x1d/0x30
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8105b96c>] update_process_times+0x3c/0x80
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810773fc>] tick_periodic+0x2c/0x80
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077476>] tick_handle_periodic+0x26/0x90
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077848>] tick_do_broadcast+0x88/0x90
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810779a9>] tick_do_periodic_broadcast+0x39/0x50
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff81077f34>] tick_handle_periodic_broadcast+0x14/0x50
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100f5ef>] timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a7e70>] handle_IRQ_event+0x70/0x180
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810a9cf1>] handle_edge_irq+0xc1/0x160
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100ee6b>] handle_irq+0x4b/0xb0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8159346f>] do_IRQ+0x6f/0xf0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8100cb93>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16
[  316.756006]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff810804a9>] ? lock_acquire+0xf9/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e0e6>] ? _spin_lock+0x36/0x70
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fade9>] ? __swap_duplicate+0x59/0x1a0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810faf43>] ? swapcache_prepare+0x13/0x20
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa423>] ? read_swap_cache_async+0x63/0x120
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810fa567>] ? swapin_readahead+0x87/0xc0
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff810ec9f9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x719/0x840
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff815911cb>] ? do_page_fault+0x1cb/0x330
[  316.756006]  [<ffffffff8158e9e5>] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30
[  316.756006] Rebooting in 100 seconds..


---
 mm/page_alloc.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

--- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1721,6 +1721,30 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	return alloc_flags;
 }
 
+static bool too_many_isolated(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+			      enum zone_type high_zoneidx, nodemask_t *nodemask)
+{
+	unsigned long nr_inactive = 0;
+	unsigned long nr_isolated = 0;
+	struct zoneref *z;
+	struct zone *zone;
+
+	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+					high_zoneidx, nodemask) {
+		if (!populated_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+
+		nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+		nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
+		if (nr_swap_pages) {
+			nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
+			nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return nr_isolated > nr_inactive;
+}
+
 static inline struct page *
 __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	struct zonelist *zonelist, enum zone_type high_zoneidx,
@@ -1789,6 +1813,11 @@ rebalance:
 	if (p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
 		goto nopage;
 
+	if (too_many_isolated(zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask)) {
+		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ/10);
+		goto restart;
+	}
+
 	/* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
 	page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
 					zonelist, high_zoneidx,

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-08  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07  9:40 [RFC PATCH 0/2] fix unnecessary accidental OOM problem on concurrent reclaim KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07  9:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07  9:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07  9:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 13:23   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-07 13:23     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-07 18:59   ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-07 18:59     ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-08  3:19     ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-07-08  3:19       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  1:51       ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages in a zone Rik van Riel
2009-07-09  1:51         ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-09  2:47         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  2:47           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  3:07           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  3:07             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  7:01             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09  7:01               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09  8:42               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09  8:42                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09 11:07                 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09 11:07                   ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09  6:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09  6:39           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 23:39   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages Minchan Kim
2009-07-07 23:39     ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09  3:12     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09  3:12       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07  9:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Don't continue reclaim if the system have plenty free memory KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07  9:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 13:20   ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-07 13:20     ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09  5:08     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09  5:08       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09 10:58       ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09 10:58         ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-13  0:37         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-13  0:37           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090708031901.GA9924@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.