From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Fix enabling OFDM weak signal detection
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:03:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090714180348.GD25788@mosca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890907101102i29352c6bq9e511663e2c3a986@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:02:58AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Steven Luo<steven@steven676.net> wrote:
> > From: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
> >
> > It seems that OFDM weak signal detection should be enabled after an ANI
> > state reset, as indicated by the initial setting of ofdmWeakSigDetectOff
> > and what the open Atheros HAL does. Unfortunately, the reversed sense
> > of ofdmWeakSigDetectOff (true if weak signal detection is NOT enabled)
> > seems to have resulted in a mixup here, causing weak signal detection to
> > be disabled.
> >
> > This patch significantly improves reception and throughput from distant
> > stations for my AR5416-based AP running compat-wireless 2009-06-25.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
> > Cc: stable at kernel.org
> > ---
>
> NACK for now, please give us a chance to review this -- this may
> actually be correct.
Please try this patch instead, I've only compile tested this.
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: Tune ANI function processing on AP mode during ANI reset
For AP mode we must tune ANI specially for 2 GHz and
for 5 GHz. We mask in only the flags we want to toggle
on ath9k_hw_ani_control() through the ah->ani_function
bitmask, this will take care of ignoring changes during
ANI reset which we were disabling before.
Reported-by: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
Cc: Bennyam Malavazi <Bennyam.Malavazi at Atheros.com
Cc: Jouni Malinen <Jouni.Malinen@Atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
@@ -478,6 +478,19 @@ void ath9k_ani_reset(struct ath_hw *ah)
"Reset ANI state opmode %u\n", ah->opmode);
ah->stats.ast_ani_reset++;
+ if (ah->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
+ ah->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) {
+ /*
+ * ath9k_hw_ani_control() will only process items set on
+ * ah->ani_function
+ */
+ if (IS_CHAN_2GHZ(chan))
+ ah->ani_function = (ATH9K_ANI_SPUR_IMMUNITY_LEVEL |
+ ATH9K_ANI_FIRSTEP_LEVEL);
+ else
+ ah->ani_function = 0;
+ }
+
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_NOISE_IMMUNITY_LEVEL, 0);
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_SPUR_IMMUNITY_LEVEL, 0);
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_FIRSTEP_LEVEL, 0);
--
1.6.3.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>,
Bennyam Malavazi <Bennyam.Malavazi@Atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Jouni Malinen <Jouni.Malinen@Atheros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@Atheros.com>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
Vasanth Thiagarajan <Vasanth.Thiagarajan@Atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Fix enabling OFDM weak signal detection
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:03:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090714180348.GD25788@mosca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890907101102i29352c6bq9e511663e2c3a986@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:02:58AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Steven Luo<steven@steven676.net> wrote:
> > From: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
> >
> > It seems that OFDM weak signal detection should be enabled after an ANI
> > state reset, as indicated by the initial setting of ofdmWeakSigDetectOff
> > and what the open Atheros HAL does. Unfortunately, the reversed sense
> > of ofdmWeakSigDetectOff (true if weak signal detection is NOT enabled)
> > seems to have resulted in a mixup here, causing weak signal detection to
> > be disabled.
> >
> > This patch significantly improves reception and throughput from distant
> > stations for my AR5416-based AP running compat-wireless 2009-06-25.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > ---
>
> NACK for now, please give us a chance to review this -- this may
> actually be correct.
Please try this patch instead, I've only compile tested this.
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: Tune ANI function processing on AP mode during ANI reset
For AP mode we must tune ANI specially for 2 GHz and
for 5 GHz. We mask in only the flags we want to toggle
on ath9k_hw_ani_control() through the ah->ani_function
bitmask, this will take care of ignoring changes during
ANI reset which we were disabling before.
Reported-by: Steven Luo <steven@steven676.net>
Cc: Bennyam Malavazi <Bennyam.Malavazi@Atheros.com
Cc: Jouni Malinen <Jouni.Malinen@Atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ani.c
@@ -478,6 +478,19 @@ void ath9k_ani_reset(struct ath_hw *ah)
"Reset ANI state opmode %u\n", ah->opmode);
ah->stats.ast_ani_reset++;
+ if (ah->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
+ ah->opmode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) {
+ /*
+ * ath9k_hw_ani_control() will only process items set on
+ * ah->ani_function
+ */
+ if (IS_CHAN_2GHZ(chan))
+ ah->ani_function = (ATH9K_ANI_SPUR_IMMUNITY_LEVEL |
+ ATH9K_ANI_FIRSTEP_LEVEL);
+ else
+ ah->ani_function = 0;
+ }
+
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_NOISE_IMMUNITY_LEVEL, 0);
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_SPUR_IMMUNITY_LEVEL, 0);
ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_FIRSTEP_LEVEL, 0);
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-09 21:12 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Fix enabling OFDM weak signal detection Steven Luo
2009-07-09 21:12 ` Steven Luo
2009-07-10 18:02 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-10 18:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-10 18:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-11 15:23 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-07-11 15:23 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-07-14 18:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-07-14 18:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-14 18:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-14 18:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-07-15 4:04 ` Steven Luo
2009-07-15 4:04 ` Steven Luo
2009-07-11 15:26 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-07-11 15:26 ` Nick Kossifidis
2009-07-11 18:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Steven Luo
2009-07-11 18:48 ` Steven Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090714180348.GD25788@mosca \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.