All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rientjes@google.com, npiggin@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-allocator: Ensure that processes that have been OOM killed exit the page allocator (resend)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:05:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090716110557.GC22499@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090715133014.a3566bdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 01:30:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:49:45 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > Processes that have been OOM killed set the thread flag TIF_MEMDIE. A process
> > such as this is expected to exit the page allocator but potentially, it
> > loops forever. This patch checks TIF_MEMDIE when deciding whether to loop
> > again in the page allocator. If set, and __GFP_NOFAIL is not specified
> > then the loop will exit on the assumption it's no longer important for the
> > process to make forward progress. Note that a process that has just been
> > OOM-killed will still loop at least one more time retrying the allocation
> > before the thread flag is checked.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > --- 
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |    8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f8902e7..5c98d02 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1547,6 +1547,14 @@ should_alloc_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> >  	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	/* Do not loop if OOM-killed unless __GFP_NOFAIL is specified */
> > +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)) {
> > +		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> > +			WARN(1, "Potential infinite loop with __GFP_NOFAIL");
> > +		else
> > +			return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * In this implementation, order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> >  	 * means __GFP_NOFAIL, but that may not be true in other
> 
> This fixes a post-2.6.30 regression, yes?
> 
> I dug out the commit ID a while back but lost it. Ho hum.
> 

You made a note at the time "Offending commit 341ce06 handled the PF_MEMALLOC
case but forgot about the TIF_MEMDIE case."

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rientjes@google.com, npiggin@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-allocator: Ensure that processes that have been OOM killed exit the page allocator (resend)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:05:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090716110557.GC22499@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090715133014.a3566bdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 01:30:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:49:45 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > Processes that have been OOM killed set the thread flag TIF_MEMDIE. A process
> > such as this is expected to exit the page allocator but potentially, it
> > loops forever. This patch checks TIF_MEMDIE when deciding whether to loop
> > again in the page allocator. If set, and __GFP_NOFAIL is not specified
> > then the loop will exit on the assumption it's no longer important for the
> > process to make forward progress. Note that a process that has just been
> > OOM-killed will still loop at least one more time retrying the allocation
> > before the thread flag is checked.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > --- 
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |    8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f8902e7..5c98d02 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1547,6 +1547,14 @@ should_alloc_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> >  	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	/* Do not loop if OOM-killed unless __GFP_NOFAIL is specified */
> > +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)) {
> > +		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> > +			WARN(1, "Potential infinite loop with __GFP_NOFAIL");
> > +		else
> > +			return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * In this implementation, order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> >  	 * means __GFP_NOFAIL, but that may not be true in other
> 
> This fixes a post-2.6.30 regression, yes?
> 
> I dug out the commit ID a while back but lost it. Ho hum.
> 

You made a note at the time "Offending commit 341ce06 handled the PF_MEMALLOC
case but forgot about the TIF_MEMDIE case."

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-16 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-15 10:49 [PATCH] page-allocator: Ensure that processes that have been OOM killed exit the page allocator (resend) Mel Gorman
2009-07-15 10:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-15 20:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-15 20:29   ` David Rientjes
2009-07-15 20:59   ` David Rientjes
2009-07-15 20:59     ` David Rientjes
2009-07-16 11:03   ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-16 11:03     ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-16 19:14     ` David Rientjes
2009-07-16 19:14       ` David Rientjes
2009-07-17  9:21       ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-17  9:21         ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-17 10:29         ` David Rientjes
2009-07-17 10:29           ` David Rientjes
2009-07-17 12:41           ` Hugh Dickins
2009-07-17 12:41             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-07-15 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-15 20:30   ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16 11:05   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-07-16 11:05     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090716110557.GC22499@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.