From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: mjg@redhat.com, maciej.rutecki@gmail.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hp-wmi: improve rfkill support
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:28:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907232128.19735.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A65A2F9.1060509@tuffmail.co.uk>
Alan Jenkins wrote:
> 1) Add support for reading the hardware blocked state. Previously
> we read a combination of the hardware and software blocked states,
> reporting it as the software blocked state. This caused some
> confusing behaviour.
>
> 2) The software state is persistent, mark it as such.
>
> 3) Check rfkill in the resume handler. Both the hard and soft
> blocked states may change over hibernation.
I've added this to my local branch for .31 for my HP 2510p.
Light testing (linux only) showed no problems with .31-rc4.
One question: is it expected that pressing the hardware kill switch only
enables the block for phy0? I guess it's probably sufficient.
$ ./rfkill list # after pressing hardware switch
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: yes
1: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
Looks like with bluetooth soft-blocked the wireless leds blink on wifi
network traffic, while with bluetooth unblocked it stays on permanently.
Cheers,
FJP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-23 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 11:14 [PATCH] hp-wmi: improve rfkill support Alan Jenkins
2009-07-21 11:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-07-23 15:31 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 15:31 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 18:27 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-07-23 19:36 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 19:36 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 19:28 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-12-10 4:53 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907232128.19735.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.