From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hp-wmi: improve rfkill support
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:27:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A68AB8F.9020609@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db1092f0907230831w1255d0bey951342fb61b67c1e@mail.gmail.com>
Maciej Rutecki wrote:
> 2009/7/21 Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>:
>
>> 1) Add support for reading the hardware blocked state. Previously
>> we read a combination of the hardware and software blocked states,
>> reporting it as the software blocked state. This caused some
>> confusing behaviour.
>>
>> 2) The software state is persistent, mark it as such.
>>
>> 3) Check rfkill in the resume handler. Both the hard and soft
>> blocked states may change over hibernation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
>>
>
> It's this patch is added to -rc4?
No.
<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=hp-wmi>
I didn't submit it for 2.6.31 because I didn't think it fixed a regression.
> I one case I have strange behaviour.
>
> Before disable by button:
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# rfkill list
> 2: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 3: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 16: hci0: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 17: phy7: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
>
> Disable by button:
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# rfkill list
> 2: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 3: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 17: phy7: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: yes
>
> I do s2disk. After resume from suspend to disk (still disabled by button):
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# rfkill list
> 2: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 3: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 18: phy8: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: yes
>
> Try enable by button:
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# rfkill list
> 2: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 3: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: yes
> Hard blocked: no
> 18: phy8: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: yes
>
> Nothing change (LED, wireless and bluetooth don't work). To enable it
> I use this script rfkill.sh (I must use rfkill program):
>
> #!/bin/sh
> PROGRAM=/usr/local/sbin/rfkill
> WIFI=`$PROGRAM list | grep -E 'Wireless|Bluetooth' | cut -d ':' -f 1`
>
> for DEVICE in $WIFI; do
> echo $DEVICE
> $PROGRAM unblock $DEVICE
> done
>
> Then works OK:
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# ./rfkill.sh
> 2
> 3
> 18
> root@gumis:/home/maciek/Desktop# rfkill list
> 2: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 3: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 18: phy8: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
> 19: hci0: Bluetooth
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: no
>
> It's normal behaviour?
>
That's a bug. You're saying this is in -rc4, without applying my patch?
I think I know exactly what is happening. Apply my patch, and it will
go away :-).
I'm not sure this is a new bug though. It might be triggered by the big
rfkill rewrite, but I don't see how that could happen. Can you confirm
if this happens in 2.6.30?
Thanks
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-23 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 11:14 [PATCH] hp-wmi: improve rfkill support Alan Jenkins
2009-07-21 11:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-07-23 15:31 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 15:31 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 18:27 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-07-23 19:36 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 19:36 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-07-23 19:28 ` Frans Pop
2009-12-10 4:53 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A68AB8F.9020609@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.