From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Provide iowait counters
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:21:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090725002148.5524c846.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248501946.6987.146.camel@twins>
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:05:46 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 22:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > > See include/linux/sched.h's definition of task_delay_info - u64
> > > > blkio_delay is in nanoseconds. It uses
> > > > do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() internally.
> > >
> > > looks like it does.. to bad we don't expose that data in
> > a /proc/<pid>/delay or something field
> > > like we do with the scheduler info...
> > >
> >
> > I thought we did deliver a few of the taskstats counters via procfs,
> > but maybe I dreamed it. It would have been a rather bad thing to do.
> >
> > taskstats has a large advantage over /proc-based things: it delivers a
> > packet to the monitoring process(es) when the monitored task exits.
> > So
> > with no polling at all it is possible to gather all that information
> > about the just-completed task. This isn't possible with /proc.
> >
> > There's a patch on the list now to teach taskstats to emit a packet at
> > fork- and exit-time too.
> >
> > The monitored task can be polled at any time during its execution
> > also,
> > like /proc files.
> >
> > Please consider switching whatever-you're-working-on over to use
> > taskstats rather than adding (duplicative) things to /proc (which
> > require CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, btw).
> >
> > If there's stuff missing from taskstats then we can add it - it's
> > versioned and upgradeable and is a better interface. It's better
> > to make taskstats stronger than it is to add /proc/pid fields,
> > methinks.
>
> The below exposes the information to ftrace and perf counters, it uses
> the scheduler accounting (which is often much cheaper than
> do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime, and more 'accurate' in the sense that
> its what the scheduler itself uses).
Well. The do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() call is already there,
and this change adds more code on top of Arjan's code which wasn't
needed if he can use taskstats.
> This allows profiling tasks based on iowait time, for example, something
> not possible with taskstats afaik.
>
> Maybe there's a use for taskstats still, maybe not.
>
> ---
> Subject: sched: wait, sleep and iowait accounting tracepoints
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Thu Jul 23 20:13:26 CEST 2009
>
> Add 3 schedstat tracepoints to help account for wait-time, sleep-time
> and iowait-time.
>
> They can also be used as a perf-counter source to profile tasks on
> these clocks.
This may be a useful feature, dunno. But it seems to be unrelated to
Arjan's requirement, apart from building on top of it.
What _is_ Arjan's requirement, anyway? I don't think it's really been
spelled out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-25 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 18:31 [PATCH] sched: Provide iowait counters Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-20 19:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 19:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-20 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-20 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-20 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 21:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-25 4:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 4:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 4:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 5:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 6:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-25 7:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-07-25 16:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-25 17:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 18:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-08-03 13:21 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-02 7:00 ` tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090725002148.5524c846.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.