From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Provide iowait counters
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:56:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6B4731.5050400@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248543674.5780.36.camel@laptop>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:42 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> In case you wonder why you need both tools, and can't just use one: we
>> wondered the same, but it turns out that if you only build
>> Tool Two, you don't get a good overview of what is going on on a
>> higher level. It's like looking at the world via a microscope all the
>> time,
>
> I'd be thinking you could compose your ms based picture on the sample
> data. For instance, if you sample on cpu-clock at 100kHz, then a 100
> samples get you a full blue slice, 50 get you a 50% blue slice, etc.
we can compose part of it from the details (but there's a lot of details),
but not nearly all of it, things like the IO bandwidth etc we just can't
do this with.
we could do this for cpu use to a large degree though I suppose
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-25 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 18:31 [PATCH] sched: Provide iowait counters Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-20 19:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 19:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-20 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-20 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-20 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 21:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-07-25 4:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 4:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 4:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 5:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 6:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-25 7:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-25 16:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-25 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-25 17:56 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-07-25 18:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-08-03 13:21 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-02 7:00 ` tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A6B4731.5050400@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.